similar to: :disable_with combined with Ajax form: Possible?

With form_tag submit buttons I use the " :disable_with => ''button label while processing'' " option so that visitors with slow connections aren''t able to submit forms twice. How do I do the same thing with button_to? I''ve got several pages where there are multiple forms on the page being updated with Ajax so I can''t wrap the whole

Hi Group, I have a registration.html.erb page with the following JavaScript at the top which I use to validate form fields: <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- function validate(){ if ((document.myForm.email_projectname.value=="")|| (document.myForm.email_projecttype_id.selectedIndex<1)|| (document.myForm.email_region_id.selectedIndex<1)) { alert

I just added :disable_with attributes to a handful of form submit tags, and they worked as expected for normal forms. But in the two instances where I added them to ajax forms (ie, form_remote_tag generated forms), they caused unexpected behavior -- rather than update a target, the form response loaded in the browser as if it had been rendered with :layout => false. Before I dig into

I''m trying to use respond_to to redirect visitors who have JS turned off to a different page. The problem I''m having is that respond_to is sending *everybody* there. It''s not recognizing that JS is turned on in the browser. The wanted_html.rhtml file below is rendered whether I''ve got JS turned on or off. I''ve looked at the Accept headers being sent

Hi there, I''m sure a lot of you guys have come across this question: How can we render several :partials on a page *before* the called :action has finished? Basically, my situation is this: When I click on a certain button, 3 things are supposed to happen: - INSTANTLY: the button should become disabled (either by setting ":disabled" to "true" by updating the

I''m having some difficulty with IE8 on a Rails 2.3.5 app. I''ll state from the outset that this problem does not occur with Firefox, Chrome, or Opera when run on the same system so I''m reasonably certain I''ve got an IE issue here. Here''s a simple description: I''m ending a Users#new form with: <p><%= submit_tag, "Sign

Hey, I want to disable the form when an user submits, I know that u can do this with javascript. But i dont want to put code for each form on my website, and I have a lot of forms like.. <%= start_form_tag :action => ''create'' %> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5"> <tr> <td

Hi, I''ve got a real head-scratcher. I''ve got a standard Ajax form using form_remote_tag, which calls a controller action which adds a comment and then sends back some JS via RJS which updates a few items on the page. It did work fine but (and I''ve no idea what has happened) now it doesn''t. It calls the controller action but gets an empty response back and

Hello, Just chiming in here: >From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On >Behalf Of >bdolljr@bigskytech.com >Sent: Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 01:24 p.m. >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial >Discussion >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dell Hardware >> Mmhh nice !! So, why did Digium forbid it :)?

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107210 Bug ID: 107210 Summary: Segment Fault while opening thunderbitf windows Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

While running a multiple VM testscase with each VM running iperf traffic between others the following kernel NULL pointer exception was seen. Race appears when the tun driver instance of one VM calls skb_array_produce (from tun_net_xmit) and the the destined VM's skb_array_consume (from tun_ring_recv), which could run concurrently on another core. Due to which the sock_wfree gets called again

While running a multiple VM testscase with each VM running iperf traffic between others the following kernel NULL pointer exception was seen. Race appears when the tun driver instance of one VM calls skb_array_produce (from tun_net_xmit) and the the destined VM's skb_array_consume (from tun_ring_recv), which could run concurrently on another core. Due to which the sock_wfree gets called again

Hi there! I need some help, I''m new to rjs + will_paginate and don''t know how to solve this problem. The application apparently is working fine, the partial is rendered by the javascript, the pagination works fine, but sometimes, when I hit the next page number or " next >>", it reders the code below. Im using rails 2.3.8, ruby 1.8.7. and will_paginate 2.3.15

Hi, We are encountering occasions where users post twice or more a form, basically we have detected two situations: a) The user push twice enter b) The user push double click on button "save" or "submit" We consider that this becomes a problem when creating (because we duplicate data) and we think that in some context it could become a security issue

This code disables the ''Save'' button once clicked, but doesn''t seem to send the form data. <%= submit_tag ''Save'', :class => ''submit'', :onclick => "document.getElementById(''save_button'').disabled=true;", :id => "save_button" %> This code sends the form data and a record is created,

Has anyone gotten the :html option for specifying a ''fallback'' action if javascript''s not enabled working on form_remote_tag (or remote_form_for)? I can''t figure out how to specify the action that''s supposed to be invoked if js _is_ enabled. Or maybe I''m just misunderstanding how this thing is supposed to work. I was assuming

Are these the current functional procedures for dropping a dom0 on a jaunty 64 bit server? xen-tools: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/attempt-of-prevu-xen-3-4-1-hypervisor-on-ubuntu-jaunty-server-64-bit/ kernel: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/building-xenified-2-6-30-1-kernel-via-xen-patches-2-6-30-2-tar-bz2/ Regarding the patches used in the above procedure from here:

I just built a 2 node(4 bricks), Distributed-Replicated and everything mounts fine. Each node mounts using GlusterFS client on its hostname (mount -t glusterfs hostname:VOLUME /virtual-machines) When creating a new Virtual Machine using virt-manager it creates the file on the storage, but when trying to power it On, it doesn't work and gives back an error message.(See below. Yes the folder has

It's Digium, not Dell. I have two identical Dell 1850s, each with the allegedly offensive built-in E100 Ethernet ports. I placed a TE410P card in each. One worked great, the other would not modprobe. Upon examination, we discovered that the two TE410P cards had different firmware revisions. Turns out the one with the older version was the one that worked. We sent the second card back

I have a standard form built with rails, which a user to my site can use to submit data. Unfortunately one user just managed to submit exactly the the same data three times in a row. From the server logs it seems as though he didn''t use his back button and then resubmit everything. It looks more like he got a bit fed up waiting for the form to process and pressed the submit button three