Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "`stack level too deep` when overwriting `to_json`"
2009 Feb 23
2
to_json problem (Rails2.2.2)
Hi all,
i got a record from my project server side database, like this :
@user = User.find 1
then i cover @user to json format:
@user.to_json
the result :
"created_at": "2009-01-28T12:29:32Z"
what''s the T and Z of created_at field ?
but i change Rails 2.2.2 to Rails1.1.6,
I got :
"created_at":
2007 Mar 24
0
overloading to_json with JSON gem installed causing error
I installed the JSON gem because I wanted the JSON parser.
Before installing the JSON gem, overloading worked fine. Before I
remove it, I''d like to see if anyone has an idea of what is going on.
It''s the only JSON parser I''m aware of, so it would be a bummer if it
didn''t work.
After installing, if I overload the to_json method in the class, it
gives me the
2008 Jul 12
0
to_json in Rails 2.0.2 not generating proper json?
I am using Rails 2.0.2 and trying to use to_json to generate json. I
notice several problems.
1) datetime field such as created_at mapped to "created_at": {}
2) :except does not work, @post.to_json(:except =>
[:created_at, :updated_at] still gives me "created_at": {},
"update_at": {}
3) problem with escaped char mapping: ''<'' mapped to
2007 Oct 23
2
to_json inconsistency?
Hello,
ActiveSupport::JSON::Variable.to_json is the only to_json without an
"options" parameter. Is this intended?
For example, this code in a .rjs
page[@user.dom_id].visual_effect :drop_out, :afterFinish =>
ActiveSupport::JSON::Variable.new("foo")
fails with
ActionView::TemplateError: wrong number of arguments (1 for 0)
On line #7 of
2006 Jan 20
1
stack level too deep from has_many / belongs_to relationship
I have the following 3 models (2 models joined by an intermediate):
1. class Exercise < ActiveRecord::Base
2. has_many :routines, :class_name=>''RoutineExercise''
3. end
1. class Routine < ActiveRecord::Base
2. has_many :exercises,
3. :class_name=>''RoutineExercise'',
4. :order=>''position''
5. end
1. class
2012 Jan 27
2
to_json performance
Originally posted on github, reported to the right place.
I would like to open a discussion about how `to_json` and `as_json`
operates in Rails from a performance standpoint.
I''m using Rails 3.2 but this issue applies to almost all versions of
Rails.
Our use case presents the challenge in sending out potentially large
JSON (or XML, but we''ll focus on JSON rendering here)
2010 Feb 20
1
Advanced use of to_xml and to_json
Hello,
I''m working on a Rails app which has a REST API. I manage two formats
JSON and XML.
Very often to simplify the use if the API, I''m making includes. But when
you add params to to_json and to_xml like :only, :except, it''s not only
applied on the root object but on all the objects included.
Do you know libs or methods to answer to these different problems:
* Tell
2007 Dec 11
0
help for hash.to_json
hi , all
under rails 2.0
aotianlong@aotianlong:~/workspace/killer$ ruby script/console
Loading development environment (Rails 2.0.1)
>> {:user=>"aotianlong"}.to_json
=> "{\"user\": \"aotianlong\"}"
>> user = User.find :first
=> #<User id: 1, uname: "aotianlong">
>> user.to_json
=>
2011 Apr 17
0
newbie: to_json only/except + association confusion
hi,
i want to return to_json with ''only'' and also filtered.so i tried
various ways, but none of them are really good:
A)#OK , but filter missing
format.json { render :json => @project.to_json(:only =>
[:title ], :include=> { :tasks => {:only=>[:id,:title] } } ) }
B)#Not OK > filter does not work,
format.json { render :json => @project.to_json(:only
2013 Jan 07
0
Simplified to_json method API
Sometimes to_json options feels abusing to me:
user.to_json(:only => [:id, :name], :methods => [:something])
I would prefer an API like this instead:
user.to_json(:id, :name, :something)
What do you think about adding a use case like this to to_json?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To view this
2007 Mar 28
7
Rails, REST and JSON
Hi everyone,
I''m writing a lightweight AJAX application using Rails on the server side as
a RESTful web service provider.
I need the web service to support both JSON and XML I/O. Outputting data in
XML and JSON is easy (using to_xml and to_json),
and it''s also easy to do XML input as Rails does it for you automatically.
Is it possible to somehow have the same
automatic parsing
2009 Jan 21
3
Nested serialization with to_json and to_xml with array and hash element
Title: Nested serialization with to_json and to_xml with array and
hash element
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :address
has_one :job
def office()
return "Executive_Suite"
end
end
class Address < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :person
end
class Job < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :person
has_one :paygrade
def Title
return "Engineer"
end
end
2009 Aug 07
0
How to specify ActiveRecord's to_json encoding
Question:
Hi, our company is using Ruby 1.8.6 with Rails 2.2.2. Does anyone
know we can explicitly specify what encoding to use when calling
to_json() or to_xml() methods?
Problem:
We have some multibyte characters in our database. For example we
have a table with a name column that has this French accented e: Café
Records. When we serialize this object using ActiveRecord''s to_xml()
2013 Jan 07
0
Simplified to_json usage
Sometimes default json options feels abusing to me:
person.to_json(:only => [:id, :name], :methods => [:something])
I would like to be able to call something like this for AR objects
person.to_json(:id, :name, :something)
What do you think about extending to_json API with this use case?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:
2006 May 27
5
ActiveSupport JSON working?
Hi,
I am trying to convert a hash to JSON using ActiveSupports built in
.to_json. I am doing similar to the example below but are there
certain strings that could go in place of ''bar'' or ''rez'' that will
break the to_json method? I am using a very long string from rjs
output in place of ''bar''.
Perhaps .to_json is not ready yet?
Thanks,
Peter
2008 Mar 13
4
AJAX slow - to_json responsible?
Hello.
I am building full-ajax back-end, which consits of many quite big
partials. As the system grows up, performance is problem. After every
click, partial is refreshed, if needed. I am now at 0.5 sec / request. I
tried to simply disable ajax and the result was quite suprising: the
same page is rendered over 2x faster. I update 80% of page in case of
ajax. (Please dont tell: dont use ajax when
2006 Apr 04
2
HABTM
Hi.
Im new to Ruby and new to Ruby on Rails and have problems realizing a =20=
simple many_to_many relationship:
My tables:
items <-> items_users <-> users
------------------------------------------------------------------------=20=
--------------------------------------
id user_id =
id
name item_id name
... =
password
=
......
My Code:
class
2010 Apr 05
2
Harmonizing JSON/XML serialization
The way Rails handles root nodes in JSON and XML serialization is
inconsistent. This has been discussed before:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/2584-232-activeresource-json-doesnt-send-parameters-with-root-node
This seems mostly taken care of with
ActiveModel::Base.include_root_in_json, especially if/when it ends up
in ActiveResource. However, there is also the issue of how
2007 Oct 04
4
2 more JSON / XML feature parity patches before Rails 2.0
I''d really like to see just 2 more functional changes to the JSON
serialization/encoding before we get to Rails 2.0.
First, and I think this is really crucial because without it all the
efforts to output JSON from ActiveRecord objects would have been half
in vain, is to allow us to do this in controllers:
@authors = Author.find(:all)
render :json => @authors.to_json(:only =>
2007 Oct 01
0
Patch review requested: #9750 Unambiguous Time, Date and DateTime #to_json format
This patch changes the date format for Time, Date and DateTime
#to_json from the ambiguous
10/01/2007
...to the unambiguous
2007/10/01
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9750
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to