similar to: How RoR extract a http parameterfrom arequest?

First, yes, I have read the piece on chroot.... Trying to get an AIX (5.3) to run rsync 2.6.2 as a daemon I have tried every possibly usage to stop chroot, used no and false, as on the web it has showed up as either. Also dropped flag --numeric-ids when running.... Here is my test config--- # Simple test config file log file = /tmp/rsync.log [test] use chroot = no path = /tmp/rsync_test/

[Arrow] [Idea] [Exclamation] Subject: ~RED ALERT**URGENT 2009 [CDC::"girl's suicide rate 'skyrockets' 76%" [Shocked] .....What is causing this [Question] and, Help stop this [Exclamation] ]~ ******* ------>>> Which is more important, $$$ or your daughters [Question] <<<------ ******* ~~~RED ALERT~~~ {~See CDC quote---76% 'skyrocket' rise is real

Hey LLVM-Mailing-List and Lang, I'm still learning how to use the ORC JIT but I finally reached the point to JIT and execute some code. For this purpose I created a test file (TestModule.cpp) and compiled it with Clang, generating two different files, one in the LLVM IR format and one in the Microsoft COFF format. The JIT resolves all undefined references, including "extern int

I have so far been unable to get rsync to work properly in a test setup. Does anyone have any ideas? Both PCs are running RedHat 7.2. The Server: IP Address 192.168.0.202 Server Name: RH72TB hosts.allow ALL: 192.168.0.201 rsyncd.conf: [testmodule] path = /tmp The Client: IP Address 192.168.0.201 hosts file: 192.168.0.202 RH72TB I have run "rsync --daemon" on the server.

I'm new to rsync and trying to configure it to run through either the daemon or rsh (ssh is not avalilable). Doing an 'rlogin production' results in a password prompt - which I want rid of, as we're basically going to have a robot user running a cron job that utilises rsync. I'm at a loss as to why I can't configure rlogin to user hosts.equiv or similar - any help on this

> On May 25, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > Thank you for your answer. > But can you answer for some more questions? > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? As James already said "lnt runtest

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, dummy1 at boxpl.com wrote: >> There are many possible ways to do this, can you be a bit more specific >> about what you're trying to do? > Here is a basic example: Ah, ok, I see what you're trying to do. Below is some *pseudo* code for the basic idea: > ============================================ > unsigned int buff[4096]; > > int main

I try to use INITIALIZE_PASS instead of RegisterPass<> to register my pass, though I don't understand what's their difference and how it works because its documents doesn't exist. But it still doesn't work. Parts of my codes is as follows: in NVPTXTest.h namespace llvm { void initializeNVPTXTestPass(PassRegistry &r); class NVPTXTest : public ModulePass { public:

On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:47 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Paul wrote: > > I'm trying to pass an array pointer to my run-time generated module, and > > after a long time of searching for the answer, the only thing I got was > > a headache. Basically I have a few arrays (few megabytes which will > > sometimes be accessed as 8 / 16 / 32 / 64 bit

I understood your modules and I see as them can be used in LNT. But there are some question about old features. 1. With Makefiles we can write pass and collect some statistics. There was an example of branch pass. Metrics can be collected by @-$(LOPT) -load dcc888$(SHLIBEXT) -branch-counter -stats \ -time-passes -disable-output $< 2>>$@ in makefile. In report file we write how

On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:55 AM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following > assertion: > > test: > /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h: > 226: > AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, > llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion

Sorry for the delay. Yeah, that error message is a bit confusing. What's happening is that your pass sequence is invalid. Once the IR has been lowered to machine code, its too late to run LLVM IR passes (ModulePass, FunctionPass, CallGraphSCCPass, etc.). At that point, you need to run a Machine*Pass, e.g. MachineFunctionPass. If you need to run an IR level pass, you need to use

> On May 26, 2016, at 7:08 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I understood your modules and I see as them can be used in LNT. But there are some question about old features. > 1. With Makefiles we can write pass and collect some statistics. There was an example of branch pass. Metrics can be collected by > @-$(LOPT) -load

Hi Elena, > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? There are two test drivers in LNT. "lnt runtests nt" uses the old Makefile-based system and "lnt runtests test-suite" uses the new cmake-based system. It sounds like you are using the former and should switch to the latter.

Hi, The following arbitrary example makes the code generators to get stuck (llvmc won't return from command line, Jit won't return from function call) Basically it is a CFG with circles, (the function will return by comparing a branch counter to a threshold on runtime - see the "Brancher" blocks below) Any idea what goes wrong? Is it a bug in llvm ? ; ModuleID =

Hi Matthias, Thank you for your answer. But can you answer for some more questions? First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? As I understood lit will run and collect all metrics, but there is no opportunity to make any settings for choosing what metrics I would like to collect. Test reports files allow to

Hi Björn I made a workaround for this specific issue a long time ago for the Projucer C++ JIT Engine. It basically forwards the call to another stub that provides enough space to encode a full 64-bit address. The patch is based on LLVM 3.9, so I guess it won't work out-of-the-box on a recent release, but it may give you enough hints to figure it out on your own:

Hello LLVM team, our software FluidSIM (www.fluidsim.de) simulates pneumatic, hydraulic and electric circuits. For the mathematical models we use the language Modelica (www.modelica.org). We developed our own Modelica simulator which solves the dynamical created algebraic differential equation systems. One tool is our small JIT compiler, which compiles mathematical expressions like “2*x0 +

So here is my manifest: class aguu { exec { "update": command => "apt-get update", path => "/usr/bin/" } exec { "upgrade": command => "apt-get upgrade -y", path => "/usr/bin/" } } It it supposed to run apt-get update + upgrade

Hey Lang and Stefan, Using dllimport on my “planschiValue” actually worked! But I have no idea why, because the relocation is still a REL32 if I use dumpbin… So how is it possible for that to work? However… when I load an COFF object file, am I able to change the relocations to dllimport somehow? I honestly can’t imagine how this would work since the machine code is probably already adjusted to