similar to: multiple kernel routing tables & sendmsg

Hi all I am a newbie to routing and I have a problem. I am trying to setup a Load Balanced router with the help of Advanced Routing and iproute2. I came across netsane script(http://muse.linuxmafia.org/netsane/) and Christopher Simon''s nano how to which told me some basic steps to do so. As i follwed these I ran into a few questions and problems. 1. Is it possible that I have no default

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

Hi all I need to use three 512 kbps aDSL internet connections, in a load-sharing, link-failover scenario. Presently I am using Ipcop with a single DSL. Now, I seem to have two options...one..an Edimax quad wan port adsl router, with firewalling and NAT and second install a minimal linux distro for routing...something on the lines of LARTC....and keep NATTING, IDS & Firewalling on the linux

Hi, I am using Fedora Core 3 kernel 2.6.9.The max limit on routing tables is 255(5 of them are reserved ,0,1,253,254,255 ).I am using iproute2 utility for managing routes.I want to increase the max limit of routing tables to 1000(min.).Is there some solution for it? Or some patch available? Or it cannot be achieved. thanks in advance for your response. Regards, Hari

Hi. The task: 1. There 3 servers and a router with 2 PPPoE connections (let call them: ppp0, ppp1). 2. There are several groups of Inet-clients to be served (Servers, Clients and Club). 3. The task is: - to route Club through the ppp1; - to Servers and Clients through ppp0; (Next is reproduced from memory and may be slightly incorrect) router # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table

Hello, I have tested a simple thing in two version of Linux and there was a problem when I have used fwmark as a selector for rule lookups. As you can see below on the Slack, the <test> table doesn''t have any label about fwmark. Is there an iproute problem? -------------------------------------- # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) # uname -r 2.6.5-1.358 #

Dear all, First please excuse me for my very bad english. I''m curently setting up a gateway (linux 2.6.7) with load balancing ( multipath ). I access them from lan and my external interfaces are NATed. I''m used iproute2 as described in the LARTC and nano howto. My problem is that connections are well balanced but often, long connection are break because the default route

In its current configuration one of our Linux boxes has 2 DSL modems that connect to the same service provider. On the router packets coming in from the network destined for the internet are marked alternating using nth match those packets are supposed to be picked up by iproute2 and routed out the physical connections based on that mark, thereby doubling the outbound bandwidth. The problem is

Hello all, Does anyone know of a methodology to build a route based on the inbound and outbound interfaces as opposed to ip addresses? We are essentially trying to forward packets from one interface to another without looking at the ip address. Bridging (brctl, br2684ctl) will not work in this case as the interfaces use different layer 2 encapsulation (e.g., atm0<=>eth0, or

Hello all, I''m using iproute2 + ipchains and have a question about locally generated packets. I have noticed that I have no problem marking packets in the input chain from sources other than my router. These packets are marked and routed exactly as I expect. Now supposing I want to mark particular outbound packets which are locally generated. The only solution I have found so far

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1

Hi, I have emailed the list before (email can be found here http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q4/017220.html) regarding this matter. Basically, I am trying to set up a router for my college, to route conference guests over an adsl line, and students over an academic connection. I''ve looked at man ip(8), and a few examples, and think I have a configuration that will work, but was

List members; I have been reading the digest for some time now and I would like to ask some conceptual questions. I am a telecommunications systems designer and not a software guy, but I have tried and used a number of the tools availabel in the LARTC and Iptables, and many of the other great things included in Linux. We are designing commercial products and I don''t want to ask my

Hello all, I am having some difficults to make a routing rule work. I want that every P2P packages go to one interface (eth2 - cheaper link) nad the rest of the traffic go to another interface (eth0 - frame relay very expensive). I am using this script to make the mark and balance: ------- #!/bin/bash IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables" IP="/sbin/ip" #---- # Declara redes #----

Hello, for the past couple of days i''ve been banging my head against a wall trying to get this iproute2 issue resolved. the basic scenario is as follows. eth0 - external ip eth1 - internal ip i''m forwarding an external ip to the internal interface at a port that''s responding. i can connect to the internal ip just fine. %telnet 10.x.x.x 25 Trying 10.x.x.x...

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

Hello, I am writing a routing daemon that is able to assign different gateways to a destination address for different classes of service. Multiple DiffServ Code Point values are mapped into a single class of service. I have accomplished this by using the iptables MARK target to label each packet with a class of service value and then using ''ip rule add fwmark'' to have each

Hello all, I am going through the LARTC howto to understand how the iproute2 works. But some concepts like Policy Routing, RPDB etc are not clear to me. I am pretty new to iproute, beeing using route command for long... From what I understand 1. rules (ip rule) tell how to select packets for routing and route (ip route) tell where to route the selected packets. 2. A collection of rules is