similar to: CQB & links of varying capacity

HI!! I''m use CBQ script for retrict bandwidth, but i need to priorize some traffic, ¿how i do it? In my case, i need that all trafic from 192.168.0.100/29 (marked with iptables) have higher priority. Thanks --

finally I put my video in theora on our website , at 250 kbps , quality is better than Xvid ! http://www.marseille-wireless.org/spip/article.php3?id_article=60 I still need to make a high definition version ( few Mbits ) and a dialup modem one ( ogg 20k + theora 40 k ) I just ha this problem that my video has not the right dimansion mith WMP or mplayer , will have to see why the dimension

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hi I am search a sample config for my linux box: Shorewall 3.2.3 Eth0 => Internet Access 4Mbits on ethernet Eth1 => Lan Eth2 => Lan 2 Eth3 => Lan 3 i want limit the internet access: Eth1 = 2 Mbits Eth2 = 0,5 Mbits Eth3 = 1,5 Mbits but if eth1 don''t use 2 Mbits other lan can use it anyone have a simple sample config for help me ? Thanks bye

Hi, I am testing tinc for a very large scale deployment. I am using tinc-1.1 for testing. test results below are for tinc in switch mode. all other settings are default. test is performed in LAN env. 2 different hosts. I am getting only 24.6 Mbits/sec when tinc is used. without tinc on the same hosts/link I get 95 to 100 Mbits/sec using iperf. Over Tinc: iperf -c 192.168.9.9 -b 100m -l 32k -w

Hello all! I have a small LAN at home and when someone starts to download (only one), interractive traffic (www, chat and online games) is impossible with standard kernel queues setup... So I started to shape. My ISP gives me a 512 kbits link to the Internet and a 100 Mbits link to some of the other big ISPs in my country. If I set the rate of the parent htb qdisc at 512 kbits, I will never use

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are

Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc ''that is also below''. The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external network. Both tests were run at the same time. The links are policed at 6.0M ''by our provider''. 192.168.70.1 --> 192.168.30.1 My question is: If using a prio qdisc should''nt the iperf run with a tos of b8 have

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

connection will remain a TCP connection unless it is broken and restarted. Usually if I stop the client and wait for about 30 seconds to reconnect, there is a much greater chance that the MTU probes work fine, and in about 30 seconds MTU is fixed to 1416. Every time when the MTU probing fails, I see latency between 700 - 1000 ms with 32 byte pings over a LAN. Every time when the MTU probing does

I'm only doing one frame using speex_encode_int greatly simplifies my code I'm not sure why the sample I was working off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) {

Hi, I am using the speex 1.0.4 library from Windows. I have posted my problem before but didn't get a solution. I am doing an VOIP project in which i am recording sound and streaming it to the peer. I wanted to encode and decode wav files that brought me to this site. I am recording sound in the following format:- m_WaveFormatEx.wFormatTag = WAVE_FORMAT_PCM;

I'm getting garbled playback with decoded fragments and I'm hoping someone here can point me in the right direction to correcting the problem. Essentially I'm capturing audio from the microphone. I stream it over the net, but for testing purposes with this API I'm just grabbing the whole chunk and encoding / decoding it right away and then updating the sound buffer for

Hello, I made some tests with HTB, and i usually set MTU to the default value of TCP_WMEM (that is 65536 for me). I have this case : 50 Mbits/s 10 Mbits/s A----------------------------------B---------------------------------------C if A send to B, bandwidth is about 50 Mbits/s if B send to C, bandwidth is about 10 Mbits/s But if A send to C,

Whoops, left this message in my outbox. I managed to fix the problem. Apparently I was only copying 160 bytes (Frame Size) back into the audio stream when I should have been copying 320 (chars <-> shorts confused me there). Hence why I could hear myself yet it was distorted. Half the wav was missing =) To answer some of the other questions here, for any insight into what I'm doing:

Hi, I''ve managed to create a web based interface to some of the advanced routing capabilities in Linux. Currently it is functional (and pretty, i think :) although far from perfect. I''m looking for people with better programming skills and/or understandings of advanced routing concepts in Linux than I have who''d like to help out with the project. The overall goals

Hi, I have just started to work with Xen and have a question regarding the expected network throughput. Here is my configuration: Processor: 2.8 GHz Intel Celeron (Socket 775) Motherboard: Gigabyte 8I865GVMF-775 Memory: 1.5 GB Basic system: Kubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake Xen version: 3.02 (Latest 3.0 stable download) I get the following iperf results: Src Dest Throughput Dom0 Dom0

The way I do this is to compute the number of frames (by dividing the size of my input by the number of bytes per frame and then calling speex_encode_int() that many times. Something like speex_bits_reset( &bits ); for( n = 0; n < num_frames; ++n ) { speex_encode_int( enc_state, (int16_t*)input_tail,

Hi all. We have a performance problem over a 2 Mbits radio link. The configuration is as follows: we have a RH Linux 6.1 (double PIII processor, 100 mbit ethernet, raid 5), acting as a server for a network of Windows 95, 98 and NT. On the local network I can achieve up to 40 mbits transferring large files from the server to a windows 98 machine. This network is connected through a 2 mbits radio