similar to: around_filter and with_scope

I want to run a single filter in my application.rb file, and then if a certain condition is true, end the action''s processing immediately. Right now I''m using prepend_before_filter to ensure that it gets run first, but some of my around_filters are still being processed. Is there a way that I can clear out all the filters that should be run? Basically it''ll look

Hi, It seems that setting a with_scope on the parent class doesn''t do anything MyClass.with_scope(:find=>{:conditions=> ["somecol = ?", ''val'']}) do @ext_pages, @ext_rows = paginate :my_extended_class, { :per_page => 13 } end # this doesn''t generate WHERE somecol=''val'' In order for scope to work you have to call

Hello, I just finished writing a plugin for Rails that I''m annoucing the first release here: meantime_filter. It is descibed at http://roman2k.free.fr/rails/meantime_filter/0.1.0/ rdoc/ (See the end of this message for getting it.) ABOUT THE PLUGIN It extends ActionController to add the functionnality of having filters run at the action call time. This new type of filter yields

In a Rails controller I set the scope on a model class in an around filter. I have defined expectations on the model classes, and ideally, I would add a further expectation for the scope. Is this already possible in some way? How would I go about adding support a scope expectation? Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:michael at schuerig.de http://www.schuerig.de/michael/

Hi, I was wondering if there is a feature or construct in rails that is guaranteed to run after an action like an around_filter (or after_filter) but will still run regardless of a broken filter chain or thrown exception? Currently I have an around filter setup, and I really require the after part of the filter to run, although if the filter chain is broken via cacheing or an exception is

So, I hear that with_scope is going to be deprecated. Which is a bit of a shame, given the stuff I''ve been writing recently. I have a CMS with multiple clients. A ''client'' is essentially a company, with multiple users. Content on the site belongs to a client - content could be messages, images, schedules, etc etc. People belonging to one client should not be able

(I''ve had this patch lying around for a couple of weeks, waiting for Trac to come back up. noradio''s already had a look at it on IRC. What''s the best way to submit patches while Trac is down?) with_scope doesn''t support :order in the presence of :include. For example: {{{ # We''re testing the interaction between :order, :include, and

Hi there, I have something like the following: class Person < AR:B ... ... has_many :votes has_many :chosen_answers, :through => :votes, :source => :answer, :select => ''DISTINCT answers.*'' do def my_answers(whodunnit) chosen_answers.with_scope(:find => { :conditions => [ "votes.created_by=?", whodunnit ] }) do chosen_answers.find :all

>From what i can gather the with_scope feature doesn''t allow you to specify which columns get selected. It appears to default to "*". So if i specify something like: Question.with_scope( :find => { :from => "questions q, answers a", :conditions => "q.owner = a.owner AND a.owner=1" }) do ... end I''ll generate SQL like: SELECT *

Has anyone successfully gotten the scoped_access[1] plugin to work in Rails 1.1? Some of the methods it was relying on are now no longer accessible. It seems the only way to add scope is to use the ''with_scope'' method that takes a block, but since Rails doesn''t have real around filters[2] I cannot see a way of adding a scope using a filter. Anyone using with_scope

I''m using restful_authentication in my app and I have the before filters in my application rhtml: before_filter :login_required around_filter :set_timezone around_filter :catch_errors Currently I have them commented out while rspec''in but I''ll need to add them in my specs. def create @ticket = Ticket.new(params[:ticket]) @ticket.user = current_user if

There are areas of my application that "want" to use a url structure like domain/<human_readable_param>/<Module>/<Controller>/<Action>/<Id> Please note that the human readable parameter I need to inject is NOT related to the <id> being used by the action/controller pair. It''s identifying a container object whose contains are operated

Hello everyone, I was trying to set up access control in a new application Im working on, I''m trying to use the excellent authorization plugin from Bill Katz, Its pretty straight forward to setup and should be to use. But when i try to give the same permission on two differents users on the same object i get an error. (Well , Im kinda new to all this rails stuff) r = Red.find(1) u1 =

I have the following code: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :requests do def find_active(options = {}) with_scope :find => { :conditions => ["requests.active = ?", true] } do find(:all, options) end end end end Executing user.requests.find_active results in the following SQL: SELECT * FROM requests WHERE (( requests.user_id = 10 ) AND (

Why does with_scope work with .create, .find, but not with .new? It breaks all scaffolded code :( -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi It would seem that the scoped_access plugin from http://wota.jp/svn/rails/plugins/branches/stable/scoped_access is incompatible with Rails 2.0.2. /home/httpd/rails/demoone/vendor/plugins/scoped_access/init.rb:18:in `alias_method'' undefined method `prepare_application'' for class `Class'' ( NameError ) from

Still new to Specs... How do I create a spec to test a model method? Specifically, here is my spec: #testing model describe User do it "should have many user roles" do User.reflect_on_association(:user_roles).should_not be_nil end it "should have many roles though user roles" do User.reflect_on_association(:roles).should_not be_nil end it "should know

I''m dynamically generating menu options based on the currently logged in user: current_user. My menus are setup on the applicatin.rhtml file. The current_user is defined in the application controller. But, attempting to assign it a value while in the application controller results in an ''undefined method'' error. ApplicationController .... def current_user @cu =

Do you know of any way for me to stick a meta tag in using a before_filter or after_filter or around_filter? <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5"/> I have been trying to figure out out and just cannot make sense of it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hi,- I am looking for a clean and secure way for an ActiveRecord instance to delete itself. Say I have a User model in my app. Then the destructive action would be /users/user_id/destroy. If this action is not secured by a filter like: (*) before_filter :check_administrator_role, :only => :destroy then any user could potentially log in and start issuing: /users/1/destroy /users/2/destroy .