similar to: Two outbound links, switching after threshold is reached.

hi all, Iam using the following CBQs to limit the FTP bandwidth pease tell what changes are rquired to make it work.... tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq allot 1514 avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq allot 1514 bandwidth 100Mbit rate .4Mbit weight .4 prio 2 maxburst 20 cell 8 avpkt 1000 tc class add dev eth0

Hello ALL, is there a way to have a device independent qdisc, or a qdisc on some kind of virtuall interface? Background: I have a 5-Interface-Router with one Internet-Uplink. The Router should connect the clients on the other Interfaces to the Internet and to each other client. As i understood the hole TC stuff i can only get influence of outgoing traffic. In my case i can reduce the traffic of

As of RC3 and RC4, I've noticed that winbindd's wb_getpwuid function is using the form <FQDN-domain><winbind-seperator><username>, and before, it was simply <NetBIOS-domain><winbind-seperator><username>. The net effect of what I'm seeing is that users which have a UNIX account locally on the samba box and also a domain account are being

About a month ago, I setup a Windows 2000 native-mode domain, and had a couple of Linux machines join the active directory. I followed the steps outlined in the Samba 3.0 docs regarding winbind/PAM/NSS. The machines joined the domain fine, and 'wbinfo -t', as well as 'wbinfo -u/-g' and 'getent passwd/group' return expected results. Connecting from other Windows clients

While testing the latest Samba3.0.0beta3, I notice that if I don't specify a password server winbind appears to look it up via DNS, and with two DCs, picks one. However, my krb5.conf specifies a particular Kerberos server (one of the two DCs), and so occasionally, winbind will pick the first DC, and kerberos uses the other. When this happens, I can't seem to connect to any shares on the

Hi! I''ve got two FreeS/WAN gateways setup, with one subnet<->subnet tunnel setup, which is working fine. I''ve setup iproute2 to route anything for either subnet via the ipsec0 device using a src address of the local interface. This is to force locally generated traffic (ie, traffic generated on the server) to go through the VPN, rather than out with a source IP of the

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this one. Ever since beta3 I've been unable to get wbinfo to work properly. I finally worked around it today, and it seems that with the disable netbios = yes parameter in my smb.conf file, I get no results. Commenting out that parameter seems to work fine. It looks like the DNS queries for DCs is unsuccessful without NetBIOS enabled. I'm

On Oct 2, 2019, at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > Is there a bug filed on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/> yet? Have you submitted the errors you encountered anywhere? Since no one else chimed in, I did some googling, and it looks like someone has already filed a bug that looks pretty similar:

Hello, Is it a Plan to correct the Broken mdadm and or driver for Intel Chipset C602, my Server SuperMicro Board X9SRi-F have a Problem with the new C8 or RH8 ? With C7 I can install Centos with no Problem? Have any a workaround or is it planed a Update for this Problem Thanks for a answer, -- mit freundlichen Gr?ssen / best regards, G?nther J. Niederwimmer

OS is smeserver, based on CentOS/RHEL 4. After update to samba 3.0.25b (included in RHEL U6) users who had "mapped" their home in Network places were unable to access the share. All other shares worked. On every attempt a line similar to the following was logged: Feb 14 10:11:49 nethservice smbd[6258]: '/home/e-smith/files/users/FRANCESCA/home' does not exist or permission

I need to route: from 196.33.50.0/25 (default route) to ISP1 from 196.33.248.0/24 (default route) to ISP2 ISP1 --------- fire --+---- 196.33.248.0/24 / | ISP2 --------/ +---- router ----- router ----- 196.33.50.0/25 What I''ve done: Default route via ISP1 created routing table ISP2 for default route via ISP2 I would like to do the following but they get

Hi, I am migrating from one ISP to another, and would like to run both simultaneously for a while. So: (both netmask 255.255.255.248) [ISP1] 24.106.62.180 [ISP2] 209.181.237.230 | | | | \ / -----[ HUB ]----- | | -------- eth0 --------- | Linux FW/Server | ---------eth1 --------- | | [ HUB ] | 10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0 The default IP on

Hello everybody: Here is my "network layout": ISP1 ISP2 | | | | +-----eth0---------eth1------+ | | | FC 3 box | | | +-----eth2---------eth3------+ |

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

Hello, Thanks for the great Shorewall which has replaced my hard to maintain home-made scripts. First, what works. Our local network is 10.48.X.X with multiple vlan, each on a dedicated interface. We use Shorewall 4.4.11 from Debian Squeeze. We have a 2 ISP: - isp1 : an optical fiber provider with 10 Mbps. - isp2 : a DSL provider with 15Mbits/1Mbits. We use isp2 as the default outgoing

Hello, I''m being confrunted with the following situation and I''m trying to find the simplest solution possible as to also be easier to manage. 1) I have: ISP1 ------ S1 (linux) S1''s got: 512kbits external bandwidth from ISP1 20Mbits MAN bandwidth not including ISP2 17Mbit tunnel connection which provider : 1 Mbit external bandwidth and 16Mbit MAN bandwidth with

I set up this config: +------+ -+ ISP1 +--+ +------+ | +-------+ +--+ linux | +------+ | +-------+ -+ ISP2 +--+ +------+ No problem. Standard setup with two ISP''s. Both routed subnets. Default gateway is ISP1. No magic here. Now I put a server behind the Linux box. I want the server to be reachable on an /extra/ IP in the routed subnet of ISP2. +------+ -+ ISP1

Hi all, I have managed to setup a Fedora 7 box with 3 ethernet cards and two ADSL modem/routers from different suppliers as LARTC recommends. I am able to direct traffic for specific internal IPs either to one or the other ADSL line. However, I am faced with two problems I am struggling for the solution: 1. I have opened a few ports on the ADSL router/firewalls to talk to internal hosts; say when

Hi, Reward offered: 50$ (paypal), and I am sure this is a ridiculous thing I have missing. My goal: On a 2 NIC Asterisk box, to send packets that came in Asterisk on NIC1 back to NIC 1, and NIC2 back to NIC 2. (basically, send them back the same way they came from). I have been doing what was recommended to me and mangling packets left and right. I have reached a point where I am