similar to: Difficulties in understanding Rail-Plugins in depth

I am trying to write a plugin, ''acts_as_commentable'', for my models - Image, Book, Music and so on, I do not want to use polymorphic association, so very model should have its own comment class. Here is my code acts_as_commentable.rb module Commentable def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) end module ClassMethods def

I now have the acts_as_commentable plugin up on RubyForge. This plugin will allow you to add comments to any active_record object in your Rails application. So far the directions are simple, and there are only a few features: To install: ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org//var/svn/commentable/acts_as_commentable In the readme there is a sample migration you will need to use, with

I want to iterate ?nodes? and ?leafs? for a yaml document: thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user.rb user.rb:6: undefined method `[]'' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from user.rb:5:in `each_key'' from user.rb:5 thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user2.rb user2.rb:5: undefined method `[]'' for

Hi,, I am facing problem during act as commentable plugin. i had follwed these two links http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2006/06/18/acts-as-commentable-plugin/ http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2006/07/09/comments-on-acts-as-commentable/ error undefined method order in comment_methods.rb. shall create commentable model?

I am facing strange problem. I have an object @part=MainPart.find(:all) 1. @part.each_with_index do |mainpart,index| 2. <p><%= mainpart.object_id%></p> 3. end Here problem is that object_id is reserved for rails. Here object_id field in my table . Now i want to get value <%= mainpart.object_id%> is giving GARBAGE VALUE. Is there any solution apart from

I''m getting this very weird error and I can''t figure out what the problem is. I''m using acts_as_commentable. Basically, I have a partial with this code in it: <div id="<%= ''#{comment.commentable_type}_comment_# {comment.commentable_id}'' %>" class="comment"> <dl> <dt><%= link_to comment.user.login,

This came up from an other issue where I needed to go check something in test::unit. Immediately when I dropped into the debugger in test::unit I saw something I have been missing: test unit by default shows a number of lines of code. Is there a way to make the rspec debugger do this? I am not sure if it is just me, but seems to me that when I moved to rspec, certain things which seemed to be

Hi all, I recently started back up with Rails and things are going well up until now. I''ve set up acts_as_commentable in my Post model and it''s working great. Problem is users are able to create a "blank" comment. I''ve added the following validations in the comment.rb file generated by acts_as_commentable to limit the comment length: [code]

I''m now in the process of facing converting a rails app to use Ruby 1.9.1. Has anyone figured out how to use 1.9 with the RSpec bundle in textmate and preferably how to switch back and forth? -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn:

Hi guys. I''m setting an expectation on a class method. For some reason, the method isn''t being stubbed, and the expectation isn''t seeing the call. In KeywordListsController#create, I call the private method #create_keywords_and_associate, which calls AdSenseHeavenParser#parse . Thus, some of my specs set an expectation on AdSenseHeavenParser#parse . However, that

I finally plunked down for the beta RSpec bundle and I''m working through the initial example. Although I''m a fairly experienced RSpec user, I''m stlll learning new tricks. Anyway, I''m going though the mastermind example, and everything is going well, except that I decided to also try out the Textmate bundle for Cucumber. I decided to use Ben Mabey''s

Passenger configuration selects which ruby executable to use via a global configuration variable (at least for Apache, I assume it''s the same for Nginx). I''m in a situation where I''ve got at least one rails app I''d like to run on 1.9 while others remain on 1.8. This is for my development machine running OS X 10.6. Normally I just use the Passenger PrefPane,

Hi there, I love the acts_as_* family that rails uses. I''ve also found I can create something similar by dropping the following code into my activerecord classes: class MyClass < ActiveRecord::Base class << self alias_method :count_with_unapproved, :count end def self.find(*args) options = extract_options_from_args!(args) if options[:conditions].nil? options[:conditions] =

Hello. I''ve read about examples on inheritance with rails. Here is an example: http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2006/06/03/rails-single-table-inheritance/ The way is to add a type field in the table. So if I have an Animal class with an attribute name, I can inherit from this class like: Dog < Animal, Cat < Animal, and so on. With the type field in the table I can do Dog.all,

Hi, I''ve got a problem on which I''ve spent many hours, and I can''t get a clue on what is happening... I hope someone here will be able to help me. Here is the situation : my Rails app uses acts_as_commentable and acts_as_bookmarkable on a Diagram model. Everything''s working OK individually: I can create a comment on a Diagram, bookmark it, and so on. Now,

Hey all, I get an undefined method `join'' for #<String NoMethodError. student.rb has_one :student_fail attr_accessor :student_fail_attribute #controller def student_fail @student = @student.find params[:id] def update_student_fail @student.build_student_fail params[:student][:student_fail_attribute] if @student.save #view form_for @student do |f|

i just ran into a problem with some test, and i am not exactly sure why, but the difference happened when i changed my model validation from: validate :custom_validation to: validate_on_create :custom_validation can someone give me any ideas on where in the chain the validation takes place? thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Un bon job de Developpeur Expérimenté Ruby on Rails, sur logiciel marketing digital, équipe pro, Paris 2, Sté Cotée, Paris Rou SiliconValley. Veuillez consulter le lien suivant pour plusieurs détails: http://www.people-centric.fr/2010/01/27/type/6368-job-developpeur-ruby.html/fr/ Cordialement, Roxana Stefan Malene Chargée de recrutement en IT Mail:

Along the same lines as the default javascript library discussion [1], why don''t we switch the default test library to RSpec? The stats [2] posted by Xaviar in the other thread seem to support that RSpec is the preferred way to test. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/e9b9cf2233d9a59b [2] http://survey.hamptoncatlin.com/survey/stats -- You received

Why are there more web design users using PHP instead of using Rails? Is there an advantage using PHP over Rails? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.