similar to: TCP MSS clampage

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "TCP MSS clampage"

2002 Feb 25
10
Clamping tcp mss values to decrease latency
Hello, I have an interesting question. I can''t find a solution anywhere to this problem. I have an adsl connection which is able to send a full data packet in about 150ms. I want to cut this time down to decrease latency while serving files, so I thought I''d try and reduce the packet size for the offending upload streams (my webserver). The trick is that I also want all other
2003 Jun 02
3
[jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us: MSS clamping doesn''t work with masquerading through VPN?]
I sent the message below to this list over a week ago, and I haven''t seen any response. If this is not the correct forum for my question, can anyone suggest a better person or place to which I should direct it? Thank you, Jonathan Kamens ------- Start of forwarded message ------- From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] MSS
2004 Sep 22
2
Trouble with mails and connections through ADSL
Hello every one, first time poster, four month shorewaller ;) As the subject states, I''ve been experienced the infamous trouble described in the next excerpt from shorewall.conf # MSS CLAMPING # # Set this variable to "Yes" or "yes" if you want the TCP "Clamp MSS to PMTU" # option. This option is most commonly required when your internet # interface is some
2004 Nov 11
5
URGENT!! some large websites cant be surfered
Clients: Some sites just show the top area not the full page. Some sites cant be reached at all. I think it 90% may be the MTU/MSS problem. But I already have set the shorewall.conf CLAMPMSS=1400 or CLAMPMSS=Yes, but it doest make things good. I would be mad. Anybody helps me would so appreciated! If you want know more info. to diag my problem, I would be please to.
2016 Mar 20
8
[Bug 1058] New: Add clamp MSS to MTU
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1058 Bug ID: 1058 Summary: Add clamp MSS to MTU Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:
2007 Apr 17
6
[Bug 554] Packet illegaly bypassing SNAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 ------- Additional Comments From fhagur@gmail.com 2007-04-17 05:04 MET ------- I have been wondering about this bug and had similar problems myself here in my Debian system, linux-kernel 2.6.18 iptables 1.3.6. I too saw that some packets became transmitted illegally through the ppp0 interface, when they just shoudn't. What I
2004 May 31
3
Re: Re: how to realize "MLPPP LFI" on linux
Hi,Andy Thank your very much! For the MLPPP LFI,I found that in Cisco configuration,it use "ppp multilink;ppp multilink fragmentation;ppp multilink fragment-delay 20;ppp multilink interleave " command to enable MLPPP LFI.So I think just realizing the same function on my linux router would be fine.But I got no idea how to do this on linux.So is there anything with iproute2?Would you
2013 Mar 11
1
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-xxx for CHAP PPPoE
Hi all I get a Cisco 1841 router, connecting the office through a CHAP PPPoE link: [...] interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated ip mtu 1492 ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly encapsulation ppp ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap callin ppp chap hostname username at isp ppp chap password 0 s0meStr0ngP4sswd [...] As
2004 Jun 10
1
multiple connections
Hello, I have an issue with multiple connections to the Internet. I tried following the steps described in [1] but things are not working properly. I would like the network setup as follows: ______ | |- ppp0 -- Dynamic IP (PPPoE on eth2) Internal---- eth0 | GW | |____|- eth1 -- Static IP -> Static''s GW From [1], the
2014 May 30
2
ot: identifying TB IMAP issues
I have a user with with W7/TBird/IMAP to my dovecot 2.1.17 server, the user complains whilst he is composing lengthy emails (with multiple fowrds/replies quoted in the message) he gets 'hour glass' over compose windows with some message about not being able to save drafts, he then powers off ADSL modem, which enables him to continue composing email, powers on ADSL, and sends email what
2004 Feb 17
1
Setting MSS
Hi I have a (bizarre) problem with ssh, which someone has suggested may be down to the MSS value being too high. I know that within Shorewall I can clamp the MSS value to the MTU-40 value, but is there a way I can set MSS to a discreet value? I just want to (dis)prove the MSS theory at the moment (I know it isn''t a real fix). Thanks, Keith
2004 Aug 20
1
some websites cant be reached
I have an internet router powered by gentoo+shorewall2.0.7+adsl(pppoe) but my clients(and gateway) cant access some websites----these sites must be okay,other sites are okay. The I believe it is caused by MTU or MSS, but I have no idea yet. Btw, the unaccessable sites are dynamic, it says: today I cant access www.oracle.com nextday I redail--to get another ip,I can access www.oracle.com. Help!
2008 Feb 08
1
Reg. PPPoE server installation
Hi all, I am trying to install the PPPoe server rp-pppoe-3.8 from Roaring penguin on centos PC (Centos 4.3, Kernel release 2.6.9-34.EL) but not able to start it. When I start it it gives the error-- /etc/rc.d/init.d/pppoe status pppoe-status: Link is down (can't read pppd PID file /var/run/pppoe.conf-pppoe.pid.pppd) ror - /etc/rc.d/init.d/pppoe start Bringing up PPPoE
2007 Feb 05
2
tc filter matches ip fileds inside pppoe frames
I have a requirement which I guess it is not too unusually, however I haven''t quite figured out how to do it and couldn''t find any examples which handle that. I have made myself a Linux-based bridge, eth0 bridged with eth1 to form br0. In this bridge, I run ''tc'' script to handle QoS. So far nothing unusual. However, what''s different is that this
2007 Nov 22
1
Re: pppoe domU: did you test userspace rp-pppoe?
Peter Jakobi wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > you already tested an ancient userspace-only rp-pppoe? > I''ve still one active, and trying this you could validate > your the rest of your setup, before looking at possible > kernel changes anew (strace, ltrace, logs, whatever)... > Hi Peter. No I did not. Do I have to compile it? Can you give me more info what to do?
2004 Sep 22
2
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 47
I said: > # MSS CLAMPING > # Your kernel must have CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS set. > > I''ve activated the option, but to no result watsoever. > Checked my kernel config, and it states that CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS is a > loadable module, that should be loaded on demand. > Simon said: > Did you try adding it to /etc/shorewall/modules ? Actually, no I
2017 Aug 03
1
[Bug 1165] New: Feature Request - Clamp MTU to MSS
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 Bug ID: 1165 Summary: Feature Request - Clamp MTU to MSS Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2006 May 05
2
Matching interface using U32(?)
Hello all, I am trying to make a little bit more complex QoS/Shapping form and I need to shape a PPPoE conection that I serve to my clients. So this is the scope: client connects using pppoe so it gets an IP address (from pppoe pool) and open an interface into my linux box interface for this client is ppp0 client has got an ip 1.1.1.2/32 and it is poiting to pppoe-server 1.1.1.1 So,
2003 Aug 08
1
Two ADSL lines with PPPoE in one server.
Hello, My system is: Server with Slackware 8.1 LINUX, ADSL Internet with PPPoE connection, and I masquerade my LAN. I use "Roaring Penguin" PPPoE client for my ADSL connection. I would like to connect another ADSL line (also PPPoE) to my server and have two lines, because I want to make "Simple source policy routing", as described in LARTC HOWTO. How should I set up my
2006 Apr 11
2
Shaping per IP in PPPoE
hi all. i am currently now serving PPPoE in my area. i had a script generated from tcng that worked perfectly before i started serving PPPoE. the issue is not in the script it self BUT in that "tc" code is not shaping on the ethernet anymore BUT INSTEAD on the pppX devices. I tested it and talking jargon, what should i do? The issue is that for each PPPoE login, PPPoE-server