similar to: File security

Hi everyone, I would need to know if RoR follow any policy for version naming; I mean, something like linux´s kernel does or similar. For instance, kernel uses numbers separated in groups by dots (i.e. pre 2.6 - AA.BB.CC). These groups mean differents fixtures, bugs fixed... I will start a big proyect from scratch with rails and I want to choose now a standart to use and avoid future problems

I see at some point recipes were changed from project-associated to stage-associated, is there some explanation or examples of that use-case? Could I request we have both? In my current cap scripts, we don''t have any stage-specific recipes, but maybe I''m just not understanding this completely. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Jonathan Weiss

Hello, I''ve install ror/mongrel etc, etc on a linux server (rhes). As i''m not root, all package startinf from ruby have been install into ~/gconf/usr ruby-1.8.6 and all of this gem package: -r-xr--r-- 1 dimnce dba 168448 Aug 9 14:53 rails-1.2.3.gem -r-xr--r-- 1 dimnce dba 84480 Aug 9 14:56 rake-0.7.3.gem -r-xr--r-- 1 dimnce dba 217088

Hello all, I''m a RoR fan. I''ve read some RoR books, and I''m starting to use RoR for commercial proyects. As I use RoR more and more, I think about inexistent tools that would be great to have when developing applications in RoR. For example: an IDE with more features than RadRails. So then I think "hey! you could produce one of these tools". Some of these

I have two users on my network, Mary and Bob, who work together in a shared share. They both belong to the group Accounting. Bob is a savvy Linux user who accesses the share via NFS4. Mary toils away using Windows accessing the share via the Samba server. Mary will create a directory on the share and dump a number of files in which Bob and Mary will split the load. Bob, being a LInux user, will

I'm seeing behavior that I was hoping somebody could explain. I have a share set up that will be a repository for company-wide data. There are three classes of people who can access it, readers, read/writers, and admins. Readers and read/writers are self explanatory, admins have read/write access, and can change the permissions/ownership of files. Read and write access is controlled by

Hi, when I use mod_rails/passenger with apache2 on linux instead of webbrick for our application, then it stops working with certain browsers like the ie, and konqueror but still works with firefox. I get the following error message: ActionView::TemplateError (PGError: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xad HINT: This error can also happen if the byte sequence does

Dear Pals I think all of us in this business (or most) looking at the Corn Flakes Back Side , Wish to find a NAT Friendly VOIP solution. Thats ridiculous I know, but what about this wish list (Personal Point of view) Upnp support for Asterisk STUN Support for Asterisk Small Embedded Asterisk (just to redirect IAX) SIP-IAX , h.323-IAX or something like that , on the End Point. As a Nat

Hello, I''m running fine my application on the dev server with apache2 and mod_rails, but on the production server I have a strange issue.. it seems like something is wrong with httpd.conf of .htacces.. the dev server is a DreamHost PS and I''m configuring the production one one HostGator. I have a public/users/ folder with member profile images and a users controller..

Hi, I recently tried to use the newly released mod_rails (www.modrails.com) for Apache, and discovered it doesn't work on FreeBSD 7. It does however work on FreeBSD 6 just fine. I tracked it down to sendmsg() as detailed here: http://code.google.com/p/phusion-passenger/issues/detail?id=16 The mod_rails/passenger unit tests fail on FD passing, as do the Ruby 1.8.6 standard unit

Hi all, Sorry to repost about this same issue once again, but I'm really at a complete loss as to how to solve the problem with ownership being changed after I've set it. I've set ownership as follows... ( set this by chmod -R 0770 HR, as well as chgroup -R HR-Group, I then signed into a Windows PC that was part of the domain, went to computer management as per the WIKI and chose

I'm using samba as a win2000 domain member and providing some files using posix ACLs My share configuration is like that: [software] path = /srv/software public = yes read only = no printable = no group = root directory security mask = 0777 directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0660 store dos attributes = no dos

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:13:56 +0100 marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I obtaing this resulta. Imposible enumerated the object in the > container: access negated. > Hi Marco, you posted this as your smb.conf: [global] security = ADS workgroup = ROBINOOD realm = ROBINOOD.TST log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 vfs objects = acl_xattr map

Following deeper analysis I have found some permission differences in sysvol policies files, e.g: WORKING: # file: samba/sysvol/company.co.uk/Policies/{274B7BA8-3DBA-43A6-8AC2-D45B5E4054FF}/GPT.INI # owner: 3000000 # group: Domain\040Users user::rwx group::--- group:Domain\040Users:--- group:3000000:rwx group:3000002:rwx group:3000003:r-x group:3000006:rwx group:3000008:rwx group:3000010:r-x

hello! i got this forum powered by apache and mod_rails lately when i create / edit posts, i get plain html text showing up instead of the actual page. here''s what i see: -- Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Set-Cookie: _mysite_session=BAh7CzoOcmV0dXJuX3RvMDoKdGl0bGV7BmkVdToJVGltZQ2IDhuAK1UeADoL %250AdG9waWNzewZpBnU7Bw2HDhuA2%252FZJ7zoJdXNlcmkGIgpmbGFzaElDOidBY3Rp

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare

Hi, I have a problem with my Samba/WinBIND implementation. In folders shared by multiple people the last one to access and modify a file takes ownership of the file and changes the permissions so other users cannot make changes to the same file: [root@atlas PLANNING RECORDS]# cd REGIONAL\ 1\ AIRLINE\ DOCS/ [root@atlas REGIONAL 1 AIRLINE DOCS]# ls -al total 1232 drwxrws---+ 8 root

I believe I have found either a bug or something I do not understand. I recently had a file-share issue and the resolution was to set the "others" permissions to 5, read and execute. The problem with this is that once I am in Windows on a workstation, this appears to allow "Everyone", "CREATOR OWNER", and "CREATOR GROUP" access. We normally setup our

Hi, witch command getent group Domain\ Admins I optaing domain admins:x:10512: It's correct? Il 12/02/2019 12:57, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:13:56 +0100 > marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I obtaing this resulta. Imposible enumerated the object in the >> container: access negated. >> > Hi

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>