Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Using Cucumber with Lockdown"
2008 Aug 09
3
matrix name
Hello,
Presently, we are able to add additionnal info to a matrix
thanks to the nice comment() and attr() functions.
Maybe I miss some other functions ?
Since there is a always a little remaining place on the
top left when one print a matrix,
I was wondering if it won't be interesting to offer the
possibility to show some information here,
I'm thinking on something like :
> attr(M,
2010 May 21
0
Authlogic and Single table inheritance
Hi,
I have some models such as:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authentic
end
class Admin < User
end
class Superadmin < Admin
end
And some controllers such as:
class UserSessionsController < ApplicationController
def new
@user_session = UserSession.new
end
def create
@user_session =
2010 Feb 16
0
Strange routing(?) Issue
I have a Model event and the following two lines in routes.rb
1 - map.connect "events/:action", :controller => ''events'', :action => /
[a-z_]+/i
2 - map.resources :events, :has_many => :comments, :has_one
=> :address #, :collection => {:mapit => :get}
I have #1 so that I can call custom actions from a link_to_remote link
from my index page t0 update a
2008 Feb 28
2
random exception driving me crazy: SecurityError (Insecure: can't modify array)
Hi all, I''m running into a very strange but incredibly annoying
problem that I just can''t seem to solve.
The exception is occurring from a seemingly innocuous line in my code,
a simple ''logger.warn("some debug information")''. The backtrace
follows:
SecurityError (Insecure: can''t modify array)
2006 Mar 16
4
Handling/Catching Exceptions
Hello!
I was wondering, sometimes I raise an exception in my Rails apps, e.g.:
raise SecurityError unless @post.user == logged_in_user
Now: is there any way to catch that SecurityError exception somewhere
and render a custom template? E.g., I want to render
''app/views/content/security_error.rhtml''
Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks a bunch,
Rob
2011 Jun 29
6
RSpec with Rails 3.1rc4: spec test won't recognize <%= %> (should be simple)
In my user_sessions_controller:
class UserSessionsController < ApplicationController
before_filter :require_no_user, :only => [:create, :new]
before_filter :require_user, :only => :destroy
def new
@user_session = UserSession.new
@message = "Hello."
end
def create
@user_session = UserSession.new(params[:user_session])
if @user_session.save
1999 Apr 20
0
Pb: browsing list
Hello,
I wanted to view a AIX box as a WinNT box, so I downloaded the file
samba-1.9.17p3.aix-3.2.5.tar.gz to install samba on the unix machine
(IBM RS6000). It runs AIX Version 3. My client machine runs WinNT
4.00.1381 (x86 Family 6 Model 1 Stepping6).
Samba is now installed on /usr2/local/samba. There are some symbolic
links on /usr/local/samba that point to the corresponding files in
2004 Feb 05
1
Lockdown ready for testing
Hi group
As promised some months ago, I'm letting you know that lockdown is now ready for testing. Please don't study the code to much, I know it is a mess and therefore a rewrite is on it's way. But feel free to take a look at the features offered, how you use them and the default settings.
When lockdown is ready for production usage, I'll release version 1.0. I guess that will
2008 Jun 24
0
Lockdown 0.5.10
What: Lockdown <http://stonean.com/projects/show/lockdown> is an
authorization/authentication gem for RubyOnRails 2.x
This version bundles Classy
Inheritance<http://stonean.com/projects/show/classy-inheritance>to
simplify the management screens. There is also a lot of template
cleanup
in this release.
*There were no changes to the security engine.*
If you have questions, please
2010 May 25
2
Rails 2.3.6 and Authlogic 2.1.4 or 2.1.3
In the test environment, logging out and back in is not working for me. The
log for the first login looks like this:
Processing UserSessionsController#create (for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-05-24 19:53:57) [POST]
Parameters: {"user_session"=>{"remember_me"=>"true", "password"=>"[FILTERED]", "login"=>"test"},
2017 May 02
1
OT: Firefox lockdown policies for CentOS7 desktops
Hi all,
I am doing some tests with my CentOS7 desktop. I have configured a policy to lockdown Chrome/Chromium browsers and it works perfectly. And I am trying to the same for Firefox browsers but Firefox's docs are really "hard" to understand.
I have the following stopper points:
a/ what is the "real" system wide's config file: firefox.js, sysprefs.js or
2003 Dec 01
0
desktop lockdown on win2k / xp
Hi guys,
I'm just about to shoot on my foot so I wanted to check if there is
something else to blow my full leg actually ;-))
I have setup a working Samba 3 PDC controller with user authentication and
roaming profiles. I want to lock down [*] the desktop on client machines
(win xp) as I did with poledit (NTConfig.POL) on Win9x/WinNT4 machines.
[*] Lock downs suck as : disabling msn
2009 Feb 25
0
Lockdown: Understanding "nil_lockdown_values"...?
Hi All,
I''m having a bit of trouble wrapping my head around
"nil_lockdown_values" in the Lockdown plugin. I''m unfamiliar with how
exactly this works. I''m assuming it is a helper method of sorts, but
I see no definition. Does Rails simply have the ability to nil_
[somerandomliborclass]_values? Would someone mind unconfusing me?
Also, where would I find
2012 Apr 10
2
wine and security - lockdown suggestions
I only run one piece of software under wine but this app is still a great risk.
The intentions and opportunity of software developers not using open source should not be underestimated.
when i run
env WINEPREFIX="/ubuntu/PC1/.wine" wine C:\\windows\\system32\\taskmgr.exe
I am reminded again of all the security problems with windows.
I was thinking that it ought to be easier to
2007 Feb 13
0
Win2K Lockdown: The master browser has received a server announcment...
I'm seeing errors like this in my event viewer on win2k clients:
Source MRx Smb
"The master browser has received a server announcement that
computer CONAN that believes it is the master browser for the
domain ...
The master brower is stoppong or an election is being forced."
Event ID 8003
The other error that frequently occurs with this:
Source: Netlogon
"No Windows NT or
2024 Jul 03
2
Request for a Lockdown option
Manon,
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 05:00, Manon Goo <manon.goo at dg-i.net> wrote:
> My Idea would be to have a shared secret option that the client and server would have to proof to know when initiating the Handshake. The Server or client could terminate the connection immediately when the peer does not know the secret. So in case of a security Problem the administrator could set an
2024 Jul 03
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Dear Christian,
>How is this different to configuring /etc/securetty and tunnelling
>Telnet over SSH Port Forwarding which I don't recommend BTW?
In case your SSH is remotely attackable for instance
- because your LDAP is configured wrongly,
- your run into some problem like CVE-2008-0166
- some users private keys are lost
And you want to lock down the sshd and investigate and
2024 Jul 14
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20240714024434.vvSRh10_ at steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
...
|[.]do not
|know about the AI_V4MAPPED flag[.]
I have read
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01
but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to
"simply do it", and get back a mapped address.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,
2024 Jul 14
1
Request for a Lockdown option
On 14/07/2024 03:49, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> I have read
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01
>
> but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to
> "simply do it", and get back a mapped address.
You are looking at a Internet draft which expired more than 20 years ago.
2024 Jul 04
1
Request for a Lockdown option
On 04.07.24 01:41, Manon Goo wrote:
> - some users private keys are lost
Then you go and remove the corresponding pubkeys from wherever they're
configured.
Seriously, even if you do not scan which pubkey is configured where
*now* (as is part of our usual monitoring), it'll be your "number <3"
task *then* to go hunt it down.
> And you want to lock down the sshd