similar to: advanced routing for 2 internet lines

Hello Julien, Am Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:15:47 +0100 schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > ** Test 1 ** > On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3' > When pinging 192.168.1.1 from client 1, with no success, I see no packet > passing. Sorry - the tcpdump command should end with "192.168.1.1" instead of

For reasons unknown, any connections to localhost -- tcp, icmp, or udp -- are all originating from my external interface, rl0: $ telnet localhost 25 Trying ::1... Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Can't assign requested address telnet: Unable to connect to remote host IPFW log: Jul 16 12:46:43 octo ipfw: 100 Accept TCP 192.168.1.119:1434 127.0.0.1:25 out via rl0

Hi List, I am new at this and trying to set up shorewall. I was using mnf-en to do it but it was using an old version of shorewall (shorewall-2.0.8-2mdk) and didn''t have the features I wanted. So I''ve installed shorewall-2.4.0-1mdk. Other bits of interest: iproute2-2.6.10-1mdk iptables-1.2.9-8mdk I''m trying to get the providers feature working. show capabilities:

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Le mar. 15 janv. 2019 à 03:13, Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> a écrit : > Hello Julien, > > > Am Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:15:47 +0100 > schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > > > > ** Test 1 ** > > On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3' > > When pinging 192.168.1.1 from client 1, with no success, I

Hi Julien, Am Mon, 14 Jan 2019 18:04:40 +0100 schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > Investigating with tcpdump withoug guidelines is beyond my skills I'm > afraid. Try this on your VPN_office host: tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3 In parallel you start a ping from the other network: ping 192.168.1.1 I assume, that tcpdump will show all packets from

Hi Lars, Thanks for the help ** Test 1 ** On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3' When pinging 192.168.1.1 from client 1, with no success, I see no packet passing. When pinging 192.168.1.3 from client 1, with success, I see packet passing: IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.3: ICMP echo request, id 2648, seq 23, length 64 IP 192.168.1.3 > 172.16.0.3: ICMP echo

Hi, I have a testing multihome setup, with the default gateway being one of the links and using policy routing to honor requests for a specific link. Everything works as expected when I request a specific IP to bind to. But if I request a specific interface things fall apart in ways that I can not explain: default gw (WORKS) ---------- rabbit@Thesaurus:~$ ping -c 1 yahoo.com PING yahoo.com

Hi, I have a cisco sdsl modem to connect to internet via eth1 (192.168.1.2) local is eth0 (192.168.2.254) default gw is 192.168.1.1 the cisco forwards all incoming ports to 192.168.1.2. I connect from outside on port 24562, login is successfull, the ftpserver gives back the external Ip of the cisco as pasv IP to the client (its a setting in the ftpserver). It gives an ip from the pasv range I

Hello all, I''m having some trouble getting backgroundrb set up so that all the processing happens on a single machine. I have 3 load balanced machines. Right now, all three run our web application and create MiddleMan workers to generate a large PDF report. However, because of the processing power needed to generate the PDFs, I want to change our setup so that two servers run

Hi all, I have a group of public IPs 80.x.x.209-80.x.x.215. My satellite broadband router has .209 and my Fedora Core 2 running Shorewall firewall has one network card with IP .210 and the other with 172.16.0.1/255.255.0.0. All network PCs have a 172.16.x.x private address. I am new to shorewall and fedora/linux. I would like requests to public IP 80.x.x.211 to be redirected to internal IP

I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only with their VPN IPs. I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. # DC1 configuration IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 --- /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local domain domain.local nameserver 172.19.1.173 --- I configured dnsmasq

Hi, At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel. My tinc.conf: ------------ Name=server AddressFamily=ipv4 Device=/dev/net/tun PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png Mode=switch KeyExpire=299

First of all, I''d like to thank Andy Furniss for his direction and for helping me get a working example up and running. For the following set up to work, you will need a linux computer at the ISP (server), a linux computer at the client location (client), and some a public range of IP''s you plan to send down to your client. (as this configuration involves patching the linux

This is my simple situation: I want to policy download and shape upload going through my router. It has two interfaces: eth0 (10.4.10.222/24 connected to LAN) and eth1 (172.16.0.1/24 connected to my laptop). My setup: [eth1] tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 999 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1Mbit tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match

I have a server whit 2 interfaces of network, where eth0 is the interfaces connetc to internet and eth1 to the internal network. This server hace a Squid only, but i setting the iptables for protection to the server. Iptables run from script and in this script i setting the redirection for the other server in my internal network to port 80 and 443. I follow the diferent how to and many manual, but

I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Dear Mailing list, I have a Dovecot v2.2.9 server that authenticate against a Openldap server. I want to configure Dovecot to use TLS for LDAP authentication. I have tried to fetch/send emails using Thunderbird: - IMAP succeed to fetch mail - SMTP failed to send mail The Dovecot server produce the following log : Jun 29 08:44:00 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[634]: connect from