similar to: Using a method from another class

I upgraded a working app from rails 2.1 to 2.3.2. Now when I run rake test:units I get this error: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/test_case.rb:17: superclass mismatch for class TestCase (TypeError) I generated a new test app and all tests run OK. For the upgrade I ran rake:update and renamed the class in test_helper to ActiveSupport::TestCase. Also renamed

Hi all, I''ve been Googling this one for a while now, and haven''t found a satisfactory answer. It has been posted here before by someone else, but it seems to have got forgotten, so here goes - perhaps someone can think up a way around the problem? In ApplicationController, I have the following method: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base <snip>

A bunch of controllers were not extending ActionController::TestCase, and instead were just using the basic test/unit testcase, so we were not getting some of the rails baked-in stuff. Signed-off-by: Jason Guiditta <jguiditt at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 2 +- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb | 2 +-

'tc_410_close_event.rb' was not being run. You could prove this by simply inserting "exit 1" into that test. The reason is unclear, but by renaming every class and method in the tests to be unique, this ensures the tests are run. --- ruby/t/tc_010_load.rb | 4 ++-- ruby/t/tc_020_create.rb | 4 ++-- ruby/t/tc_030_create_flags.rb | 4 ++--

We''ve been having problems writing functional tests for helper methods that rely on ActionView methods. Here''s a specific example. In application_helper.rb I''ve got a method called ''party_link()¨: def party_link(party) link_to party.full_name, { :controller => ''contacts'', :action =>

Code sample: class SomeController < ApplicationController before_filter do |c| add_crumb "Blah", "/blah" #breadcrumbs plugin redirect_to :controller => "foo", :action => "bar" unless c.send (:has_package?) end # Rest of the controller... private def has_package? # A bunch of logic work to check to make sure # somebody''s session contains

Hey, I''m wondering about the distinction between writing test methods like 1. def test_something_to_test end and like 2. test "something to test" do end It seems like there''s no difference. I did notice, however, that #2 can''t be done in a class that extends Test::Unit::TestCase, while it can be done in one that extends ActionController::TestCase. I also

Hi Folks, Troll trumps your existing ActiveResource mocking libraries like inbuilt HttpMock,Fakeweb or Webmock out of water. With Troll, ActiveResource mocking just works, some of its features: 1. Don''t need to mock calls at Net::HTTP level (which webmock,fakeweb do). Really, we don''t care what HTTP library ActiveResource uses, fakeweb and webmock bring additional complexity

After *much* digging and playing around, I finally figured out how to unit test instance variables that are created by actions. It was more difficult than I expected. It seems like there should have been a more straight forward way to do this. Can someone enlighten me? A simplified and somewhat contrived example of what I am current doing: Thanks. Matt >> # My Controller of interest

def test_valid assert_valid State.first end Error: test_valid(StateTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `assert_valid'' for #<StateTest: 0x7f0d60750318> I see that test_valid is now in ActionController::Assertions::ModelAssertions. Does this mean that test_valid is designed to be used i ActionController tests only? I can change my assert_valid(State.first) into assert

I have the following in my functional test file. class UserControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase fixtures :users def setup @controller = UserController.new @request = ActionController::TestRequest.new @response = ActionController::TestResponse.new @invalid_user = user(:invalid_user) @valid_user = users(:valid_user) end def test_login_success

Hi guys, Need some help. I am using Rails 2.0 and while writing functional test, I encountered the following problem class UserControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase fixtures :users ... def do_something attempt_login(users(:valid_user)) # assuming valid_user is a proper line in ... end def attempt_login(user) post :login, :user => { :login => user.login, :password

2006/6/28, Paul Barry <mail@paulbarry.com>: > Where can I find info about the "CRUD/resource-based features" that will be > in 1.2.0? In blogs. Especially about Railsconf and DHH''s keynotes. In trunk : http://dev.rubyonrails.org/browser/trunk/activeresource In DHH slides : Transcription of some slides from DHH''s talk at RubyKaigi 2006 (I suppose it must

I have two methods in application controller that I want to test from ForumController: ----------------------- class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base ... def logout session[:username] = nil session[:admin] = nil redirect_to(request.request_uri) end ... def home redirect_to(:controller => ''forum'', :action =>

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 41 -------------------- .../functional/managed_node_configuration_test.rb | 14 ++++--- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb | 8 ---- src/test/functional/permission_controller_test.rb | 15 ++++--- src/test/functional/quota_controller_test.rb | 2 +-

Hi guys, I''m running mocha (0.3.2) against Rails core and just found an issue where the mock doesn''t go away after the test is run. For example: def test_reset_bang_doesn_reinstall_named_routes ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.expects(:install).never @session.reset! end def test_zzz puts ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.inspect

Hi all. I''m getting the following error in my app: undefined method `redirect_to'' for ActionController::Base:Class I''m using Windows 2000, Rails 2.0.2 and resource_controller (from James Golick). My controller: class CommentsController < ApplicationController include ResourceController::Controller belongs_to :post, :article, :photo create do

--- .../functional/cloud/instance_controller_test.rb | 2 +- src/test/unit/vm_service_test.rb | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/test/functional/cloud/instance_controller_test.rb b/src/test/functional/cloud/instance_controller_test.rb index 71d132b..0d713d4 100644 --- a/src/test/functional/cloud/instance_controller_test.rb +++

Hi, I''m a bit puzzled with "get" in controller specs. When I write, it "should render index template" do get :index response.should render_template(:index) end Which "get" method is being used? I checked RDoc of RSpec and RSpec on Rails, but didn''t find "get". In Rails RDoc, I found the following "get"s. get

I''ve just created a pull request to finally make ActiveResource correctly handle validation errors returned from ActionController::Responder''s default JSON handling code. The code also handles the format produced by pre-3.2 Responders *and* the format previously expected by ActiveResource, so it shouldn''t break in any application that was working before.