Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Re: mongrel, static files, and haproxy healtchecks"
2015 Oct 13
1
Dovecot - Postfix with HAproxy
Hi Everyone,
I wouldlike to set up a postfix-dovecot with HA using HAproxy but im
facing issues.
I've followed this documentation :
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HAProxy (pour dovecot)
http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/06/30/efficient-smtp-relay-infrastructure-with-postfix-and-load-balancers/
(pour postfix)
Package's version :
dovecot : 2:2.2.19 (>= 2.2.19 pour proxy protocol)
2016 Mar 12
2
SELinux denies haproxy
Hi all,
I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be
working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in
syslog:
Mar 12 22:11:31 db1 kernel: [6058125.959624] type=1400
audit(1457820691.824:3029129): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=801
comm="haproxy" dest=7778 scontext=system_u:system_r:haproxy_t:s0
2016 Mar 12
1
SELinux denies haproxy
for more information :
https://www.mankier.com/8/haproxy_selinux
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org>
wrote:
> Am 12.03.2016 um 23:18 schrieb Tim Dunphy:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be
>> working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in
2016 Mar 12
0
SELinux denies haproxy
Am 12.03.2016 um 23:18 schrieb Tim Dunphy:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be
> working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in
> syslog:
>
>
> Mar 12 22:11:31 db1 kernel: [6058125.959624] type=1400
> audit(1457820691.824:3029129): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=801
>
2017 Oct 26
1
haproxy ssl support
When is 2.3 scheduled to be released?
Kevin
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> There is support for haproxy SSL TLVs in 2.3. See
>
> https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f43567aa%5E...b6fbc235.patch
>
> Aki
>
>> On October 26, 2017 at 12:25 PM Rok Poto?nik <r at rula.net> wrote:
>>
2017 Oct 26
0
haproxy ssl support
Hi!
There is support for haproxy SSL TLVs in 2.3. See
https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f43567aa%5E...b6fbc235.patch
Aki
> On October 26, 2017 at 12:25 PM Rok Poto?nik <r at rula.net> wrote:
>
>
> Even though it seems dovecot (using 2.2.33.1) supports haproxy's
> send-proxy-v2, it seems to lack send-proxy-v2-ssl (which also sends
> client's ssl state).
2008 Nov 04
1
HAproxy not listening to all IP address
guys,
i am trying to install HAproxy infront of my webserver.
usually my webserver listens on port 80 and since we have 5 ip address
serving 5 different sites on the same physical server the webserver
listens to all these ips and proxy the traffic to the relavent app
servers.
now the problem is if want to loadbalance i should install HAproxy on
port 80 and there lies the problem.
2019 Oct 16
1
[Bug 14160] New: rsynd in daemon mode should support haproxy proxy protocol
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14160
Bug ID: 14160
Summary: rsynd in daemon mode should support haproxy proxy
protocol
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee:
2017 Oct 26
2
haproxy ssl support
Even though it seems dovecot (using 2.2.33.1) supports haproxy's
send-proxy-v2, it seems to lack send-proxy-v2-ssl (which also sends
client's ssl state). It would be a nice feature for the backend server
to identify clients so one wouldn't have to use disable_plaintext_auth
on a production environment.
--- haproxy.cfg
frontend pop3
bind [::]:110 v4v6
bind
2016 Jun 24
1
haproxy + Apache + virtual hosts -> wrong host is displayed
Hello,
I hope my question is not off-topic here.
On CentOS 7.2.1511 I have installed:
haproxy-1.5.14-3.el7.x86_64
httpd-2.4.6-40.el7.centos.1.x86_64
The /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg binds HAProxy to
ports 80 and 443 and accepts HTTPS to slova.de:
defaults
mode http
option http-server-close
option forwardfor except 127.0.0.0/8
option
2015 Mar 27
5
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
Hello,
is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix sasl and dovecot auth like this:
clients -> 25:postfix -> 20025:haproxy -> 20025:auth-backend-1, 20025:auth-backend-2
The configuration I have now gives me this error randomly:
535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: Connection lost to authentication server
This is probably because haproxy change servers while
2013 May 29
0
CESA-2013:0868 Moderate CentOS 6 haproxy Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0868 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0868.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f34166210421d7e7a5f4754b19563ff5f09027ba369a9cd60bd51114231ae89c haproxy-1.4.22-4.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2013 Jul 30
0
CESA-2013:1120 Moderate CentOS 6 haproxy Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1120 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1120.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b89b3098b127d18c78ed0965bdccac4c9099d47ad43d313b5aa79c64ffe6a116 haproxy-1.4.22-5.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2015 Sep 08
0
CESA-2015:1741 Important CentOS 6 haproxy Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1741 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1741.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d4fc2abb0dfd295ca7c60bf84a21d21307764c65861003dd3802499585a42d93 haproxy-1.5.4-2.el6_7.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2016 Mar 22
0
CEBA-2016:0469 CentOS 6 haproxy BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:0469
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0469.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c45e323d582b1e22dd553c8efb97f6dd5265cda4f6e6c8f41c8736e9cf2bdc5f haproxy-1.5.4-2.el6_7.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2015 Oct 15
1
Haproxy and Dovecot auth
Hi all,
I'd like to use Haproxy to balance an auth service on a couple of
Dovecot directors to have a redundant sasl service for my Postfix instances.
While I configure the Postfixes to use, as smtpd_sasl_path, a direct
connection to one of the directors I notice no errors.
When I redirect the smtpd_sasl_path through an Haproxy balanced
connection, I receive an error the first time I try to
2013 Feb 01
3
Cannot get puppetlabs-haproxy to do what I want
I''ve been having a mess of a time using this module, which stinks because
its behavior is EXACTLY what I am looking for... whenever I bootstrap new
rabbitMQ nodes I want to add them to our HAProxy instance.
Here''s my relevant site.pp entries:
node /^rabbit.*/ inherits basenode {
@@haproxy::balancermember { $fqdn:
listening_service => ''messaging00'',
2011 Oct 18
3
haproxy ssl
hello list,
I am attempting to load balance SSL web servers using haproxy on centos 5.7.
I am using HA-Proxy version 1.4.18
Here is the stanza in the config regarding SSL:
listen https 192.168.1.200:443
mode tcp
balance roundrobin
option forwardfor except 192.168.1.200
option redispatch
maxconn 10000
reqadd X-Forwarded-Proto:\ https
2019 Apr 19
1
haproxy + submission services -> postfix failure
Hi,
I have a nginx server which is using the proxy protocol to forward tcp
connections to dovecot. Dovecot is configured to be a submission
service for email to be sent. Then postfix should send the email
itself which is also using the ha proxy protocol. There are a few
moving parts in this problem so I'm not sure where the problem is. But
I want to ask if somebody can validate my dovecot
2015 Mar 27
1
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
Gedalya skrev den 2015-03-27 14:48:
>> is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix
>> sasl and dovecot auth like this:
>> clients -> 25:postfix -> 20025:haproxy -> 20025:auth-backend-1,
>> 20025:auth-backend-2
> Why don't you set up a dovecot locally (with only auth service) on
> each postfix box?
cyrus-sasl is still needed, and