similar to: full nested models errors listing

Hi, Is there already a plugin for RadRails that would support RSpec ? Thx Julien -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070411/1c9aca29/attachment.html

Hi, I have been trying to use the new nested models & forms feature in rails 2.3 #helper def add_job_profile_link(name, form, vacancy) link_to_function name do |page| profile = render(:partial => ''job_profile'', :locals => { :f => form, :job_profile => vacancy.job_profiles.build }) page << %{

Julien Lerouge wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote: > >> I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 >> and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of >> LLVM 2.3. >> I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 >> and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they

Dear list, I'm quite confused when interpreting results from a mixed linear model. For example, working on Iris data frame, I want to know the effect of species on slope of the model "Petal.Length~Sepal.Length" I write this : data(iris) reg01 <- lm(Petal.Length~Sepal.Length + Sepal.Length:Species, data=iris) summary(reg01) It gives me a summary table with lm for the first

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote: > I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 > and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of > LLVM 2.3. > I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 > and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location: > >

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1 Severity: important Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9697-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 20060725-0410 > ****************************************************************************** ... > CFLAGS="-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -m32 -march=i686 -Wall

Hi, I would like to know if anyone has been able to implement correctly 2.3 nested forms and create dynamically (javascript) a bunch of nested elements with their correct DOM ids. I''ve seen Complex forms Railcasts but they use pre-2.3 nested forms. I''ve seen Alloy solution but it is not working properly to me. When creating more than two lines dynamically the id is repeated.

Hello everyone! Philippe, you told me to make a bugreport. Well, here it comes, I'm still not sure, if tis is a bug or a miss-configuration. So I've put up a collection of configurations/output/debug files from a simple asterisk session testing the gtalk call. You can download it here: http://juliencoder.de/ap.txt Or I can mail it, just tell me where and I'll attach it to

Hi Julien, Due to some new commits, openjdk build is broken for the moment. We are fixing this. You can temporarily use the following commit to try VMKit with OpenJDK implementation. d9bf3794d66a116999f8f16d0799fba6fe5bd822 just call the following command in your vmkit directory: git checkout d9bf3794d66a116999f8f16d0799fba6fe5bd822 Harris Bakiras On 03/18/2013 10:12 AM, Julien Pagès

Hi, I''m using nested models to create form in my view. It looks like this: <% form_for :user, :url => {:action => "add_owner" }, :html => { :method => :post } do |u| %> <li><label>Name: </label><%= u.text_field :name %></li> <li><label>Surname: </label><%= u.text_field :surname %></li> <%

Hi, I see that now vmkit2 contains the last revisions of the project, so I follow these instructions to compile vmkit : http://vmkit2.gforge.inria.fr/start.php I download and compile LLVM without errors. I have tested with and without optimizations but this is the same for the errors. My configuration for LLVM is just : ./configure; make Apparently we can build vmkit with OpenJDK instead of GNU

Hi list, In Rails logs, at the end of each request, the log states something like Completed in 37ms (View: 1, DB: 8) Is there a simple way to access the "DB: 8" info in the view ? Thanks Julien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re-adding the list, below message was sent to me alone: On 11 August 2011 13:45, Rinaldini Julien <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch> wrote: > Thx for all answers... > > I'll try that. But in a long term what I want to do will be a bit more complicated... It was just an example. In this case, the goal is to replace all add with sub that return the same result, like: > > var

Something is adding a bogus comment string. Specifically " # %case^M18 ", where "^M" is a single ctrl-M character. The ^M is seen by the asm parser as an end-of-line, so the '18' is a new token at the start of a line, not part of the comment. Is your pass perhaps using label names which might include literal "^M" characters? -Jim On Jun 13, 2012, at

Rinaldini, What exactly did you run? Specifically, you may be missing some analysis passes that are necessary for LoopInfo to have the loop information you desire. -Hal On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:02:04 +0000 Rinaldini Julien <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to detect if a basicblock is part of a loop or not. > > I tried the llvm::LoopInfo

> De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] > Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 11:37 > À : Rinaldini Julien > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] RE : svn trunk comilation error > > Hi Rinaldini, > > You probably need to illustrate what your enviroment is, what revision you > checkout and how you build LLVM. I have no problem build LLVM svn here.

Hi! I have updated my app to rails 2.3. I have form that has few nested models and I am happy that I can just write accepts_nested_attributes_for :tasks, :allow_destroy => true, but update_attributes! does not update my nested model. I have tried update_attributes, and it works. Any ideas? Few lines from log: update_attributes: SQL (0.1ms) BEGIN Education Update (0.3ms) UPDATE

Martin, You got some fine response already from other r-users. Indeed, centering explanatory variables is quite common and it really can have benefits in numerical accuracy. However one might also use centering for response variable and even standardization i.e. x - mean(x) / sd(x). This might increase the robustness of multivariate analysis, where variables have very different scales. For

Hi, Is there a simpler way to implement the view-component of nested forms as it was done in Railscast #75 (Complex Forms Part 3) in Rails 2.3? I''d like to add and remove the owned objects dynamically using AJAX requests, but using f.fields_for :object do |object_form| doen''t let me load new objects into the form - or at least I don''t fully understand how that should

Hi, Depending on what have run before your pass, the loop may have been unrolled or simplified if the computation inside the loop is too simple. Cheers, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Cristianno Martins [cristiannomartins at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 5:52 PM To: