similar to: again: HTB - I can''t stand it any longer HELP ME

Hi folks, I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ. The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work fine...!!! But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case. Somebody can tell me the errors? Thx, in advance.- NOTICE: IMQ device is to asociate with ETH1 my external iface. SCRIPT que funciona:

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh

I''m admin of 50 clients. Sometimes I upgrading my internet traffic shaping script. I think rules of inetrnet traffic shaping is very important thing! I would like to ask some help from people, who understand something about SQUID ZPH and TC, to aim beter internet traffic shaping scripts. Squid has ZPH suport, becouse its responds to such commands as: zph_tos_local 8 zph_tos_peer 0

Hi Devik/Patrik, In setting up IMQ/HTB with a GRE Tunnel I''m constantly getting kernel errors: [root@linux /root]# dmesg ... ... ... NET: XXX messages suppressed. Dead loop on virtual device gre1, fix it urgently! ... ... ... This I get only if I''m going to start cross device b/w control. If I remove iptables rule iptables -t mangle -D POSTROUTING -j IMQ then no such warning

Hello. I have a strange problem with HTB. The configuration is: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 r2q 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 78kbit ceil 78kbit burst 3K cburst 3K tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 30kbit ceil 78kbit prio 0 burst 3K cburst 3K tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 16kbit ceil 78kbit prio 1 tc

Hello, I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while it should be the whole bandwidth). My script: /sbin/modprobe imq numdevs=1 /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 ingress 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /sbin/ifconfig imq0 down

Hello, I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the imq usage example on the linuximq.net site: It was something like this: tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5 tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit

Hi All, I''m trying to create a contended section of bandwidth using IMQ. I have the imq0 device up and running, with traffic passing through it. Firstly, I need to throttle the entire device imq0 to 2mbit/s. I would then like to add throttle rules for individual IP addresses, allowing them to pass up to 512kbit/s each, as long as imq0 has not reached its 2mbit/s. The configuration

I want to shape the incoming traffic ( download ) "but using only fwmark", i know there are other methods, but i want to use this one particularly... So, first i create DOWNLOAD and mark with 20 all the traffic with destination 10.0.0.3 ( eth1 ) incoming from my internet device ( eth0 ). #$IPTABLES -t mangle -N DOWNLOAD #$IPTABLES -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i eth0 -j DOWNLOAD

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

Hi, I''m running mldonkey on same box as shorewall. I follow this http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/ShorewallConfiguration to open ports for edonkey protocol I add in /etc/shorewall/rules: # eDonkey 2000 ACCEPT net $FW tcp 4662 ACCEPT net $FW udp 4666 but I could not connect to any edonkey server. I check logs and notice that udp traffic on port 4666 is still dropped. Jul 8 22:35:57

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hi, I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb script. I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very* slow (mails with

Hello, I''m using these rules (attached) to control traffic going out from ip 192.168.0.100 which is acting as a p2p server, but when I have these rules on and mldonkey running I experience some latency in web pages, which Iwould like to eliminate. I''ve read that this is where the burst and cburst (even quantum) parameters are useful, but I still can''t understand

Hello, I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn''t able to solve myself. I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet. Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want to divide with tc. When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give it the appropriate unique mark: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -d 192.168.34.141 -j MARK

Hi I''m moving to hfcs (mostly succesfuly:) ), but I''ve encountered a strange problem: When I download something from this server using wget (one thread) via an idle uplink, I get no more than 130 kbit/s, and when I''m using prozilla (or start more wgets), I get about 200 kbit, but still it''s not all the link can do (240) - the rest remamins unused. Is this

Hello, a few days ago I sent an email asking for help with my tc htb rules I''ve got (a script), but I''m not sure if that email got to you... anyway, I''m sending it again along with my htb script and I''ll tell you the problem once again: I have a computer with ip 192.168.0.100 which is acting as a p2p server, so I want to shape traffic coming out from that

Hi gang, I''ve got a problem with shorewall, it keeps dropping packets when it should be DNATing them. I want all connections on a tcp port 4662 to be forwarded to a machine on my network (192.168.0.5) - the port is used for mldonkey (P2P app). It seems to be partially working - loads of packets are being DNAT''ed but some are not - I cant figure out why! The firewall