similar to: Best way of moving some jQuery from a view helper

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Best way of moving some jQuery from a view helper"

2011 Dec 29
1
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < > anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > >> > I believe the best option for us is to add the >> > --fno-omit-frame-pointer depending on the -faddress-sanitizer flag. >> > But in order to do this reliably, we need
2012 Mar 24
1
Append to file in loop
My files are on disk and they are regular text files named file_1 file_2 file_3 file_4 and file_5 with extension .saam The separator is sep='' (ie, white space) I want to append 'XFile' at the end of those files. XFile is also on disk. file.append("file_1.saam", "XFile.saam"); file.append("file_2.saam", "XFile.saam")... works but it
2012 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > >> And one more question regarding ASan cmake build. >> Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is >> not: >> > > As a side note: I
2012 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > And one more question regarding ASan cmake build. > Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is > not: > As a side note: I don't like that the current cmake machinery builds asan tests by explicitly passing libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a. IMO it needs to use
2007 May 15
1
link_to_remote with :confirm...need syntax help
What is the syntax to use :confirm with link_to_remote? This doesn''t work, I''ve tried a few permutations, with no success: <%= link_to_remote( "X", :update => ''address_list'', :url => { :controller => ''addresses'', :action => ''destroy'', :id => address },
2007 Oct 10
1
form builder
hi, I''m creating a custom form_builder and i''m trying to figure out how would helpers like text_field know if the field has an error message so I can highlight it and show the message text thanks linoj --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To
2011 Dec 28
2
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
> I believe the best option for us is to add the > --fno-omit-frame-pointer depending on the -faddress-sanitizer flag. > But in order to do this reliably, we need to remove all the instances > of -fomit-frame-pointer from the command line. Why? Just add -fno-omit-frame-pointer last. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
2012 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
And one more question regarding ASan cmake build. Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is not: current cmake build stores libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a together with all the LLVM libs (in $build_path/lib/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a), but the Clang driver looks for asan runtime in clang resource dir:
2011 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info > wrote: > > I believe the best option for us is to add the > > --fno-omit-frame-pointer depending on the -faddress-sanitizer flag. > > But in order to do this reliably, we need to remove all the instances > > of -fomit-frame-pointer from the command line. > Why? Just add
2011 May 04
0
using jquery datepicker within a jquery dialog
so I have datepicker working just fine in a normal window but I cannot for the life of me get it to work within a dialog. I have some javascript that opens a dialog in my application.js file as well as the datepicker js is as follows: $(function() { $("#version_release_date").datepicker({dateFormat: ''yy-mm-dd''}); }); $(document).ready(function() {
2011 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:10:54PM -0800, Kostya Serebryany wrote: >> > What would be the best fix for asan? >> >> Can you be explicit what you need to asan?
2011 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Any updates on this? > > In particular, I'd like to see concrete patches proposed for review and > inclusion into LLVM. I think having actual patches on the table and under > review will help a great deal. Kostya, let me know if I can help prepare > them. > Ok, I'll send the
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya
2012 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM,
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's
2006 Apr 07
2
Re: Re: page.replace_html "#{var_containing_id_name}", :partial
> you mean like this? > > def do_some_ajax_thing > <at> element_id = "content_div" > end > > do_some_ajax_thing.rjs > > page.replace_html <at> element_id, :partial => "edit" > > remember, the view templates have access to the attributes defined > in the controller Actually, its more like this: I have a list page. Each row
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in > CMake. This is ... quite challenging. > > I think I can get it to work with one significant caveat: it will require > manual dependency management. None of the automatic header tracking. I > think this is fine
2012 Jun 25
4
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in CMake. This is ... quite challenging. I think I can get it to work with one significant caveat: it will require manual dependency management. None of the automatic header tracking. I think this is fine in some cases, and not so fine in other cases. Let me explain. It feels like these tests are really comprised of two
2011 Nov 17
3
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer run-time in tools/clang/runtime/compiler-rt
Hi Daniel, Chris suggested to talk to you about committing the AddressSanitizer (asan) run-time into the llvm tree (llvm-project/compiler-rt). Questions: - What is the preferred name for the directory? (asan? libasan? address_sanitizer? AdressSanitizer?) - Should the asan run-time use cmake, or just make, or what? The build is a bit tricky, especially for tests. We currently use make. - How
2012 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > >> Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in >> CMake. This is ... quite challenging. >> >> I think I can get it to work with one significant