similar to: synatx error while running migration

Dear all! I wrote my R-code with an editor and loaded it with source("my_file.R"). Everything works fine as expected. When I try to start my code with: R --no-save < my_file.R I do get a synatx error half way through. The version is 1.9.0 on a Linux system. To start it with R --no-save < my_file.R works on some machines but on some it doesn't. Are there any rules

Hello people, I was going thru Geshi http://qbnz.com/highlighter/ , I am wondering if any one has a Ruby syntax highlighting library so that I can use it in one of my projects. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hello everyone! I am using markdown on my blog (Markdown Extra actually, thank you Michel!). I use code snippets heavily and I really appreciate that I shouldn't escape '<' and '>' manually. However I always wanted to use syntax highlighting for code snippets and it's a bit hard with markdown because most highlighters require some indication of a code language

Having a ModulePass that requires a FunctionPass that in turn requires another ModulePass results in an assertion being fired. Is this expected behavior (that seems to be undocumented), or a bug? Specifically, the following code will emit the assertion: [VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1597: virtual void llvm::ModulePass::assignPassManager(llvm::PMStack&, llvm::PassManagerType): Assertion

"A module pass can use function level passes (e.g. dominators) using getAnalysis interfacegetAnalysis<DominatorTree>(Function), if the function pass does not require any module passes." http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html In your case, A module pass (ModPass2) is trying tu use function level pass (FunPass1) which uses module level pass (ModPass1). This is not

Hi, A potential client (hotel) has a Property Management System that talks the "Mitel" protocol to their current Mitel PBX in order to receive CDRs (which end up being rated by the PMS system and charged back to guests). Does anyone know of any (free or otherwise) docs on this protocol, or better still have experience interfacing asterisk in a hotel situation like this? The PMS

Is there a reason for why `-asan` and `-asan-module` can be mixed but Function passes and Module passes with the new PM can't be mixed? - Leo On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:21 AM Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com> wrote: > > On 09/27/2018 12:25 PM, Philip Pfaffe wrote: >> >> `opt < %s -passed='asan' -asan-module -S` > > asan-module is another

How can I vmjc to run CallGraphSCCPasses? I wrote a test pass that does nothing, and all vmjc says is: vmjc: PassManager.cpp:1604: virtual void llvm::ModulePass::assignPassManager(llvm::PMStack&, llvm::PassManagerType): Assertion `!PMS.empty() && "Unable to find appropriate Pass Manager"' failed. 0 vmjc 0x08a6bfd8 Aborted Running even a built in pass like prune-eh

Our company can offer VoIP to premises and domestic users and bill the premises as a whole. We need something to enable the hotel owner to bill each guest in a hotel in real time. What solutions do exist presently? (PS: Our radius (and every telephony equipment outside the hotel) does not recognise which room in the hotel initiated the international (VoIP) call, so that's the main problem

Under MacOS I had R64 executive and it was clear. Under Ubuntu, which I do not have administrative rights to, there is only R executive. It seems that I can allocate more than 3GB of memory, however not everything seems to work the same/right as with R64 under MacOS. Pms.

Hi all, I am struggling to compile a massive R code that I have written through some years, aiming to provide automated investment strategies to my Portfolio Managers. You may ask me why do I not rewrite the code in C or C++; the answer is it is really massive and that will take me lots of time. The pb is I will be moving from one team to another therefore I want to make it an exec program that

> > `opt < %s -passed='asan' -asan-module -S` > asan-module is another ModulePass, not a commandline option. You can't mix that like this. Cheers, Philip > doesn't produce the same IR as > > `opt < %s -asan -asan-module -S` > > More specifically, the only thing missing seems to be the > `asan.module_ctor` that should get added to the global

I''m trying to figure out if there is a common/working setup that people are using to host puppet in remote sites. At first our setup was that we have several puppetmasters (PM) in site A and a couple in our smaller site B. In site A we are also hosting Foreman and our mysql DB for storeconfigs. site A and B are connected via a WAN that is fairly slow. With this setup the issue I

Hi, Does the current LLVM backend support reading in profile information (without preserving across transformations)? An earlier poster http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/4bd65dbe84394bb7 noted that accessing execution counts in a MachineFunction pass (using the BasicBlock* corresponding to the respective MachineBasicBlock) returned 0 for all blocks. Running llc with

Greetinigs, I am extending llc to include runtime checks for calls (in X86). So a call 'call target' is altered to look like this: [some check] jne error_function call target I've done this by implementing a MachineFunctionPass that is instantiated and added to the PassManager in X86TargetMachine::addPreRegAlloc. In order to create the jne-instruction I need some BasicBlock

Howdy, Has anyone worked on a Mitel-2000 emulation for PMS integration (Hotel mgmt systems)?  Hoping to get my hands on the protocol definition (RS-232!!) for check-in/check-out/housekeeping/CDR, but if someone has already done I would totally buy it. Cheers, -- Jeff LaCoursiere StratusTalk, Inc.

Hi all, At some time in the near future we would like to allow for Rust to use the new PM. As I understand it, Rust uses LLVM through the stable LLVM C API, which currently only provides an interface to the legacy PM. We wanted to ask what people think about how we should go about exposing the new PM through this API. We can think of 3 possibilities for now: 1) Just replace the API to expose the

We have Red Hat linux 3.0 ES. We had samba set up so that it would authenticate against the linux password file/database. That is the set up we have had here for the past two years, firstly with RH linux ES 2.1 and now with RH linux ES 3.0. Our users have Windows XP/2000 PC's, and when they would use the net use command on their PC (or mount network drives via Windows Explorer) it would

Hi, if I dial meetme from extension 200 directly it works ok - I get moh as only user (first trace). If I dial to other local extension and trasfer from there I get second trace... Apparent difference between those two is warning : Jan 27 11:06:33 WARNING[6133]: res_musiconhold.c:466 moh_alloc: No class: random What this could mean ? Direct Call log-----------------------------------------:

When migrating my project to 2.9, I've encountered a strange segfault where if a ModulePass's getAnalysisUsage adds LoopInfo and DominatorTree, then llvm::PMTopLevelManager::findAnalysisUsage will segfault. What's odd is that if I rearrange this (add required for DominatorTree before LoopInfo), it does not segfault. I realize that LoopInfo requires and preserves DominatorTree, but this