similar to: Scan IP Range In Ruby on Rails

In authlogic, I set the password field to "crypted password" Is there a way to display a password, even if its "crypted"? What if the user forgets the password and needs to recover it? How can I recover a crypted password? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send

what i have done is as follows password = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:#{password}") pass1 = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:asdfgh") pass2 = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:asdfgh") pass3 = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:qwerty") puts pass1==pass2 puts pass1==pass3 This works fine but i need to get the decrypted password how can i get it any help is

Hi folks, I've got a Dell R320 running CentOS 7, and a 10G NIC. I'm running a DNS server on it, for testing. As part of my testing, I'm attempting to capture all the DNS queries arriving on the server, using tcpdump. However, tcpdump's performance is abysmal, and it loses lots of the packets. Here's the output when I stop the capture: # tcpdump -nn -i p1p1 -w

Has anyone seen any attempts to give Markdown a PEG (parsing expressions grammar) recognizable by some ruby PEG parser generator grammar like Treetop? http://treetop.rubyforge.org/

Hi, Have been pulling out my hair for the last few days wondering what I''m going to deploy my site onto. I currently have FreeBSD 4.7, Apache 1.3.3, PHP 4 and MySQL 4 running a year-old PHP site. Dated stuff I know! The new version of the site will be entirely Ruby on Rails, and I am wondering what order I should be doing things in terms of upgrades and installation. I want to be

Exhausted mirrors and had the following errors. (2/10): nmap-frontend-4.0 100% |=========================| 29 kB 00:00 http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/i386/dag/RPMS/nmap- frontend-4.01-1.2.el4.rf.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. (3/10): libpng-devel-1.2. 100% |=========================| 169 kB 00:00 (4/10): nmap-4.01-1.2.el4 100%

Hello! Attempt to scan a network with any method except plain ping results in an error: truss nmap -sT -p 21 '172.19.17.*' [...] sendto(0x4,0x8094200,0,0x0,{ AF_INET 172.19.17.0:0 },0x10) ERR#49 'Can't assign requested address' [...] What's strange that man on send(2) doesn't state that EADDRNOTAVAIL can ever be returned from sendto(). Quick look at nmap's site

Wondering if anyone''s heard of a php script that will ''forward'' your requests on to, say, a mongrel instance, and return it? Kind of a php fcgi? Thoughts? Thanks. -Roger -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hi, I need to test one specific port on a serie of Ip addresses that I own, I thought about using nmap or telnet, but both return the same value, no matter if the port is open or filtered. Anyone has an idea, before I start scripting to analyse the output of the command? Regards, Ugo

On 10/30/2015 09:01 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On device >>> somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP MicroServer. >>> There are so many possible electronic culprits today. > >> You should be able to use nmap to scan the device. > > Thanks

On 11/01/2015 07:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > ken wrote: > >> On 10/30/2015 09:01 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>>> So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On >>>>> device somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP >>>>> MicroServer. There are so many possible electronic culprits today. >>>>

I have set up a secondary IP address in the same network as my primary. So eth0: 192.168.100.29 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0:0 192.168.100.45 netmask 255.255.255.0 And indeed when I invoke an apache instance that listens on the secondary IP address/interface it works, and it also makes it outside the LAN since the default gateway is defined in the routing tables for 192.168.100.0/24. But

This is really an apache question but if anyone knows offhand it would be nice to know... How do i build a standalone mod_proxy.so module that i can use to load into an apache install that has loadable module support compiled in? thanks

Dear fellow Markdown enthusiasts, As you all might know, Markdown is a highly context sensitive language that the (often regex-based) syntax highlighting mechanisms in existing editors struggle to keep up with. I have taken John MacFarlane's excellent peg-markdown compiler and modified its parser to function as an interpreter for syntax highlighting purposes. The end result is a

Guys, After i got the port forwarding and everything else working as per my previous post, i ran a shields-up scan from grc.com on the firewall, i.e. a scan of the external interface. I m a little suprised at the results. On the firewall i have postfix running ( smtp port 26 ), openssh ( ssh port 22) and port forwarding of port 85 (on the firewall ) to an internal host. The Shields-Up scan

Hi, Is it possible to block the port scanning through shorewall, if yes then how? Thanks and Best Regards, Arif

I see that the RubyOnRails.com site has migrated to Mongrel with Apache as a front-end proxy. Is that now the/a recommended setup for Rails apps? We''re still using FCGI but I''m always interested to learn more about other folk''s successful deployment choices. Across all of our sites we''re pumping out about 300k pages per day so anything that saves memory or has

Hello list, I wonder if someone could help me understand the following: I''ve got a managed dedicated server with GoDaddy. Until now, I''ve only hosted PHP applications there. I now need to set it up to host my new beloved Rails application. I asked them to set up apache with mod_proxy_balancer for the mongrel cluster, however, here''s what they told me: *Unfortunately,

I know NTLMv1 isn't secure and NTLMv2 is better. But I need to test a client's NTMLv1 compatibility when the server does not support NTLMv2 and to do that I need samba (current version 3.0.33 via CentOS 4) to not try to negotiate NTMLv2. All the searches I've done tell me how to enable NTLMv2, but specifying: [global] encrypt passwords = yes ntlm auth = yes

For some users, request.remote_ip always return nil. According to the RAILS''s help: REMOTE_ADDR is the standard but will fail if the user is behind a proxy. HTTP_CLIENT_IP and/or HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR are set by proxies so check for these before falling back to REMOTE_ADDR. HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR may be a comma- delimited list in the case of multiple chained proxies; the first is the