similar to: qos setting up

Hi I have the following problem: I''ve created qos script which shapes traffic on outgoing interface eth1. More - less it looks like this : ------------------------CUT------------------------------------------------------ #root qdisc and class for eth1 $tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 htb default 19 $tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htp ratel ${CEIL_UP}kbit ceil

hi everybody. im trying to set up an QoS config, using layer7 (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) for protocol detection. im suposing 3 clients with this configuration: 3 clients: 1.2.3.1 , 1.2.3.2 , 1.2.3.3 1.2.3.1 has 256kbit bandwidth "guaranteed" clients 1.2.3.2 and 1.2.3.3 has 256kbit bandwith so im marking every packet using layer7 iptables module, classifying them in three

I have 4 VLANs which i would like to give different priority on our internet connection. I would also like to shape traffic, according to its FWmark, in EACH VLAN. I have created this setup, with a HTB classes in a HTB class in a HTB class. (3 levels). ROOT IMQ1 QDISC 1:0 | HTB 1:1 (HTB AT LINE UPPER LIMIT) |

Hi list, I''m trying to do qos based on HTB, in my linux box wich is my firewall and transparent proxy, and I don''t have the possibility to put other machine to make proxy. Well, If I up my htb scripts, the proxy will be limited to serve my LAN as a external site and limited to the limit of 768kbits, even making two classes, tryn to limit it traffic to the maximun bandwidth

Hello i''m having some issues trying to match packets using iptables mark, iproute filter and tc filter.- i mean, when i do iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 20 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 -o eth1 --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 $TC qdisc del dev $INET_IFACE root $TC

Hi. I did send this to `jaazz@post.cz'', but I suspect the list is a more appropriate/useful place for it. It''s a question about Michal Charvat''s QoS extension to Net-SNMP. When I look at the MIB entries for the QoS handles, I get something like this - enterprises.qos.qosObjectTable.qosObject.qosHandle.0.0 = Gauge32: 0

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:35 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Jody: I don''t know if you answer basic HTB questions but I''l try anyway. I''m implementing AF and EF with a

Hi, My home setup is as following: - 1024/128 kbit ADSL - FC3 I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the obtained results. The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I think... ;). The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and make an FTP download.

Hello First thanks for the answers I have received from the list!! I have now a working qos configuration which bases of the lartc howto capitel 15.10. One Problem I have is that I have limited the upload stream to 100kps because my upstream is only 128kbps. Everything works fine EXCEPT Voip. I have a VoiP phone which is connected on the same net as the adsl modem BUT does not use upstream it

(list admin, please cancel the same post from my other email address -- forgot to change it on first submission) I need to setup QoS on a linux router/firewall I maintain. I spent 10 hours reading everything I could find on QoS/HTB/iproute2 and came up with what I thought made sense for my situation. So I deployed it and BOOM! KERNEL PANIC! Not what I was expecting... now the debugging begins.

Hi Paolo Malfatti, Thanks for your script. It works fine. I get what I expect. THANK you all the way until it comes to an end. FOR the benifit for evryone in the LIST. HERE IS the SCRIPT AGAIN. INTERFAZ_LAN=eth0 FULLBANDWIDTH=256 BANDWIDTH4LAN=64 tc qdisc del root dev $INTERFAZ_LAN tc qdisc add dev $INTERFAZ_LAN root handle 1 htb r2q 4 tc class add dev $INTERFAZ_LAN parent 1: classid 1:2

Hi Guys After googling a little I couldn''t find the correct answer.. When I use : tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.11 flowid 1:30 , I can shape traffic to 1:30.( works like a charm) Now instead tc filter I would like to use CLASSIFY as below: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -d 192.168.0.5 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:30 but when I

hello folks, this is my first post to that list. so I hope I am not completely OT here :-) reading the (excellent!) lartc and then writing my own qos-script I have still some open questions which I will try to formulate now: - "Now we can optionally attach queuing disciplines to the leaf classes. If none is specified the default is pfifo." - I can''t find info about Pfifo.

I try to shape traffic using HTB and mark packets within iptables using PREROUTING. But the filterrules seems to ignore the marks set with PREROUTING Only POSTROUTING marks are accepted. First my configuration I have a router connected to the internet via ADSL over interface ppp0. eth0 is a tunnel to ppp0 and eth1 serves the LAN. LAN is 192.168.57.0/24 on 10Mbit ppp0 is 80.126.16.44 on

hi i am running Debian/GNU Linux with 2.4.26 kernel and radius server my kernel conf looks like this <*> Packet socket [ ] Packet socket: mmapped IO < > Netlink device emulation [*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains) [*] Network packet filtering debugging [ ] Socket Filtering <*> Unix domain sockets [*] TCP/IP networking [*] IP: multicasting [*] IP: advanced

Dear All, I’m working with Fedora Core 3, kernel 2.9.1, MPLS-for-Linux-4.193, and having some problems when create a HTB queue. ALL packets goes to the default queue, they don’t care about any mark or ip field I use to enqueue them. : -/ That’s the deal, all packets that incoming the interface eth2 are classified and have theirs TOS field changed following some qos policy at the PREROUTING

I am using the script below to simulate a very high bandwidth connection.I find that I could not turn the bandwidth knob up to 100Mbit.I have had a look at this generally,but could not find an answer.any help would much appreciated as i have spent a lot of time on this and have not found any answers anywhere. In my test,I have four network cards and their rate are all 1000Mbps. my scripts:

Hi, I am new to HTB and in the learning process I want to simulate a slower link on my server to see how qdisc works. I have a 100Mbit connection. I want to simulate a 100K connection and to divide traffic between FTP and SMB. (like in HTB user guide). The problem is that it doesn’t work. I can transfer files with FTP of SAMBA at the wire speed. (Just like when there was no HTB and qdisc).

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure

We have been using HTB for last 10-11 months without any problem. But from last few days we have been facing huge packet loss when we turn on traffic shaping using HTB. I upgraded to 2.4.24 kernel (without any htb patch), still there is same problem. Avg. traffic is around 2Mbps and 4Mbps at peak hours. There are around 110 HTB classes and SFQ attached to each class. We are using 4 port Tulip