similar to: STI or MTI design ?

Dear List, Given that I am developing a rails 2.3.5 site, When it comes to storing threaded comments in a blog or forum, Then which plugin/gem should be considered "State of the Art"? I''m starting with these URLs: http://github.com/rails/acts_as_tree http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set

Hello, I''m using the Awesome Nested Set plugin: https://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set And in my model I do the following: acts_as_nested_set after_save :ensure_max_nestedset_level private def ensure_max_nestedset_level if self.level > 2 self.move_to_child_of(parent.parent) end end I do this to keep the levels from getting

I got the following error when trying to create the elibrary instance (rdb:21) @elibrary = Elibrary.new(params[:elibrary]) RuntimeError Exception: Declare either attr_protected or attr_accessible for Elibrary, but not both. params : "elibrary"=>{"title"=>"bingo three", "short_description"=>"something new",

I''m creating a hierarchical tag structure for my portfolio. I have a few top level tags. those could then have children, those children could then have children. Pretty standard so far. Often a child tag will be under more than one parent (i.e. a child might belong toone or more parents) and it wouldn''t necessarily have the same children under one parent as it would in another.

I tried require ''url_writer'' but this is not the trick what should be required/included to test the routes urls ? thanks erwin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this

I am creating forum application which needs usage of acts_as_list or acts_as_tree or acts_as_nested_set. I am unable to decide among these. please could some one recommend from their experience? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have a dump of some tables to be filled when the app is setup ''.../db/dataset/regions_dpt_cities_codes.sql'' I would like to execute a task similar to the >mysql source <dump_file> like : ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("source #{path};") (which doesn''t run fine, of course.... is it possible in a rake task ? if yes, any suggestion ?

I have a constant set up like that : ALL_LOCALES => {"it"=>"Italian", "fr"=>"Français", "de"=>"Deutsch", "en- GB"=>"English (UK)", "es"=>"Español (España)", "pt-PT"=>"Português", "pl"=>"Polski", "en-US"=>"English

I started using robotcoop''s CachedModel class in my project but have encountered problems when using it with the acts_as_ferret plugin. It seems it doesn''t index everything in my STI model, also if I do a search from my base STI class I get a result count but no results. If I run the same search from one of the children STI models I get the appropriate results (if the information

I am getting this error on the redirect_to command ... I am using Rails 3 w Paperclip to upload files ( but I tried also CarrierWave .. same error) I tried to change the session store from cookie-based to database .. same error I tried to delete the params content ... I don''t know what to try next .. any clue ? thanks erwin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

I am trying to deploy a Rails app ( Rails 3.0.9 / Ruby 1.9.2 ) in production (Debian 6) it''s running fine in development mode on localhost ( OSX) I am getting this error from Passenger : undefined symbol: ruby_current_thread /var/www/vhosts/mydomain.com/rails/testsbga/shared/bundle/ruby/ 1.9.1/gems/ruby-debug-base19-0.11.25/lib/ruby_debug.so: undefined symbol: ruby_current_thread -

The form is inside a table, enclosing a <tr> = form_tag admins_backoffice_dashboards_path, :remote =>"true" do %tr.search %th= link_to t(:clear), "#", :id => :clearFilter %th= select_tag :role, options_from_collection_for_select(Role.global, :id, :name, :selected => @role_id ) %th= text_field_tag :email, nil, :value

Hi all, In a legacy ''immutable'' schema I have MTI inheritance setting: <<TABLE systems>> id<<PK>> ( NOT database generated) installation_date manufacturer serial_number <<TABLE lifters>> id<<PK>><<FK>> ( NOT database generated ) max_weight drive In my model I have implemented the semantic of inheritance between

I have presently a render :json which modify the current page if @request.save format.html { redirect_to(@request) } format.json { render :json => { :result => ''success'', :request => request_path(@request) } } .... but I would like rather to redirect to an index page I wrote this but it doesn''t redirect ... format.json {

When I have this pattern sign_me(@user, :event => :authentication, :subdomain => subdomain) how can I write it to avoid sending the :subdomain option if subdomain.nil? ( if possible ..) sign_me(@user, :event => :authentication #?, :subdomain => subdomain unless subdomain.nil? ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[rails 3.2.2] I perform an ajax call : ... $.ajax url: " /backoffice/expenses/rate" type: "GET" dataType: "json" data: project_id: $(''#project_id'').val() code: $(this).val() success: (result) -> alert result $(''#expense_price'').val(result) in

Hello, I have a tree structure that needs to be converted into a nested set. A great deal of work has already been done on the tree items, so maintaining the integrity of the id''s is mandatory. However I need the ability to access entire branches of the tree, which is what Nested set does. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to efficiently transfer the tree to the nested set and

Testing locally I uploaded files into public/system/... folders ( default for Paperclip) Upon deployment ( capistrano) on the remote server, I can see a symlink from public/system to the shared/system/ but the content ( all images ) is not transferred.... I had to do it myself via ftp .. Is it a standard behavior ? or did I miss adding a task in the deployment ? thanks for your feedback --

I apologize for the terribly long message, but here goes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First, regarding existing tools that I now about. libavcodec and users (e.g. HandBrake): - if there are 6 channels or less, the layout is set by the decoder as per the FLAC specification - if there are more than 6 channels, the layout is

given an Arra tags[] I need to produce a resulting Hash as following .. { "$in" => [tags[0]], "$in" =>[tags[1], ...} in which the key should be always the same and the value being an Array I tried this : myHash = {} tags.each do |tag| h = {"$in" => [tag]} myHash.merge!(h) end but the merge! is only