similar to: Shaping known application traffic

LS, Spent a lot of this weekend reading about shaping and traffic control. The Howto is very extensive... :-) I hope to use this list to see if what I want is possible. The situation: - A central (big) Citrix cluster located in Frankfurt (all servers in one subnet) - The office in Rotterdam connected to Franfurt with a 2Mbit line - The office in Bergen (Norway) connected to *Rotterdam* with a

Will the following rules work to mark and shape OUTBOUND ftp speed (passive ftp ports 50000-60000) on my linux server? I want to be able to run these commands on the actual computer that is running the ftp server. iptables -t mangle -N MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:60000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc

Dear list, I have experimented some time now with HTB queues, and have received a lot of help from this list, especially from Stef. Thank you. My currect Shaper looks like this: http://www.designobjekt.de/test/rc.trafficshaper Unfortunately I still experience lags of this type: -players from the internet playing on my server feel lags -I feel lags when I play on a different server on the

Hi Guys, Here is a question that is probably of concern to many of us. I am under pressure to provide some solution for ingress traffic shaping. What my customer demands is to divide the downstream (ingress) of an ADSL lines to two classes of traffic - important traffic and non important downloads. He has a very reasonable requirement: he wants a guarantee of at least 1000kbps at all times for

Hi, I''ve a router configuration with a dsl connection and two ethernet NICs. How can I control the traffic of the dsl connection when then destination of the traffic can go out of the router using two diferent interfaces? ppp -- router --- lan | DMZ I''ve read that the solution could be IMQ, but i prefer to not to patch kernel and iptables. Any

Hi ! I´ve been using the wonderful wondershaper from chapter 15.8 of the LARTC Howto for some time. It´s really wonderful. Actually, I use the version from http://freshmeat.net/projects/wshaper/?topic_id=87 Now I tried to put some hosts to low priority, and it doesn´t work. The traffic is splitted equally between the noprio and the other hosts. Is this because I use ip masquerading, and all

Hi guys, I''m new to TC HTB traffic shaping.... I installed it at my first try on my Bearing Leaf Router/Firewall I use the tc -s class show dev eth? To see my output All looks dandy and nice, but it''s figures, of which at current momment looks like French to me, I would like to see exactly what these figures looks like in a GRAPH style... I know I can use MRTG, I do have

Hi! I have configured traffic shaping with htb and imq but when i am downloading the latency for example on the Bnet class is very high ..... example: 65 kb/s download best latency: 56ms lateny on bnet class while downloading: 400 350 250 350 400 100 300 200 80 200 300 250 ..... To get informations about latency i am marking ping packets with iptables. I want to play during other users

Dear. folks I want to shaping FTP traffic. I can get following information from Stef Coene's Homepage, www.docom.org. "Ftp uses random ports, so matching the data traffic is not easy. However it can done if you use iptables to mark ftp-data packets and use that mark with the fw filter. For more info see http://home.regit.org/connmark.html. " General information about the conntrack

I have been reading lartc.org for the past few days and am a bit overwhelemed by the possibilities and configurations that are possible. I am still trying to process all of this to try and understand what I need to do in my configuration, and have tried a few things to no avail. I currently have a webserver that is completely flooding our link, so I need to find a way to deal with this quickly.

Hi Stef, Reffering to page < http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/7.html > I found a para as follows, " CBQ is not always as accurate as it should be. See docum.org on the test page for some tests with bounded classes. The algorithm used by cbq is very "link sensitive". It calculates the link idle time and for that it needs the real link bandwidth, average

Hi! I answer to two messages from this thread (I use digest). lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: ibro tj <ibb_linux@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] QoS for Voip. > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br > > Hi, > > the hint from Martin A Brown which I am

This is a long message. Please use a monospace font :) I''m trying to shape the traffic between my LAN and the Internet. My link is an ADSL 512/128 line. The network is shaped like this: LAN GATEWAY ROUTER ------------------ ------------- ------------ | 192.168.0.1/16 | <----> | 192.168.0.1 | <----> | 10.0.0.138

Hi, I live in a rural community where adsl and cable is not widely available. I correctly have an option of using adsl or cable at my location. Ten miles away my friends apartment building has no option of cable or adsl. I set-up a wireless link between my friends apartment building and my house. It works great for him and me and the adsl company doesn''t care because they

> From: "Roy" <roy@xxx.lt> > > I want to set interface to promisc mode and do all routing with iptables. > Is it somehow possible? as I see now kernel do not pass everything to > ipables. > > Basicaly I want to ignore ethernet addess and use only ip for routing. > > I suppose this may require writting special kernel driver or it > is possible > in

Hi, In our product i am using the High Speed Serial driver as the WAN interface. I''ve implemented the HSS as a serial driver and i am running PPP to connect to the internet. I have both Voice data + FTP data going thro the PPP session. Is it possible for me to use the Traffic shaper(wonder shaper) in my case/ Do i need to make the HSS driver to appear as a network device inorder to

For those of you in the US using Comcast as your ISP, you''ll know that they now have a feature called Powerboost available in the regions they serve. Basically, it allows people to have higher-than-rated throughput for the first few minutes of data transfer. After those few minutes, they''re supposed to throttle back down to what their rated line speed is. I''m having

I''m rate limiting and prioritizing traffic upstream of a slow wan link using htb, classic wonder shaper type stuff. I''m using the following command for traffic that does not match any of my defined filters: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 It appears that local, non-routable traffic like arps and igmp are being snared by this and end-up queued in the lowest

how can I configure for shaping bandwith using cbq/htb without delay or latency?

the question is simple. can i shape ppp interfaces using htb? thanx regards lucas -- ___ /\ \ __ __ _______ _____ _____ \ \ \ /\ \ /\ \ / _____\ / ____ \ /\ ___\ \ \ \_____\ \ \\_| \\ \____/_ /\ __ \\ \ ____ \ \ \_______\\ \______ / \ ______\\ \__\_/\__\\//\_____\ \/_______/ \/_____ / \/______/ \/__/ \/__/ \/_____/