similar to: rpms for 32 bit

Hello List, I need to access some data a MS-SQL server ie run a stored procedure or user-defined function or a select every so often maybe 3 times a day. Have centos 4.5 on intel xeon. Is there an obvious certain-to-succeed approach? perl DBI + ODBC spings to mind, have not tried it yet - cannot access the systems yet - need to make a good plan. Am a bit concerned cos I dont know of an

In my seeking a managable way to build libtiff, on the Asterfax forum I got the following recommendation (from another fax user that made the move to libtiff 3.8.2): ================================================================ Hi Robert, I have compiled libtiff-3.8.2 from the source package for my Fedora Core 4 machine. I am not sure about CentOS, but I think you can try to do the same

Am 24.11.2014 um 13:35 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > On 11/23/2014 10:23 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: >> >> Hello Centos, >> >> Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386 >> 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on >> the system? >> >> yum install perl >>

During last update packets pidgin and libpurple were updated while "yum update"-ing Is it a common and normal thing that both x86_64 and i386 arch rpms are installed during update? This not the first time. -- Cheers, Alexx mailto:alexx187 at gmail.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Centos, Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on the system? yum install perl Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: repo.bigstepcloud.com * epel: mirror.bytemark.co.uk * extras:

All, I am now building rpms on, and using a multi-lib arch (x86_64) for the first time ... when using the standard command: rpm -qa | grep pkg_name The results might be pkg_name.i386 or pkg_name.x86_64 ... or both. But, the way it is shown by the default query format, looks the same ... like this: pkg_name pkg_name ---------------------------- example: [root at x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep

I updated my i386 systems without any problems, but when I tried to update one of my x86_64 systems, I got an error from yum. Transaction Check Error: file /usr/include/libdevmapper.h from install of device-mapper-1.02.02-3.0.RHEL4 conflicts with file from package device-mapper-1.01.04-1.0.RHEL4 So it can't install the newer package because it conflicts with the older package???

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is

Hello, I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for multiple architectures are installed: yum install sqlite-devel Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * updates: centos.intergenia.de * addons: centos.intergenia.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de base 100%

RPMS's rebuilt or upstream one's used Hi I got a cleanly reinstalled 4.2 workstation. However i still needed to build the following SRPMS from Mandriva/Fedora :- - Chkrootkit - Logcheck - Tripwire - Xboard & Gnuchess - Rkhunter I needed to use the upstream versions of :- - OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 - RealPlayer Gold - Acrobat Reader I needed to tweak Bind chroot to log queries and

Hello LLVM, I'd like to check TSFlags in my AsmBackend code. However AsmBackend objects don't have a reference to MCInstrInfo, which is the only way I've seen to reach TSFlags. A quickie grep shows that none of the existing targets check TSFlags in their AsmBackends. Is there any reason I shouldn't check TSFlags in AsmBackend? If not, what's the best way to go about it?

I am attempting to build from a src.rpm (knowing very little about rpm at all) and the spec file notes that the architecture should be set on the command line: > # platform defines - set one below or define the build_xxx on the command line Now. My question is this, how does one do this using rpmbuild? The syntax rpmbuild --target centos4 package.src.rpm seemingly has no effect.

I think we can get rid of the TSFlagsFields and TSFlagsShifts hack in the InstrInfo TableGen class now. This seems to work just fine: class Instruction { bits<32> TSFlags; } class Domain<bits<2> val> { bits<2> Value = val; } def GenericDomain : Domain<0>; def SSEPackedInt : Domain<1>; def SSEPackedSingle : Domain<2>; def SSEPackedDouble :

Hello, I'm trying to write assembler code writer, and of course, have new questions. I'd like the structure my implementation like this: if (/*binary instruction*/) { // print destination O << " = "; // print first operand O << opcode; // print second operand. } if (/* unary instruction */ ) { .... } if (/*control instruction*/) { ....

Hello all, I wan to ask, what is exactly the purpose of TSFlags and can it be used for the condition handling in instructions? How can I implement the conditions in the instruction when I don't have access to the Status Register? Best regards, ES -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> hi, >>>> >>>> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >>>> >>>> Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key

Hi All: On architectures where multiple architectures for an RPM may be simultaneously installed (my example is x86_64), does anyone know the RPM magic to remove only one version? For instance, if I have the x86_64 and i386 versions of an RPM installed, how I can specify to only remove the i386 version? I have been unable to find a search phrase that turns up any useful information.

I'm trying to run "yum update" on "CentOS release 3.4 (final)": But I'm getting an error: <snip> Package mod_ssl needs httpd = 2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2, this is not available. </snip> However: </snip> [root at dev1 root]# rpm -qa | grep httpd httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 </snip> It's installed. So I

Hi all, has somebody already tried to compile the rpm of the newest samba package on a 64-bit CentOS. I tried to do it with the Fedora spec file and it quit with an error, that some files are not located in the lib64 directory. These required files are located in the lib directory. Any sugesstion how this problem could be fixed in a clean way? How is this problem solved during the CentOS

Hello, I am trying to emit binary for my implemented vector instructions. Although yet i havent done any change or addition in MC framework, For vector load instruction there are no error coming. But for vector add instruction is something like this; > %R_0_REG2048b_1<def> = P_256B_VADD %R_0_REG2048b_1<kill>, %R_0_REG2048b_0<kill> I am getting the following error: Unknown