similar to: Anything out there that is similar to Cisco''s WFQ?

Hi all As part of may project i wants to implement the WFQ in linux, at present upto my knowledge there is no such implementation in linux. The only mannual i got from "Csaba Toth", He explained the tc command so i hope that is in linux also. DID any one know about it, Please infome me about it also, Thanks for all regards ********* *Sunil* *********

I would like to implement WFQ queuing discipline in Linux as a part of our deploma project. How to assign weight to each flow using ''tc'' commands.Then which will be the main queue. Thanks and Regards sheba

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was searching for few days in this mailing list but I didn''t find how to solve my tc problem. Feel free to ask me more details if you think there are relevant. I''m using a Gentoo 2.4.32-gentoo-r2 and I''m trying to test a *weighted fair queuing* (WFQ) implementation. See http://home.sch.bme.hu/~tusi/wfq/ I patched

Hello, Normally, in addition to such qdisc scheduler mechanisms as FIFO, PQ, WRR, WFQ, are there any more? Then, there is a confusion on scheduler in Linux enviroment: Assume there is a qdisc, such as RED as a leaf qdisc in a router, we know, if there is packet which want to enqueue the packet, the Function red_enqueue is called, but when the packet leave the queue(when the Function red_dequeue

I would like to implement an architecture to support LLQ and WFQ with Qos linux elements ! Is possible use CBQ (you can set same parameters to control WRR process) or HTB (how can i controll DRR process) structure ? My idea is to classify packets by List flows, tos flows or connections flows (as CBWFQ on CISCO ) I saw also for WRR patch (http://www.zz9.dk/wrr), but I don''t understand

hai all i need to implement CBWFQ in linux As i wrote script in edge as: which mark the EF traffic ____________________________________________________________________-__ #!/bin/sh DEV=eth0 tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle 1: root dsmark indices 8 tc class change dev $DEV classid 1:1 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0xb8 # making two filters tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 4 protocol ip u32 tc

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Hi, I wanted to implemente WFQ, but it is not implemented on tc. Is there any way of making something like WFQ with which is implemented on tc?? What I exactly want to do, is to select flows by IP and port destination, and priorize them, but I don''t need (and don''t really want) to fix any rate... Has anyone got any clue??? Thank you Bye

Hi, I used HTB3.6 on Linux to control traffic.It seems that HTB uses DRR(Dificit Round-Robin) algorithm.I heard that it is difficult for DRR to get a delay bounded and WFQ is better than DRR.Is that right?So,how to implement WFQ in Linux? Thanks a lot! Best Regards swcims swcims@163.com 2004-08-03 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

How can we have WFQ implemented in Linux.....any pointers. Also do we need a patch in Kernel to implement these. Regards Arshad

I saw some unexpected behavior in the interaction of hosts allow and hosts deny on Samba 3.0.28. I built Samba 3.2.4 just to be sure it wasn't something that had been fixed. I saw the same behavior. I'm not sure if it is a bug or a failure on my part to understand the documentation or misleading documentation. If I have a share defined as [export] comment = exported

I have this problem: I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a min speed: Vmax and Vmin. The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the actual bandwidth (you don''t not how much, you only know the speed is between Vmax and Vmin) for N clients. The bandwidth should be shared so nobody can get more bandwidth than the others.

I''ve the same problem of Julien Bisconti. Can someone help me ? I try to compile iproute2 for my target ppc 8260. Thank you !

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Hello, I am new to R. I often collect data at multiple sites and need to create separate graphs (such as scatterplots or histograms) of specific variables for each site. I have tried to do this by splitting the data frame and then using lapply, but it seems that the graphing commands cannot be called as functions. Here is a sample of my data, called "seeddist2": site

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I