similar to: My sql error: Lock wait timeout

Hello all I am using acts_as_ferret in user model. Error Message: -------------- ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction: UPDATE `users` SET `updated_at` = ''2009-12-28 14:31:50'', `active_till` = ''2009-12-28 14:31:50'' WHERE `id` = 21 Where: ------ calls#audit

Hi all, Ive been getting this error on one particular query repeatedly for the past few days. ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction: UPDATE `posts` SET `updated_at` = ''2010-03-17 05:35:00'', `view_count` = 54 WHERE `id` = 158 Googling around, I found that this is basically because the transaction times out after

We''re seeing these errors intermittently: ### Mysql::Error: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction: UPDATE `chairs` SET `published_at` = NULL, `updated_at` = ''2008-07-30 15:31:05'' WHERE `id` = 2147 [RAILS_ROOT]/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/ connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:147:in `log'' ### The root issue is probably

Hi Daniel, I made some changes to the LNT perf reporting tool to make it more user friendly by adding some features: 1. Make the sidebar and the navigation bar stationary, so that it is easy to navigate the site 2. Have the pop-down menu for the items in the navigation bar, activate upon hovering the mouse, rather than clicking the item 3. Add a nav-link in the sidebar for the

Hi, Can you extract data from a SQL server table based on parameters already in R? For example I have a list of unique patient IDs with latest hospitalisation date which I've processed in R. I need to join this data to other tables in SQL server. The tables in SQL server are too large to import without reducing the number of records. I do not have write access to the SQL server.

Wow, that sounds great! Thanks for working on this, and yes, please, send the patches! --renato On 30 April 2013 16:23, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel,**** > > I made some changes to the LNT perf reporting tool to make it more user > friendly by adding some features:**** > > **1. **Make the sidebar and the navigation bar stationary,

Hello, This patch aims to improve compile time performance by increasing the SCEV vector size in LoopStrengthReduce. It is observed that the BaseRegs vector size is 4 in most cases, and elements are frequently copied when it is initialized as SmallVector<const SCEV *, 2> BaseRegs. Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by ~0.5%. Patch by Wan Xiaofei.

Hi, I am trying to get a small loop to *not vectorize* for cases where it doesn't make sense. For instance, this loop: void foo(int a[4][8], int n) { int b[4][8]; for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++) { for(int j = 0; j < n; j++) { a[i][j] = b[i][j]; } } } * Has maximum of 8ints copy. LLVM tries to use Memcpy for the inner loop. It is not helpful to perform

Hello there, I recently started working on the LLVM backend for a target that doesn't support x87 instructions. Currently, I am in the process of completely disabling some x87 instructions such as fcomi, fcompi,... for a specific sub-target. I also do not have SSE enabled for my sub-target, and llvm resorts to fcomi* instructions for FP compare instructions. Is there a way to bypass the

Hi Nadav, Thanks for the response. I forgot to mention that there is an upper limit of 16 for the Trip Count check, TinyTripCountVectorThreshold = 16; if (TC > 0u && TC < TinyTripCountVectorThreshold). So right now, any loop with Trip Count as 0, or with value >=16, LV with unroll. With the change to the lower bound, it will also include the loop with 0 trip count. SCEV returns 0

I have a user that gets client timeout errors when he tries to delete/clean up his massive "Spam" folder (many thousands of mail messages). He uses Thunderbird and has it configured to use "Move to Trash" when he deletes messages. I find the following in Dovecot's log file when it happens: Aug 28 10:38:22 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(bpn): Timeout

Hi Sriram, Thanks for performing this analysis. The problem here, both for memcpy and the vectorizer, is that we can’t predict the size of “n”, even though the only use of ’n’ is for the loop bound for the alloca [4 x [8 x i32]]. If you change the unroll condition to TC >= 0 then you will disable loop unrolling for all loops because getSmallConstantTripCount returns an unsigned number. You

How to make it work with paginator (kaminari)? MySQL and full text search: Words (id, word) @words = Word.find_by_sql(["SELECT id, word, MATCH (word) AGAINST (?) AS Score FROM words WHERE MATCH (word) AGAINST (?) ORDER BY Score Desc, word!=?", params[:search],params[:search],params[:search]]) I can''t add .page(params[:page]).per(5) to the end of "find_by_sql()" so

Hi folks, I've been googling around for awhile but I can't seem to find an answer to my question. I have a number of filesystems that contain thousands of hard links due to some bad organization of data. Rsync, cpio and various other utilities fail to copy this data because I think there might be some cycles in it. (you know you have troubles if cpio can't copy it!) What I thought

I am trying to mount the ocfs partitions using the following command Mount -t ocfs -o uid=oracle,gid=dba /dev/sda /ocfs01 as user oracle and group dba. However it mounts the volume as root. But if I use the ocfstool for the first and mount it as oracle:dba, the subsequent mounts using the above command line mounts the volume as oracle:dba. Is there something that I am missing or I will have

On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > so you could infer that n must be smaller than 8 (because you know the range of the other dimension). The question is how often does such an example occur, where this is possible, to make such an effort justifiable? smaller equal, of course ;)

Hi I am using Trixbox 2.4 and PRI lines..on the CDR i see many calls that have duration of 0 seconds, but they are still shown as ANSWERED . how come its possible when duration is 0.00 ? Are the callers billed for such calls ? Rgds Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

So I''m upgrading my app from Rails 1.2.6 to Rails 2.1.2. I have a complex find statement that worked in 1.2.6 and isn''t working in 2.1.2. I think maybe this is a bug, although maybe there''s something else I could be doing to work-around it? My find statement involves: * Models in a module for namespace purposes * a join clause with raw SQL * an includes clause with

I am using acts_as_taggable in my application and on the tagging side of things, no problem at all. Running edge Rails and PostgreSQL 8.1. I am then trying to find all my AR objects with a certain tag. The tag is: lasvegas and I know that there are at least 3 records with that tag. So, I''m doing this: @lists = List.find_tagged_with :any => @search_string, :separator =>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by > ~0.5%. That's fairly small; what was the standard deviation, confidence interval, etc? -- Sean Silva