similar to: Simple pfifo_fast question

Why am I getting giants on imq0? How do I stop that? ========== imq0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 UP RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:39880312 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:39878715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1024 RX

Thank you Andy! I did''t find why I could''t use the fw match in ingress. Now it works. Now I ran into another problem: When I try to add a pfifo_fast leaf qdisc dor htb classes it seg.-faults. Is pfifo_fast a special qdisc? I can succesfully add other type of qdiscs. I found that a similar problem was reported in february on a MIPS architecture. root@zefir:/usr/src# tc qdisc

Hello, I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while it should be the whole bandwidth). My script: /sbin/modprobe imq numdevs=1 /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 ingress 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /sbin/ifconfig imq0 down

Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class

Hello I am trying to attach pfifo_fast to af leaf htb class. But tc segmenetation faults. If I try the failing command throug strace, it shows me that the last thing tc tries to do just before the segmentation fault, is to try to open a file called "/usr/lib/tc/q_pfifo_fast.so". Of course i have tried to find worthfull information around the Internet, but haven''t found

Hi ! I want to share my bandwidth between 10 computers. I want to redirect computer A(192.168.1.4) to htb class 1:2 and the others to htb class 1:3. But the last tc filter doesn''t work : Error message : "Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:3" is unparsable. " I know the option "default" for htb but I don''t want to use it for some

Hi, I have a cable modem with a bandwidth capped upload rate. I''d like to prioritize packets going outbound according to the TOS header of the IP field. I''ve read through the LARTC Howto several times, and I think I have a good feel for the information it it. It also seems that what I''m trying to do is pretty straight-forward and common. Unfortunately, the HOWTO

mdew:~# tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 12 r2q 1 Cannot find device "imq0" mdew:~# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted ipt_REDIRECT 728 0 (autoclean) ipt_MARK 728 2 (autoclean) iptable_mangle 2100 1 (autoclean) ipt_REJECT 2712 4 (autoclean) iptable_filter 1672 1 (autoclean)

I am completely new to this.. I am trying to make simple traffic control.. I have read quite some manuals and posts that i found, but i don''t understand much, i think.. My situation is: i have linux server which i am using for firewall for local network.. also on same linux server i have torrentflux for downloading torrents.. What i want to do is to give priority to local clients(2-3

I would like to use HTB''s prio parameter as the sole priority value for pfifo_fast. Is the TOS field in packets honored by an HTB class with the default pfifo_fast qdisc enqueued when coming from a child class with a prio parameter?! If yes, what''s the least expensive way (in terms of CPU cycles) of stripping all packets from the TOS field?!

I''m working with LEAF boxes as gateway machines. I''m trying to implement Proxy-ARP to build a bandwidth manager for my network. I''ve gone as per the lartc howto to implement a transparent bridge in an existing network and plan to put in my tc script after this. I''m configuring the box as a standalone one before plugging it into the network. I''m getting

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Hi, I''m trying to make run a simple shaping *through HTB*. I have compiled a new kernel 2.4.21. First command from http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm said: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I tryed both standard tc from Debian stable and http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v2/tc.gz this one... I tryed

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hi, I have a default class for my un-marked traffic (prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff, but I do not understand why my download traffic is duplicated in both. It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting except the red class but I have the same result if I create an esfq instead). Any comments/information will be appreciated. Below my config : tc commands from my scirpt :

Hi! I have read all informations i could find, but some things are still not clear. My setup is: ---INTERNET1(eth0)-\ /- Local net1 (eth2) GW ---INTERNET2(eth1)-/ \- Local net2 (eth3) I have NAT and a working setup using HTB,SFQ, classifying with the iptables -j CLASSIFY way. I shape only the traffic coming from the internet heading to the intranet. I would like

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

I''m admin of 50 clients. Sometimes I upgrading my internet traffic shaping script. I think rules of inetrnet traffic shaping is very important thing! I would like to ask some help from people, who understand something about SQUID ZPH and TC, to aim beter internet traffic shaping scripts. Squid has ZPH suport, becouse its responds to such commands as: zph_tos_local 8 zph_tos_peer 0