similar to: compress data, ipsec & iproute !!

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

hi all.. i just noticed while patching ulog(patch-o-matic) with kernel-2.4.17--->patch not applied ! would be gratefull if someone can help on this ( Gurus ''am not a programmer pls.):-( arindam

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0570 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0570.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 31a7240ff770ddd2f18715bccd1907f290b22468f2fa7d654e912e242cdeafcb iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1814 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 11b560b8b12bef924870b17dd0580fe72624e17d692d7206870738a5999abbc6 iproute-2.6.32-33.el6_6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0417 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0417.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8c69bdfc16cc4ddccb73c38491522f13b2b560caec4bfca88112050d750180a1 iproute-2.6.32-23.el6.i686.rpm

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:15:39 +0100 "PIOTREK H." <komarekmz@tlen.pl> wrote: > Welcome > > I have a problem with the new iproute "iproute2-2.6.37.tar.bz2 07-Jan-2011 9:18 (the problem from version 2010 to 2011). > Three problems: > a) with filters for UDP traffic > problem affects only the queuing traffic to the machine on which you work qos > In the case

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1276 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 866debd9507a39fa83ccfc6bdba54ad872b56220db2eba7798145a080423611b iproute-3.10.0-54.el7_2.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0808 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0808 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: abf0bf331ab7c24a12bf898ac03213e8fc8b812bc63d938c28f6aa278c59573a iproute-4.11.0-14.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3985 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3985 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 15715636a7e96f4bc322dd352ee4acf3b67a2c903d3fe91b9384e7e57484f387 iproute-4.11.0-25.el7_7.2.x86_64.rpm

Good morning, I''m writing to ask for collaboration in finding an improvement to a particular process. Today: To get traffic for our IDS sensors and a billing system, we collect everything at our core switches (2) by connecting a SPAN port from each switch to a server (so, 2 interfaces collecting traffic). That server changes the destination MAC address on all traffic to that of

hi all, my system with kernel 2.4.16 & 2.4.17( RH-7.2) has netfilter-1.2.4, iproute-ss010803, squid, dns with 4 ether cards.i am trying a simple situation where i want to shape traffic all the interfaces. at present iam using netfilter to allow a few ips, using transparent squid & iproute to limit bandwidth. i feel i must give more bandwidth for my local servers for my office &

[FreeBSD 7-STABLE/i386] Hello, I've got a 100 % reproductible panic with ipsec when using a 'ping -s 4000'. It works without ipsec My ipsec setup is very simple, i just use setkey: /etc/ipsec.conf flush; spdflush; add 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.200 esp 1011 -E rijndael-cbc "0123456789012345"; add 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.21 esp 1012 -E rijndael-cbc

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1153 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1153.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e8c793f6d9912b63c3281b2bd94ef978bd30df485d17b56b6c7df44b5ccce649 iproute-2.6.18-15.el5.i386.rpm x86_64:

I'm getting a strange error while rebuilding iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.src.rpm ... rpmbuild --rebuild iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.src.rpm ... ./normal >normal.dist *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x08491050 *** /bin/sh: line 1: 5236 Aborted ./normal >normal.dist make[1]: *** [normal.dist] Error 134 ... + install -m 644 tc/normal.dist

Hi List, i have a realy strange problem with no solution yet, i''m using iproute together with the iptables mangle option, in a dmz network is a cisco pix present with another inet link behind, therefore i''m using the mangle option to split traffic on a protocol base like: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -s 192.168.1.5 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 3 and add the

hi all, i want to try htb3 with imq downloaded & patched imq & htb3 with kernel-2.4.18 on rh7.2 but got STUCK on step 1 :( this are what i did can anyone guide me what went wrong on the first step itself !! [root@cab1 root]# modprobe imq numdevs=1 modprobe: Can''t locate module imq [root@cab1 root]# [root@cab1 root]# tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 Cannot find

I am using policy based routing and I have 3 route tables setup, ADSLLink1, ADSLLink2, and ADSLLoadBalanced, "ip route show <table>" will show me the routes that I have added to the first two, but not from ADSLLoadBalanced, it will show the last route that was added to the table but no others. There are approx 16 routes added to the table, I know they are there because they work,

Hi, when iproute is installed then the default queue that it is giving to an interface is pfifo_fast. I would like to ask whether it is possible to disable this feature and rather have the kernel give by default to an interface the queue that it would give if iproute hadn''t been installed. I want to be able to customize the queue with tc only when it is necessary. Is this

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1453 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1453.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1696052dc92d5c6f692841653549a25f iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.i386.rpm Source: 5c35f60f79ab3702361d090877ccb4b8 iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1453 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1453.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 00d1e239e19b91e0919546db00dea4b8 iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 5c35f60f79ab3702361d090877ccb4b8 iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes