similar to: 2 networks - 2 routers maybe three

Dear all, I have a workgroup withonly windows 200 workstations in it and one Samba version 2.212 The network is bridged with a subnet mask 255.255.255.240 >From the WAN side you get: Internet > Modem/router > first NIC > firewall and out to LAN via second NIC Because the second NIC has no IP address the browsing is done by the first NIC avoiding that the information is not going

OK, either I have taken a stupid pill and am missing something basic or routed network do not work. I assume that, if they did work, it would be in more or less that same manner as a nat network as far as ping'ing, ssh'ing, etc. to another real host on the same real LAN as the virtualization host. At least that is what I believe I should expect. I have googled for info and everything

from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> Based on commit: 9314e330 Setting UseDefaultAddress to TRUE uses invalid StationAddress and SubnetMask values. This is in a network with a local TFTP/MTFTP server. If the server is local, on the same subnet, UseDefaultAddress is set to false and the client ip and subnetmask are loaded, otherwise set UseDefaultAddress to TRUE. This is added to

>>> Setting UseDefaultAddress to TRUE uses invalid StationAddress and SubnetMask values. This is in a network with a local TFTP/MTFTP server. If the server is local, on the same subnet, UseDefaultAddress is set to false and the client ip and subnetmask are loaded, otherwise set UseDefaultAddress to TRUE. This is added to core_udp_connect and core_udp_sendto. Signed-off-by: Jeff

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM, <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> wrote: > Gene, > > I am very sorry. I did try the patch you suggested and had the same issue. > Then, I grabbed the latest patch on Patrick's git repo. That's the commit > that I listed. It was posted two days ago. > > I just noticed this on Patrick's repo: This branch is 6 commits ahead, 2 >

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:02 PM, <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> wrote: > from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> > > Update UEFI PXE proxyDHCP handling. > > This patch is based on commit ID 8a00e49 > > Modify two files to specify valid ip addresses. These files are efi/pxe.c > and efi/udp.c. 1) In commit 2e266c35, I proposed using UseDefaultAddress. As I

from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> Update UEFI PXE proxyDHCP handling. This patch is based on commit ID 8a00e49 Modify two files to specify valid ip addresses. These files are efi/pxe.c and efi/udp.c. In efi/pxe.c: In net_parse_dhcp function. If ProxyOffer has been received, start with DhcpAck packet since it is the most complete. This requires a minimum of changes to the

g'day, i've been using pxelinux for a while on a bunch of machines in a lab. i note your pxelinux site shows configuration for ISC DHCP server - you and others may also find this useful .. most Cisco IOS-based routers (& some IOS-based switches) can run as a DHCP Server. i use them with pxelinux with the following configuration: ip dhcp pool dhcppool-vlan3-host12 host

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jason Matthews > <jason.david.matthews at gmail.com> wrote: > > The setup I was using was in a chassis. Slot 8 of the chassis is the > client > > machine. It goes through Switch 1 (a Brocade switch) to the top of rack > > (BNT). The mirror is in the

Jeff Sloan Software Engineer - Computing Systems Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. (509) 336-2098 jeff_sloan at selinc.com From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> To: Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com>, jeff_sloan at selinc.com, Cc: For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa <syslinux at zytor.com> Date: 09/12/2015 07:35 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH]

Gene, I am very sorry. I did try the patch you suggested and had the same issue. Then, I grabbed the latest patch on Patrick's git repo. That's the commit that I listed. It was posted two days ago. I just noticed this on Patrick's repo: This branch is 6 commits ahead, 2 commits behind geneC:master Jeff Sloan Software Engineer - Computing Systems Schweitzer Engineering

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Jason Matthews <jason.david.matthews at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jason Matthews >> <jason.david.matthews at gmail.com> wrote: >> > The setup I was using was in a chassis. Slot 8 of the chassis is the >>

I tried the efi-fixes-2-for-mfleming, but it doesn't look like it's getting much further. It looks like it's now storing the local port but is still bailing out after the jiffies loop. Here are the pcaps from that: http://ge.tt/4O5N9Az/v/0 I played around with the udp4_cb function and it looked like it was coming back with token->Status == 512, which (if I read the spec right)

Hi All, Now that we have multiboot capable pxelinux, thanks to mboot.c32, I decided to try and remove pxegrub from my x86 jumpstart infrastructure since, in theory, pxelinux can now do it all. The problem I'm having is I'm not very sure I'm following Tim's documentation correctly... I'm not 100% what comes after the --- and whether the Sun kernel needs it's arguments

I have just upgraded my jumpstart server to S10 u2 b9a. It is an Ultra 10 with two 120GB EIDE drives. The second drive (disk1) is new, and has u2b9a installed on a slice, with most of the space in slice 7 for the ZFS pool I created pool1 on disk1, and created the filesystem pool1/ro (for legacy reasons). I them moved my data from the original disk0 UFS file system to pool1/ro. Initially I

Folks; During a jumpstart (2nd boot) of a Sun Fire 240 with Solaris 10 Update 3 (11/06), I noticed the following message; Jun 27 11:43:33 first fbt: NOTICE: cannot instrument return of fd_intr at 7b7d6278: non-canonical return instruction Kernel level was Generic_118833-33. Jumpstart was conducted using the standard JET modules. What gives? The jumpstart worked though. Solaris 10 installed

Hello, I am trying to boot x86 solaris 10 8/07 via a system running fed7 and syslinux 3.62. If I use pxelinux I get the kernel to boot but it doesn't load my network drivers for the Broadcom II nic. I rebuilt the kernel (x86.miniroot) for solaris with the Broadcom nic drivers but it still didn't work. I read some stuff where people were using pxegrub and booting pxegrub.0 but

Hi, thanks. Sorry for the mess with my gmail account... This made the route go away. But is this the right way to configure tinc? To give the tinc interface an IP (with 255.255.255.255 subnetmask) from the local (green) network it does route the traffic to? Does it make sense to give the tinc interface an 192.168.0.253 IP, when the net here is 192.168.0.0/24 on eth1 I can not find such a

Signed-off-by: Julien Viard de Galbert <jviarddegalbert at online.net> --- efi/udp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/efi/udp.c b/efi/udp.c index 1088f47..b0f13ad 100644 --- a/efi/udp.c +++ b/efi/udp.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void core_udp_connect(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, uint32_t ip, } else { udata.UseDefaultAddress = FALSE;

Yes and PXE booting the node worked just fine. It was quite some time ago and the process was rather straightforward. This is for x86_64 use-host-decl-names on; filename "/solaris/pxegrub"; next-server <TFTP SERVER IP>; vendor-option-space SUNW; option SUNW.JumpStart-server "<INSTALLATION SERVER IP>:/exports/Solaris/JUMPSTART/x86"; # BE WARNED: No hostnames.