similar to: Best positioning of GEO IP identifier Apache or Ruby Code

Hi, Problem solved. It was related to SELINUX. The moment it is disabled, BIND service started properly. -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to eXza Technology Consulting & Services, and are intended only for the use of the recipients named above If you are not the addressee you may

[Sorry for cross-posting] Hi everybody, I am part of the Spatial Information Systems Group in University College Dublin. We are conducting a survey on Open-Source technologies with particular focus on Geo-Spatial projects. Our goal is to collect first-hand knowledge about a number of Open- Source projects active on the Internet. With this work we hope to identify strong and weak points of each

Hello. To follow-up this issue, since the upgrade, when i do a named reload it crash, look like there's duplicated zones. Here's the log when i trigger a reload nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: received control channel command 'reload' nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf' nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com

I"m seeing this as well, after I updated my CentOS 7 hosts to the latest release. Something seems to have broken! On 10 May 2018 at 17:54, Tom Diehl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them > is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up > debugging on

options { listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 172.17.2.187; }; //listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; }; directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; allow-query { localhost; 172.17.0.0/16; }; allow-transfer { localhost;

Hi, I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up debugging on dlz_bind as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Debugging_the_BIND9_DLZ_Module When I try to start named I get the following in the logs: May 10 13:19:44 vdc2 named[23773]: starting BIND

Hi, I am trying to upgrade frm INTERNAL DNS to BIND_DLZ. I followed the procedure given in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC and https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End. When I start the BIND Service, it fails with an error. In journalctl -xe we come to know that named service is unbale to open dlz_bind9_9.so file. Full error message

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:39:50 +0100 (CET) Maxence SARTIAUX via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > To follow-up this issue, since the upgrade, when i do a named reload > it crash, look like there's duplicated zones. > > Here's the log when i trigger a reload > > > nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: received control >

Hi everyone, unfortunately, I managed to break my Samba AD DC configuration :-( and would like to ask the experts on this list. When restarting my Samba AC DC I noticed, that it didn't come up properly. samba outputs the following lines to /var/log/syslog > Nov 24 12:46:52 addc01 samba[30784]: /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: > RuntimeError: kinit for ADDC01$@MYDOMAIN.LAN failed (Cannot

Hum... what are these logs related to GeoIP? Perhaps this answer will be a bit rough... anyway: MS AD is complex. Samba team did a great job to reproduce its behaviour but MS product are not reputed to be too stable, so a work-in-progress reproduction of such tool has few chances to be too stable. DNS is complex by itself, especially when using Bind as backend: Bind can do lot of things related

Hi, After upgrading to BIND9_DLZ, BIND service is properly starting. However, DNS updates are failing. When I try to force the DNS update, I get the following error. Even kinit command returns "kinit: Cannot find KDC for realm "EXZA.LOCAL" while getting initial credentials" --------------------------------------- [root at dc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs:

Hello! After updating (only one dc) for samba 4.5.3 is occurring duplicate zone errors, when I run rndc reload Samba_dlz: Ignoring duplicate zone This replied to all my dcs ... When I run: Samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I get the error Update failed: NOTAUTH .... .... Update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries Like this topic to have reference to this,

Bind_DLZ is not loaded Which makes sence if we see the errors.. Verify if this is loaded.. I have it in named.conf.local // adding the dlopen ( Bind DLZ ) module for samba, beware, if you using bind9.9 then you need to change this manualy include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Hi guys, I am following this[1] tutorial to install clang. However, I have made a small change in the configure command, and I am running it with '--enable-optimized' option to avoid the debug build. I am getting the errors (given at the end) related to *undeclared identifiers '__NR_*'*. Can someone please provide some input about how to tackle this issue? On my other machine, I

Hi, I would really like to get rid of this geo-replication session as I am stuck with it right now. For example I can't even stop my volume as it complains about that geo-replcation... Can someone let me know how I can delete it? Thanks > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: How to delete geo-replication session? > Local Time: August 1, 2017 12:15 PM > UTC Time: August

Hi all! Today I have a small gluster replication on 2 machines. My plan is to scale this, I though need some feedback that how I plan things is in the right direction. First of all I have understood the need of an arbiter. When I scale this, say that I just have 2 replica and 1 arbiter, when I add another two machines can I still use the same physical machine as the arbiter? Or when I add

Adding Rahul and Kothresh who are SME on geo replication Thanks & Regards Karan Sandha On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > Hello > > To my two node replica volume I have added an arbiter node for safety > purpose. On that volume I also have geo replication running and would like > to stop it is status "Faulty" and keeps

Hi Karl, I don't see anything mentioning shared storage in the docs and I assume it's now automatic but can you check 'gluster volume get all cluster.enable-shared-storage' ? I would give a try with RH's documentation despite it's old it has some steps (like the shared volume) that might be needed:

When I run the "gluster volume geo-replication status" I see my geo replication session correctly including the volume name under the "VOL" column. I see my two nodes (node1 and node2) but not arbiternode as I have added it later after setting up geo-replication. For more details have a quick look at my previous post here:

On 09/22/2017 02:25 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: > The volume layout of geo-replication slave volume could be different > from master volume. > It's not mandatory that if the master volume is arbiter type, the > slave also needs to be arbiter. > But if it's decided to use the arbiter both at master and slave, then > the expansion rules is > applicable