similar to: Best positioning of GEO IP identifier Apache or Ruby Code

Hi, Problem solved. It was related to SELINUX. The moment it is disabled, BIND service started properly. -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to eXza Technology Consulting & Services, and are intended only for the use of the recipients named above If you are not the addressee you may

[Sorry for cross-posting] Hi everybody, I am part of the Spatial Information Systems Group in University College Dublin. We are conducting a survey on Open-Source technologies with particular focus on Geo-Spatial projects. Our goal is to collect first-hand knowledge about a number of Open- Source projects active on the Internet. With this work we hope to identify strong and weak points of each

Hello. To follow-up this issue, since the upgrade, when i do a named reload it crash, look like there's duplicated zones. Here's the log when i trigger a reload nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: received control channel command 'reload' nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf' nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com

I"m seeing this as well, after I updated my CentOS 7 hosts to the latest release. Something seems to have broken! On 10 May 2018 at 17:54, Tom Diehl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them > is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up > debugging on

options { listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 172.17.2.187; }; //listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; }; directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; allow-query { localhost; 172.17.0.0/16; }; allow-transfer { localhost;

Hi, I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up debugging on dlz_bind as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Debugging_the_BIND9_DLZ_Module When I try to start named I get the following in the logs: May 10 13:19:44 vdc2 named[23773]: starting BIND

Hi, I am trying to upgrade frm INTERNAL DNS to BIND_DLZ. I followed the procedure given in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC and https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End. When I start the BIND Service, it fails with an error. In journalctl -xe we come to know that named service is unbale to open dlz_bind9_9.so file. Full error message

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:39:50 +0100 (CET) Maxence SARTIAUX via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > To follow-up this issue, since the upgrade, when i do a named reload > it crash, look like there's duplicated zones. > > Here's the log when i trigger a reload > > > nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: received control >

Hi everyone, unfortunately, I managed to break my Samba AD DC configuration :-( and would like to ask the experts on this list. When restarting my Samba AC DC I noticed, that it didn't come up properly. samba outputs the following lines to /var/log/syslog > Nov 24 12:46:52 addc01 samba[30784]: /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: > RuntimeError: kinit for ADDC01$@MYDOMAIN.LAN failed (Cannot

Hum... what are these logs related to GeoIP? Perhaps this answer will be a bit rough... anyway: MS AD is complex. Samba team did a great job to reproduce its behaviour but MS product are not reputed to be too stable, so a work-in-progress reproduction of such tool has few chances to be too stable. DNS is complex by itself, especially when using Bind as backend: Bind can do lot of things related

Hi, After upgrading to BIND9_DLZ, BIND service is properly starting. However, DNS updates are failing. When I try to force the DNS update, I get the following error. Even kinit command returns "kinit: Cannot find KDC for realm "EXZA.LOCAL" while getting initial credentials" --------------------------------------- [root at dc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs:

Hello! After updating (only one dc) for samba 4.5.3 is occurring duplicate zone errors, when I run rndc reload Samba_dlz: Ignoring duplicate zone This replied to all my dcs ... When I run: Samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I get the error Update failed: NOTAUTH .... .... Update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries Like this topic to have reference to this,

Bind_DLZ is not loaded Which makes sence if we see the errors.. Verify if this is loaded.. I have it in named.conf.local // adding the dlopen ( Bind DLZ ) module for samba, beware, if you using bind9.9 then you need to change this manualy include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Hi guys, I am following this[1] tutorial to install clang. However, I have made a small change in the configure command, and I am running it with '--enable-optimized' option to avoid the debug build. I am getting the errors (given at the end) related to *undeclared identifiers '__NR_*'*. Can someone please provide some input about how to tackle this issue? On my other machine, I

Hi, I would really like to get rid of this geo-replication session as I am stuck with it right now. For example I can't even stop my volume as it complains about that geo-replcation... Can someone let me know how I can delete it? Thanks > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: How to delete geo-replication session? > Local Time: August 1, 2017 12:15 PM > UTC Time: August

Hi all! Today I have a small gluster replication on 2 machines. My plan is to scale this, I though need some feedback that how I plan things is in the right direction. First of all I have understood the need of an arbiter. When I scale this, say that I just have 2 replica and 1 arbiter, when I add another two machines can I still use the same physical machine as the arbiter? Or when I add

Adding Rahul and Kothresh who are SME on geo replication Thanks & Regards Karan Sandha On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > Hello > > To my two node replica volume I have added an arbiter node for safety > purpose. On that volume I also have geo replication running and would like > to stop it is status "Faulty" and keeps

When I run the "gluster volume geo-replication status" I see my geo replication session correctly including the volume name under the "VOL" column. I see my two nodes (node1 and node2) but not arbiternode as I have added it later after setting up geo-replication. For more details have a quick look at my previous post here:

On 09/22/2017 02:25 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: > The volume layout of geo-replication slave volume could be different > from master volume. > It's not mandatory that if the master volume is arbiter type, the > slave also needs to be arbiter. > But if it's decided to use the arbiter both at master and slave, then > the expansion rules is > applicable

Hi, When S3 is added to master volume from new node, the following cmd should be run to generate and distribute ssh keys 1. Generate ssh keys from new node #gluster system:: execute gsec_create 2. Push those ssh keys of new node to slave #gluster vol geo-rep <mastervol> <slavehost>::<slavevol> create push-pem force 3. Stop and start geo-rep But note that