similar to: Trying to unpack httparty into my rails project

I have a model that calls: include HTTParty but also gets cached using cache-money. It seems that they both add a "get" method to ActiveRecord, and they collide when I try to use both of them. What''s the best way to fix this? If it''s a namespace of some kind, how do I set up httparty so that I have to call HTTParty::get instead of plain "get"? Is there a

Are these two competing gems? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: R v1.7.0 OS: WinXP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.2.229) There seems to be an upper limit of the number of files (approx 1000 files) a zip-file can contain when unpacking it with zip.unpack(). This results in an R crash. This bug is urgent since install.packages() relies on zip.unpack() and too big packages/bundles won't install with the current R

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: R v1.7.0 OS: WinXP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.2.229) There seems to be an upper limit of the number of files (approx 1000 files) a zip-file can contain when unpacking it with zip.unpack(). This results in an R crash. This bug is urgent since install.packages() relies on zip.unpack() and too big packages/bundles won't install with the current R

Hello all, I am have an app that is hosted on heroku (rails 4 | ruby 2.0) that I am using paperclip-dropbox to upload attachments to a blog. I have created a download link for people who read the blog to be able to download the attachments but I am not able to get the file to actually download via the browser. I am curious if anyone knows what could be the issue. My process is I download the

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: R v1.7.0 OS: WinXP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.2.229) There seems to be an upper limit of the number of files (approx 1000 files) a zip-file can contain when unpacking it with zip.unpack(). This results in an R crash. This bug is urgent since install.packages() relies on zip.unpack() and too big packages/bundles won't install with the current R

.tar.gz files are first archived up with the 'tar' program, then compressed with the 'gzip' program (.gz extension); most browsers are notorious for un-gzipping a .tar.gz file without renaming it. Since you're using Windows, it is very likely that the .gz extension is confusing your archiver because it expects it to be a .tar file within a .gz file, when in fact it's just

Hi I'm trying to unzip the source code for the Speex Encoder, but I'm not having much success. I've tried using WinZip (unregistered version 8.0) and PowerArchive (version 6.1). Neither of them open the files "speex-1.0rc2.tar.gz" or "refman.tar.gz". What am I doing wrong? Many thanks Jim --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

Package: libxen-dev,libxs-dev Version: libxen-dev/4.1.2-3 Version: libxs-dev/1.0.1-1 Severity: serious User: treinen at debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2012-04-12 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem:

Hi all, If you take a look at the service.rb file in the win32-service repository (the new one in the toplevel repository path), I''ve got this bit of code, which succeeds, but I can''t seem to unpack the data structure properly. Did I pack it wrong to begin with? I should know this but I''m spacing out. proc_status =

Author: marks Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 30d7e3669aa20772767cb9726d60c32659192c23 Log message: 6395977 unpack dump core when run over NFSv4 over ZFS Files: update: usr/src/cmd/compress/compress.c update: usr/src/cmd/pack/pack.c update: usr/src/cmd/unpack/unpack.c

I'm not sure when exactly this started, but currently when I specify a ramfs image via the initrd line in grub, kinit picks it up as an initrd and tries (and fails) to unpack it and run linuxrc from it. I'm assuming this is not the intended behavior. Can anyone point me into the proper direction for unpacking an initramfs image ontop of the in-kernel image? Currently, I am using kernel

I think I did this once a long time ago, but don't recall clearly.... How do I unpack a .rar file? tnx.

Hello all, I have seen a similar post on the site, but did not see any resolution. On a fresh "binary" install on CentOS 4.2, I have created the following config file kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6-xenU.img" builder= "linux" memory = 128 vcpus = 1 name = "api.beta.s56.net" disk = [

Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69 Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9 Severity: serious User: treinen at debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2009-08-18 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the

Dear all, Does R has any function/package that can pack and unpack string into bit size? The reason I want to do this in R is that R has much more native statistical function than Perl. Yet the data I need to process is so large that it required me to compress it into smaller unit -> process it -> finally recover them back again into string with new information. In Perl the

Previous kernel was 4.13.0-10.1-liquorix-amd64 The updated kernel that I'm having trouble was not liquorix -- was straight from Debian. Here's my apt log: Log started: 2018-01-02 12:04:48 (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5% (Reading database ... 10% (Reading database ... 15% (Reading database ... 20% (Reading database ... 25% (Reading database ... 30% (Reading database ...

On 23 March 2016 at 09:35, Barnet Wagman wrote: | I am unable to install R on an up to date (i.e. apt upgraded) Ubuntu | 14.04 system. According to | https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README (and many other sources), | R is available for this version of Ubuntu (which is a stable version). | | I currently have | | deb https://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu trusty/ | | in

Synaptic can show the origin of packages. The only thing I see from a backport is libcmanager0 I don't think this is relevant to R. Or is it. The only thing I've got installed from a ppa is mate (a desktop). I don't see anything related to mate that is related to R. FYI the ubunu I'm using came preinstalled from Dell (on a notebook; usually I install linux myself). On

It's a Dell XPS 13. Obviously I don't understand what's in libcmanager0. I wonder if I can safely replace it. I'm a bit uneasy about replacing things Dell installed. I gather there are some specialized drivers for the monitor on this system. On 03/23/2016 11:34 AM, Alex M wrote: > That could do it > http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty-backports/libcgmanager0 > >