Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Fw: wondershaper kills eth0 :("
2006 Nov 20
2
Fwd: Traffic Shaping on a Transparent Bridge not working!
I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box.
This note was originally sent to their maillist,
because the LARTC list appears to have been down
for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded
with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response
to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: drew einhorn
2004 Feb 03
4
wondershaper
Hi,
I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have
roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get
225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes).
What should the settings in wshaper?
I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec
with full upload traffic.
Mark
2006 Sep 16
1
Wondershaper Errors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
when I activate wondershaper on my dsl connection (pppoa vc mux), i get
three errors:
# sh -x /usr/sbin/wshaper ppp0
+ /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_downlink
+ DOWNLINK=
+ /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_uplink
+ UPLINK=
+ [ -z ]
+ cat /proc/avalanche/avsar_modem_stats
+ grep Connection Rate
+ awk {printf("%d", $8)}
+
2007 Jun 24
5
Traffic shaping on multiple interfaces
I''m trying to setup traffic shaping on my linux gateway/router.
The system has 3 interfaces:
eth0 - My LAN - with IP address 192.168.0.254
eth1 - The ethernet connection to which my ADSL modem is connected. This
has a 10.25.x.x IP, more on this later. The ADSL link has an upstream of
~1.2mbit.
ppp0 - The PPP connection which is my WAN connection, with a real world IP.
The system acts
2003 Oct 21
14
Prioritizing traffic
I don''t know whether this is the right place to ask, but kindly point me to
an FM that I can R if it isn''t.
My wife is creating lots of Kazaa traffic, and I am using rsync to create a
full mirror of Red Hat''s FTP site, Aurora Linux FTP site, the LDP site, and
some other stuff. Clearly, when one is moving well over 100GB over a 128
Kbps link, this is going to take a
2004 May 31
1
Wondershaper - question
Hi,
I have a question conercing wondershaper. I''m using the Clarkconnect linux
distribution for my linux router and I tried to use wondershaper.
On start up of wshaper, there are no errors or any other problems but I''m
not sure if it''s running correctly. Only one qdisc / one class is used and
when I start an uplink ftp transfer, my ping time is growing up to 1700ms -
I
2002 Dec 07
4
Why my script doesn''t work ???
Hi All,
I''m using iptables-1.2.7a on RedHat8 kernel 2.4.20.
I wanted to limit the file-sharing traffic to the internet.
I marked the packets with iptables:
iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d !
192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1024:1862 -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d !
192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1864:65535 -j MARK --set-mark 1
2004 Jul 10
3
limiting doesn''t work
Hi folks,
I read the fantastic LARTC How-to and after that i tried to limit one
host in my LAN for both down-and upload bandwidth usage.
I took section 15.9. and added uplink-limiting as I understood it from
the previous chapters.
Unfortunately it doesn''t work.
I ran the script and went to the specified PC, started a download, and
watched the rate. The rate was always about 2000 kbit/s,
2007 Sep 01
9
complete linux and shaping newbie needs help
Hi there good people,
I''m a newbie in what concerns running Linux on machines other than
desktops, so I need help from all you gurus out there :-)
I have Linux installed on an old computer (Winchip C6, Pentium clone),
acting as a router/firewall for two other computers. Both these
machines are connected to the firewall via a dedicated ethernet card
each, on different subnets,
2004 Apr 16
1
Traffic Shaping using Shorewall and WonderShaper
Hi Guys,
I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources
for understanding how to get it to work.
I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s
web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts.
Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to.
I''ve also read through the lartc
2002 Oct 15
1
Réf . : Re: trying to use wondershaper on a dedicated line (not adsl)
here''s the output :
# tc -s -d class show dev eth0
class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio
no-transmit/8 weight 10Mbit allot 1514b
level 2 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 23us
Sent 294 bytes 7 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 605 undertime 0
class cbq 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: rate 100Kbit cell 8b prio 1/1 weight
100Kbit allot 1600b
2004 Aug 13
1
Shaping weirdness
I''ve been following the HOWTO, and reading mailing list discussions
about throttling bandwidth, and have had some success, but I just want
to tie off some loose ends. Essentially what I am wanting to do is to
keep our bandwidth usage below 1megabit, because if we go over we get
charged for that traffic. I''ve used some of the examples from the
HOWTO to limit our bandwidth, but I
2004 Apr 09
2
Bandwidth limiting for each computer in subnet
Dear members
I''m new to this list and also new to tc command.
I have a subnet with over 30 pc which have ip addresses from 172.16.1.1/16 range.I want that each computer in my subnet can work with internet with maximum 6k for download and maximum 6k for upload.when i run the following tc commands from my bridge the first pc works well but the second pc can not work with 6k and it has an
2004 Feb 08
1
wondershaper htb + multiple ports
Is there a way to apply wondershaper w/ htb to a port range?
I have a ftp server on port 65432 and passive ports 50000-60000.
Is there a way to set a range? or do they have to be individually
listed?
The following doesnt seem to work:
# low priority source ports
NOPRIOPORTSRC=65432, 50000:60000
# low priority destination ports
NOPRIOPORTDST=
Mark
2002 Dec 17
5
WonderShaper on LAN link kills to-host speed
I tried installing the WonderShaper on my internal link, mostly to get the
SFQ installed. I set uplink and downlink to 100000 to match the link speed
and changed the bandwidth on the cbq line to 100mbit. This killed transfer
speed *to* the box, knocking it from 30-40 Mbps down to about 800 kbps.
Commenting out just the ingress control restored the speed.
What about the ingress policer would do
2007 Dec 05
3
Adding qdiscs crashes kernel??
Hi all,
I''m having some problems setting up qdiscs on a bridge.The config looks
a little like this:
ifconfig ifb0 up # Bring up the IFB for this bridge.
tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress
tc qdisc add dev eth3 ingress
tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000
cell 8
# Raw qdiscs on each bridge port
tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth
2006 Sep 14
10
tc is giving an error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Hello,
I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a
working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more
sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error:
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion
of the script (the whole script shapes several
2004 Dec 22
4
how to add burstable rate?
Hi,
I managed to fix 128kbit for an IP address of 192.168.200.3 as below: -
tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit
tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 128kbit allot 1500
prio 5 bounded isolated
tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst
192.168.200.3 flowid 1:1
tc qdisc add dev eth3 parent 1:1 sfq perturb 10
How can I
2003 Sep 04
3
CBQ Rate
Hi everyone,
This is on a linux box, ingress (eth1) at 100Mb/s and egress (eth0) at
10Mb/s. The purpose is to test CBQ
Here is my script
-------------------------------------------------------------------
# Root qdisc
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \
avpkt 1000 cell 8
# Classes
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \
rate 5Mbit weight
2004 Dec 23
1
does the inbound traffic affect the outbound on 2 different interfaces
hey guys
i am regulating the traffic to & fro by my network through a
linux gateway , its behaving strange. i regulated Downlink to 2Mbps &
UPlLINK to 500Kbps. both perform well when those are done independent
i.e. one at a time
but when i do both from a client system ..the downlink however
continues at 2mbps but the uplink falls down to 100kbps?
is something wrong with my script or