similar to: validates_presence_of fails with false boolean

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "validates_presence_of fails with false boolean"

2007 Feb 26
2
boolean db fields set to false fail validation with validates_presence_of?
I have a model that contains a :boolean field. In my view, I have a simple select of Yes or No, which equates to true or false, respectively. If I choose yes and save, everything works great. If I choose no, my model fails validation as I have this set as a required field using validates_presence_of. I have checked the log and it''s definitely set to false, why would this fail validation?
2006 May 22
2
Weirdness with validates_presence_of
Hi, I have a call to validates_presence_of in my model and it is behaving very strangely my first stab when this happened during testing was validates_presence_of :impact, :ease_to_implement if Proc.new { |record| !record.cost_estimate.nil? } I have three values in my model that I care about with this one. Basically what I''m trying to get to happen is if one is there they all must be
2006 Dec 15
4
Why won't Rails update my object attributes?
Here''s the issue: When I submit a form for updating, @person.update_attributes doesn''t work. But the next nested clause for updating images DOES work. How is that possible? However no matter what I do the Person object will not change its attributes. def edit @person = Person.find(params[:id]) if request.post? @person.update_attributes(params[:person])
2007 May 01
2
Problem validating boolean
Hi I''ve got a problem validating a boolean and I can''t see what the problem is. Here''s my model: class FinanceAgreement < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :asset validates_presence_of :finance_company validates_inclusion_of :balance, :in => 0.01..10_000_000 validates_inclusion_of :term, :in => 1..600 validates_numericality_of
2008 Nov 01
2
stuck on a validates_presence_of unless issue
i have a person object. Persons don''t need to have addresses, but if they have any address field value, they must have them all. So I have something like this: validates_presence_of :street_address, :city, :state, :postal_code unless :address_blank? address_blank? checks whether all of the address fields are blank. If I run a test like this, it works: describe "given
2006 Jul 27
9
Introspecting validates_presence_of
Hello people, I''d like to detect whether an attribute of a model has vaildates_presence_of applied to it so I can automatically apply a mandatory (*) to the field...it doesn''t look easy...any ideas? Cheers, -- Dan Webb http://www.danwebb.net
2006 Aug 16
0
validates_presence_of non-null float/boolean/integer fields
Has anyone figured out a way to get validates_presence_of to work with float, boolean, and integer fields that are defined as non-null in the schema? The problem is, ruby intializes these types to the default schema value, which for mysql is never null if the column is not allowed to be null, and as a result they are initialized in the form with a value, and are never null. I found a work
2008 May 06
10
Best way to implement?
So I''m new to all this Rails stuff and this is probably a database design-related question to, but here it is... Just for learning I''m trying to build a little real estate listings application. Of course there is the listings model which will store basic information like name, price, description, and all that jazz. I''m to the point where I want to figure out how to
2006 Apr 08
4
Calling validates_inclusion_of out of default namespace
Hi, I''m trying to run the "validates_inclusion_of" method in a before_save hook, because the range is dependant on the related data. But I can''t figure out how to call it. When calling it normally, it says it can''t find it. I''ve tried several combinations like "ActiveRecord::Validations.validates_inclusion_of", but I can''t seem to
2011 Feb 16
5
validates_inclusion_of with range on ruby 1.9
I found out today that Range#include? behaves differently on 1.9 than on 1.8 ( http://rhnh.net/2009/08/03/range-include-in-ruby-1-9 ) In order to deal with various edge cases, instead of just checking whether range.first <= value <= range.last, in ruby 1.9 include? steps through all the values in the range, checking for equality. This is of course a lot slower - in my case, checking a date
2007 Jan 17
2
rake test and validates_inclusion_of
Hello, I am just starting off with Rails, so I apologize in advance if there is a terribly obvious answer to my problem. I''ve done some searching and found similar problems to my own, but nothing which yielded a solution. I have a handful of models that I am unit testing. The tests for each unit run successfully, but when I do a rake test, many of the tests fail. The assertions that
2007 Oct 13
4
Chapter 9
Hello, I''m currently stunk on this issue for few days and I do not know how to get it fixed. The system always raises this error message : order is closed and here is my order.rb: class Order < ActiveRecord::Base include ActiveMerchant::Billing before_validation :set_status attr_protected :id, :customer_ip, :status, :error_message, :updated_at, :created_at attr_accessor
2006 Jul 27
0
Why is false.blank? => true ?
When using a boolean attribute, often you want to insure that it has a value that is either false or true, but not null. One would think that "validates_presence_of :boolean_attribute" would work for such a purpose, but it does not, because false.blank? => true. I''m guessing this is the expected behavior, but I''m wondering about the rationale. blank? would imply
2007 Mar 13
13
validates_inclusion_of disabling
Hello all. I have a problem using validates_inclusion_of. I need to switch off some validations during a migration period, is there a way? I tried to use if, with a static method of one of my models, but the behaviour is something strange It seems that the static method should be in a string to be evaluated. And the order of the elements in the if is counting... :if => (:some_field
2006 Feb 14
2
confusion with validates_inclusion_of
It appears that if your trying to use validates_inclusion_of for a string value allow_nil wont work. For example, if I have an attribute :year which is stored as a varchar then: validates_inclusion_of :year, :in => "1980"..Time.now.year.to_s, allow_nil=>true will successfully validate the range but will not allow an empty input field to be submitted. However, if :year is
2007 Jan 18
2
Conditional validates_inclusion_of execution problem
All, I have a field that I''m validating with validates_numericality_of on as well as validates_inclusion_of, like so: validates_numericality_of :number_of_owners, :only_integer => true, :message => ''must be a whole number'' validates_inclusion_of :number_of_owners, :in => 1..3,
2008 Feb 22
7
undefined local variable or method "acts_as_list"?
Hi, I''m getting the error below, and I''m not sure where to find "acts_as_list" ... NameError in SpecialsController#printer undefined local variable or method `acts_as_list'' for #<Class: 0xb7a46994> RAILS_ROOT: /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/dps Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace vendor/plugins/trunk/lib/scope_out.rb:70:in
2006 May 26
4
Using ''validates_inclusion_of'' to validate foreign key
I seem to be missing something trying to use ''validates_inclusion_of'' to validate a foreign key and was hoping some one could piont out my mistake? The problem seems to be that Order.find_all.collect is not returning an array that contains the order_id, if I replace it with a hardcoded array everything works as expected. The model: class OrderItem < ActiveRecord::Base
2008 Jan 31
4
RSpec-1.1.3
RSpec-1.1.3 has been released. If you''re using RSpec and autotest, you''ll have to upgrade to RSpec-1.1.3 and ZenTest-3.9.0 at the same time. == Version 1.1.3 Maintenance release. * Tightened up exceptions list in autotest/rails_spec. Closes #264. * Applied patch from Ryan Davis for ZenTest-3.9.0 compatibility * Applied patch from Kero to add step_upcoming to story listeners.
2007 Mar 30
10
check_box_tag not passing 0 when unchecked?
Code: <%= check_box_tag("person[#{person.id}][is_approved]", 1, true) %> Rendered output: <input checked="checked" id="person[7][is_approved]" name="person[7][is_approved]" value="1" type="checkbox"> Problem: The value of "1" is always passed, even if the box is UNCHECKED. Suggestions? Thanks! -- Posted via