similar to: (no subject)

Am 23.06.2020 08:43, schrieb Luca Bertoncello: And another thing, I discovered right now... > Could you suggest me something to restrict the problem? > Currently, I think the problem can be: > > 1) on Asterisk > 2) on my Gateway/Firewall A couple of years ago I added this entry in my firewall: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS

Hello every one, first time poster, four month shorewaller ;) As the subject states, I''ve been experienced the infamous trouble described in the next excerpt from shorewall.conf # MSS CLAMPING # # Set this variable to "Yes" or "yes" if you want the TCP "Clamp MSS to PMTU" # option. This option is most commonly required when your internet # interface is some

I sent the message below to this list over a week ago, and I haven''t seen any response. If this is not the correct forum for my question, can anyone suggest a better person or place to which I should direct it? Thank you, Jonathan Kamens ------- Start of forwarded message ------- From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] MSS

What for OS is the server and windows clients? The VPN tunnel, are you lowering MTU sizes? Something like: -A FORWARD -m policy --pol ipsec --dir in -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -m tcpmss --mss 1361:1536 -j TCPMSS --set-mss 1360 On the client PC's, have you checkout the windows firewall and are you allowing the remote subnets. The samba server on the

I see support in shorewall for the KAME-tools, how about strongswan ? I have setup shorewall 3.4.4 and strongswan 4.1.3, making this my vpn-gateway for the subnet behind it. # Shorewall version 3.4 - Zones File #ZONE TYPE OPTIONS IN OUT # OPTIONS OPTIONS fw firewall fil ipsec mode=tunnel mss=1400 net ipv4

Am 22.06.2020 um 17:41 schrieb Marek Greško: Hi > try pinging your sip peer ip address following way: > > ping -n -M do -s 1300 -i 0.1 -c 100 ${ipaddress} > > Post several lines and the statistics. root at bpi:/etc/asterisk# ping -n -M do -s 1300 -i 0.1 -c 100 tel.t-online.de PING tel.t-online.de (217.0.128.133) 1300(1328) bytes of data. 1308 bytes from 217.0.128.133:

just to verify basic facts: Did you cross check vie network sniff, on which SMB protocol versions Server + Win 7 clients agree ? Or did you pin down via registry ? AFAIK only starting with win 8 or win 10 clients you could ask with powershell, which protocol version is in use. Did you also cross check samba logs for a name resolution issue ( windows names, not DNS) if one of your boxes is an

As counter example. My slowest server, AMD E350 2 core, max 1.6Gz. On 1Gb lan, disk 2x 5400rpm software raid 1 + 1 ssd. Copy Speed 115Mb/s as in max 1Gb bandwith, from a win7 and win10 pc to the raid1. File sizes. 100Mb+ get max 115Mb/s to a 4MB blocksized partition. 1-10mb files ,max 90-115Mb/s to a 1MB blocksized partition. 0.0-1mb files ,max 60-100Mb/s to a 4k blocksized partition.

current content below is annotated by some suggestions of things to add along with questions for those who know more than I do [in brackets] ================ # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu This calculates the proper MSS for your link. [If I understand the code correctly ... - expert intervention invited] More precisely, this sets the

Hi, I have the shown (end of this post) net work configuration. In a "few" words: My Debian Sarge server is connected to a D-Link ADSL Router (DSL-562T). DMZ is enabled for the Debian Sarge IP on the Router. My Linux server has two NIC''s. ethlan = internal Net ethdsl = external -> D-Link My Linux server is configured to make NAT via iptables. Current state -

Hi Here is a short description of my network: ppp0 (adsl) ppp1 (adsl) | | | | --------------------- | Router | | Firewall | | MASQUERAD | | DNAT | | | | eth0 | --------------------- | | | ---------------------- |

Hi ! I have a single host which is connected via an 512kbit ADSL link to the n= et. I quite often use some realaudio application that uses some bandwidth = and I want to avoid other traffic to scale that bandwidth down. So I used = some classes (with htb) on imq0 device and applied some filters and it see= ms to work in most cases. However, there are some sites with which downloa= d is

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443 ------- Additional Comments From nothingel@hotmail.com 2006-02-08 05:35 MET ------- I also, the situation described in bug ID 322 seemed related and I tried the patch from Phil Oester but it did not make a difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving

Hello, I am facing some problems in bridged networking. I have successfully created a bridge br0 and added a virtual machine to it. Now the address of virtual machine is 10.1.3.31. I am able to connect to this virtual machine by another computer on same network. The virtual machine is hosting a simple python http server on port 8000, while some other service is running on port 80 When I try

> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had > the most affect on performance: > (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core i7-980x   and  a Raid 10 Disk array. The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver traffic) during downloads. There is no encryption because the samba VM

Hai, Im wondering here.. If the client is a windows 10 pc connecting, > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:419(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:761(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > ../source3/smbd/process.c:554(receive_smb_talloc) > receive_smb_raw_talloc failed for client > ipv4:10.55.66.82:59271 read error = NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_RESET. And i

Hi, we are using Tinc in our Freifunk Network in Oldenburg for internode connections over the internet. So Tinc is running on OpenWrt 10.03 on Dlink Dir-300 Routers. We all have enough internet bandwith (1,6 MB/sec and more) but we only get a maximum speed of ~350KB/sec between two tinc nodes because then tinc uses 99% of the cpu. Is it possible to get more Speed with tinc on this machines?

> -----Original Message----- > From: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> On Behalf Of Rowland penny via > samba > Sent: fredag 30. august 2019 09:57 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] no DNS functionality on second subnet > > On 30/08/2019 07:00, Andreas Habel via samba wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba

Hello Tom, now here''s my dump file as .zip attachment, but named .txt, because the list-server rejected the .zip, then my second try (uncompressed) was rejected because of the size. What I was doing is connecting from remote side of an ipsec tunnel (behind gw 212.168.178.226), from a windows machine with 192.168.246.20 to the firewall-system (remote ip 217.19.188.182 / internal ip is

On 24/04/19 19:51, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> Rowland Penny via samba >> Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2019 12:13 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue >> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:58 +0200