similar to: Fair Bandwidth sharing with HTB and EFSQ

Hello everyone, I have a problem regarding gre tunneling, I have two linux box both of them has a private network and the linux A is connected to the internet via wireless radio and the other linux B is connected to the internet via lease line. Here is the setup of my two linux box Linux A eth0 = 203.189.x.1 (internet) eth1 = 192.168.1.1 (going to hub private network) Linux B eth0 = 205.198.x.1

Hello, it seems, that filtering on nexthdr (TCP/UDP) content, especially src or dst port, is not working. The following has no effect on 2.4.16 or older (even 2.2) kernels: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match tcp dst 3128 0xffff police rate 40kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Even if # tc filter ls dev eth0 parent ffff: filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 filter protocol

Hello all! As far as I know that the traffic that will pass thru the router is balanced so that all connections have the same privilegies. Is it possible to configure the linux based router so that all computers will have the same privilegies? I mean that if in default case full traffic is splitted by connections, so I need to split it by users to prevent one user occupy all traffic by starting

Hi, for interested in participation on finishing new HTB developement I created simple docs regarding it. It is some insight into CBQ and HTB workings and problems. See luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/

I noticed the "XXX: what should this be?" w.r.t. COPY_SIZE in sftp-client.c. I made up the following quick patch to allow a new command-line argument, "-B" (for 'buffer' size) to specify this value. I haven't done any strict benchmarking yet, but -B65535 is faster than -B8192 which is much faster than -B16. PS again, I am not on this list, so please CC me any

I find the negative attitude toward CBQ to be distracting and non-professional in the HOWTO. I''ve re-read it for the first time in about a month and comments like "This can be configured in a variety of ways, which I do not understand. Use HTB" do not encourage me about the writer. This is not a personal critique, as I can imagine this being said on a personal website,

Hello there, i am continuing with the development of the iproute GUI. I was wondering if there is a xml parser for the set up of the queues. I have been searching but i cant find any... anyone?

I have had a brief discussion with Damien Miller (below) about storing host port values in the known_hosts file so as to track multiple ssh sessions (with independant keys) that run on a single host but accept connections on different ports. If it were possible to state that a given key for a remote host belonged to that host's ssh session on port 23 and that another key belonged to that

I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet connections do NOT have equal bandwidth How do I configure the SNAT/MASQ and ensure sharing of the gateways with the correct ratio of usage and with the correct source IP address? I

While I''m thinking about that review of howto changes, here are a few other responses about things I don''t believe. I''ll be interested in more info if anyone has any. ==== [from new doc] Besides being classful, CBQ is also a shaper and it is in that aspect that it really doesn''t work very well. It should work like this. I''ve not noticed that it

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

Can someone tell me what concept I''m missing here. The setup is simple. I have two default routes after ifup operations. I use "ip route del" to remove one, but then decide to add it back. The attempt is refused. Why? # ip route ls 66.95.83.208/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 66.95.83.210 65.84.205.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 65.84.205.104

Hello guys I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection equally.. The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC.. I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in

We are using OpenSSH (portable) version 3.0.1p1 on Linux 2.2.14-10 with RedHat's distribution of PAM 0.72-20.6.x for rsync'ing RRDTool data between two machines (among other things). When running 'rsync -essh -avz', everything works fine but the system log on the sshd side shows: PAM_pwdb[8021]: authentication failure; (uid=0) -> rrd for sshd service sshd[8021]: Accepted

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

Dear list: I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful with anybody who can help me. I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to share between several computers. I have eth0, with a public IP address, conected to Internet, and also, eth1, with a private IP address, for network with the surfing computers. I have a main class with

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what''s the diferences between HTB and CBQ? Bye - -- ======================================== Netsite S/A - Security Officer Profissional Certificado Conectiva Linux www.kidmumu.com.br - UIN 4553082 ======================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see

Guys Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great input! I don''t want to mention names, I''ll most certainly leave someone out. With this mail I''d like to test some theory on bandwidth management, with my own successes and failures during the past year. Sharing a link between 200

I have a block of IP addresses (2048) used for ADSL connections to customers. In order to provide a fair slice of available bandwidth on the contended services I would like to be able to set up some kind of SFQ filter, but using a hash of the destination IP address rather than the the full source and destination ip and port. This would be done at the Internet side gateway for traffic being

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________