similar to: question about "ignore system acls"

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

Okay then :-( I think I'll have to divide our shares into two categories: 1. One with "nt acl support = no" which I'd consider the "pure Linux security" category. 2. Probably another category with "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes", as a "pure Windows security" category. It would be better to have an underlying OS with native NFSv4 ACL support

Dear Rowland, I'm trying to write a single email answering all the question of your recent emails: > Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about > this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? Well, not exactly :-) Only 5 months and 5 days :-) However, this specific thread is only 9 days old. I had a few mails in january, february,

On 16/06/2023 16:20, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: > Dear Rowland, > > I'm trying to write a single email answering all the question of your > recent emails: > > >> Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about >> this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? > > Well, not exactly :-) Only 5 months and 5

Hi Eric, On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 05:56:51PM -0600, Eric Eastman via samba wrote: > I was testing Samba 4.5rc2 with an existing smb.conf file that I have been > using since Samba 4.1.x and found that I cannot access data in the share on > Windows 2012 (my AD server), a Windows 2008 client or on a Ubuntu 16.04 > client. I built a new version of Samba 4.4.5 using the same procedure as I

Hi Eric, On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 07:57:36AM -0600, Eric Eastman wrote: > >> The line causing the problem with 4.5rc2 is: > >> acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes > > > > this change was introduced in > > <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028> > > > > Before explaining the gory details, one question: why are you setting > >

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:21:37PM +0300, Uri Simchoni wrote: > On 08/18/2016 08:28 AM, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 05:56:51PM -0600, Eric Eastman via samba wrote: > >> I was testing Samba 4.5rc2 with an existing smb.conf file that I have been > >> using since Samba 4.1.x and found that I cannot access data in the share on

On 2016-08-18 at 12:21 +0300, Uri Simchoni via samba wrote: > On 08/18/2016 08:28 AM, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 05:56:51PM -0600, Eric Eastman via samba wrote: > >> I was testing Samba 4.5rc2 with an existing smb.conf file that I have been > >> using since Samba 4.1.x and found that I cannot access data in the share on

On 26/03/2020 20:08, Bob Wyatt wrote: > From: Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> > Sent: Saturday, February 29, 2020 8:48 AM > To: sambalist <samba at lists.samba.org> > Subject: Re: [Samba] net ADS join MEMBER > > On 28/02/2020 23:22, Bob Wyatt wrote: >> Hi, Rowland, >> >> Joined the domain successfully. >> Winbindd and smbd started without

Please note that the tarball is available, but the v3-6-stable git branch and the websites cannot be updated right now because of technical problems. Thank you for your understanding. =================================================================== "A great artist is always before his time or behind it." George Edward Moore

Please note that the tarball is available, but the v3-6-stable git branch and the websites cannot be updated right now because of technical problems. Thank you for your understanding. =================================================================== "A great artist is always before his time or behind it." George Edward Moore

Hi Ralph, >> The line causing the problem with 4.5rc2 is: >> acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes > > this change was introduced in > <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028> > > Before explaining the gory details, one question: why are you setting > this option? I am setting this option per the vfs_acl_xattr.8 man page recommendations. Using a

On 15/06/2023 16:18, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? In your last post there was this: [quote] this "piling up" of ACL information doesn't happen either on a native Windows file server or with vfs_acl_xattr [/quote] Does this mean you do not

Rowland, The wiki suggested doing "smbd -b | grep HAVE_LIBACL" and expecting to get back "HAVE_LIBACL". This is not the case on our IBM system with 4.10.6. The current version from IBM is 4.10.13 - considering upgrading in the hopes "HAVE_LIBACL" is present if I really need it. On the other hand, "smbd -b" does report that smbd was built with vfs_aixacl

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba

On 08/18/2016 08:28 AM, Ralph Böhme wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 05:56:51PM -0600, Eric Eastman via samba wrote: >> I was testing Samba 4.5rc2 with an existing smb.conf file that I have been >> using since Samba 4.1.x and found that I cannot access data in the share on >> Windows 2012 (my AD server), a Windows 2008 client or on a Ubuntu 16.04 >>

=================================================================== "Food is for eating, and good food is to be enjoyed... I think food is, actually, very beautiful in itself." Delia Smith ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in

=================================================================== "Food is for eating, and good food is to be enjoyed... I think food is, actually, very beautiful in itself." Delia Smith ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in