similar to: Delete All action

Hi, I was wondering if anybody who used jQuery with rails could help me out. I have a droppable that fires a simple function, shown below: $("#list").droppable({ accept: ".item", hoverClass: ''droppable-hover'', drop: function(ev, ui) { $(this).append("<br>Dropped!"); } }); But how could I get this to fire a Rails funciton in the

Hi I noticed that if in my code I use the following: Photo.update_all("title = ''Ruby rocks'' ", "id IN (#{@photo_ids})") All my objects are properly updated but none of the filters/callbacks are triggered. Is that what''s expected? I have a before_update filter set on the Photo class and it gets totally ignored, I guess the only way to solve this

Hi all, When i use the ''delete_all'' function to remove a few rows from my database, it causes a deadlock on the sql server. The delete seems to be successful, it then redirects to the ''view'' page, and the record does appear to be deleted as far as the ''view'' rails page shows. BUT if i go into sql query analyser, i can''t do a

Hi all, I have a table structure with me not having an id column. When I try to delete the row i get an error ''Unknown column "table.id"''. Can i do the action with any other method than destroy/delete? Or with the same method and any other conditions? Thanks. Sainaba. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m using Rails-1.1.4 with Ruby-1.8.4 So let''s say I have 2 model classes: class Item has_and_belongs_to_many :things end class Thing has_and_belongs_to_many :items end i = Item.new i.things << Thing.new( :value => "Something").save i.things << Thing.new( :value => "Something Else" ).save i.save Fine, now I have two records in the

I''m trying to use has_many :through, since my join model deserves being more than just an intersection table. But when I try to break the association, the break only seems "temporary": Let''s say my two tables are Users and Colors, and the join model is Favorites. user = Users.find(1) user.colors.length >> 2 c = user.colors.first >> #<Color:....>

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2224994/why-are-double-sided-polymorphic-relationships-lacking-in-rails -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi, I''ve been having a problem getting highlighting to work with aaf. I have a class defined as follows such: class Link < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_ferret :fields => { :description => { :store => :yes } } end I get back the correct results when I do Link.find_by_contents, however, I''d like to highlight them. If I do something like iterate through the list of

Given the following class Programmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assignments has_many :projects, :through => :assignments end if I call Programmer#projects.clear, it will delete_all the joining assignments; however, I have a situation where I''d like the assignments to get destroyed instead so that their after_destroy callbacks get called. It would be simple to

I know ActiveRecord doesn''t support composite primary keys, but I need to use one, and I need it ASAP. I don''t need any composite foreign keys, luckily; what I have is a table that stores old versions of rows in another table, so the composite key is an id + date stamp. Would someone tell me a hack I can use to support this? -- View this message in context:

I got a application like following. A board has many posts All posts belong to a board I try to destroy all the posts under a board when I destroy the board. My destroy function is following. def destroy @board = Board.find(params[:id]) @post = @board.posts @post.destroy @board.destroy respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to(boards_url) } format.xml

Got it all running nicely now for a few days but noticed something funny. I have a table were lots of records get added, deleted every day. I can see the added records being added by AAF to the index but I notices some "ghost" results when doing searches. The search returns record ID-s that do not exist anymore because they were deleted. Does AAF also remove entries from the index when

I have noticed at the dev.rubyonrails.org site that many tickets with pretty clear-cut bug reports/patches or feature enhancements don''t get any attention. They sit there for months at a time. Why is this? Are tickets from those that are not in rails-core deprioritized? Are there just not enough people that have the power to act on tickets? I know it''s not lack of test cases

hi @ all How can I clean all records from a table in a mysql database without delete the table in the database? (only use a method in the model) thanks for helping! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group,

Hi! I got a class named EinsatzFilter which I serialized to session. Before saving to session it works afterwards I keep getting the message: "undefined method `to_s'' for #<Person:0x38c6ab8>". "Person" is a from ActiveRecord::Base inherited class. Code: class EinsatzFilter include ApplicationHelper attr_reader :personen, :monat, :projekte, :kunde

I have a model for a task class. When I try to save a task, for some reason no INSERT statement is being generated. Here''s the pertinent part of the development.log: ------------------------------------ Processing TasksController#create_fromProject (for 70.247.24.238 at 2006-03-08 14:20:30) [POST] Parameters: {"commit"=>"Create",

Greetings. I have a route something like this: map.calendar ''/tasks/:year/:month'', :controller => ''tasks'', :action => ''calendar'', :year => /\d{4}/, :month => /\d{2}/ (Ignore the obvious problems of invalid data.) I''m trying to create a form that will allow my users to navigate from one month/year to the next.

My problem: Mock ''Task_1005'' received unexpected message :user_id= with (1) No matter what I do to try to stub that out it will still fail out and give me that message. Here is my spec describe TasksController, "handling POST /tasks" do before(:each) do @task = mock_model(Task, :to_param => "1", :save => true)

Hi, I was very surprised by difference of delete_all on association vs model(delegated to relation). Given TaskFilter.has_many(:qualifiers, :class_name=>''TaskFilterQualifier'') TaskFilter.delete_all => one DELETE statement Without :dependent option on "qualifiers" association TaskFilter.first.qualifiers.delete_all => SELECT `task_filter_qualifiers`.* FROM

I would like to put Ruby code inside a string, between <%= %> tags, and have the code inside the tags executed when the string is displayed. Is this possible? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.