similar to: which interface to shape for ppoe?

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

I am trying to configure a firewall, but nailing down the configuration is eluding me. The box is running Debian stable. Basically, I have a rackmount server with six network cards. eth0 is the internal network, eth1 is a kiosk network, eth2 is a DMZ/wireless network. On the outbound side, eth3 is a DSL connection and eth4 is a cablemodem connection. What I am trying to do is route all internal

Hi, I have a question conercing wondershaper. I''m using the Clarkconnect linux distribution for my linux router and I tried to use wondershaper. On start up of wshaper, there are no errors or any other problems but I''m not sure if it''s running correctly. Only one qdisc / one class is used and when I start an uplink ftp transfer, my ping time is growing up to 1700ms - I

Thanks for the tips Brian, Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the ethernet interface and cable modems. To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a saw some messages talking about that. One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''s assume there is no

Hi, I''m trying to use Shorewall (3.0.6) to accomplish what I thought was going to be fairly simple. Unfortunately, I can''t get the dmz to work correctly, and I''m getting martians logged against the interface at issue. Any help I could get would be greatly appreciated! A picture of my physical setup is attached. I have also attached a shorewall dump. To make a long

I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I''m uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC="6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901

Hey all, i am fighting with a strange behavior here - i have two systems connected via a direct crosslink wire. After booting, the connection is up and both systems can reach the other one. After a small time window the interface is down. $ dmesg |grep eth4 igb 0000:41:00.2: added PHC on eth4 igb 0000:41:00.2: eth4: (PCIe:5.0Gb/s:Width x4) igb 0000:41:00.2: eth4: PBA No: G13158-000 8021q:

Following my question: I want to limit all uploading coming from eth1, going to the internet, TCP port 333, to 5kbit. (The recipients in the internet receive the data on port 333) What do I have to add to the tcrules/tcstart files? The situation so far: The Linux PC is connected to the Internet with eth0. I have so far copied the contents of the wshaper.htb file (from The Wonder Shaper) to

Hi there! It just occured to me that there is a difference between wshaper and wshaper.htb. In wshaper there is no check on the ACK-bit, all small packages are priorized. Is that the new way to go, or is it a "bug"? Greetings, Nils _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hi, I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb script. I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very* slow (mails with

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

On the wiki it say's that if you use the Goto commands you need to replace ',' with '|' in the app data field. But in the examples it uses '|' in place of ',' in the Dial command also in a couple of places. Is it safe to replace ',' with '|' everywhere in the app data field when using realtime? Or should I still to substituting ','

X101P with Ambient md3200 chip on it, with the zaptel wcfxo driver.... Just an indication of how many people have got this to work would be useful. Cheers Mark.

How "real time" is realtime? If the extensions.conf is stored in the database, does * query it row by row or is it "cached"? In other words, given the following exerpt: exten => 5001,1,Dial(IAX2/test@test/s,30,g) exten => 5001,2,Voicemail(u5001) exten => 5001,102,Voicemail(b5001) exten => 5001,103,Hangup exten => 5002,1,Dial(IAX2/test2@test2/s,30) exten =>

Hello, i´ve installed a Suse 8.1 minimal System with iproute 2.4.7 and iptables, Suse default Kernel 2.4.19. When I start the Wondershaper 1.1a Script I get the following Error: CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 72: allot: command not found CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 78: allot:

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi, Please suppose following config: Two external interfaces for two different providers On each of them configured NAT for specific IP addr. ie. 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 inet 1.1.1.30/30 brd 1.1.1.31 scope global eth2 6: eth4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 inet 2.2.2.66/27 brd 2.2.2.95 scope global eth4 On eth2

Hi all, I tried last week to do traffic shaping on a production system, object of the exercise was simply to throttle the outgoing traffic. tc qdisc add dev eth4 root tbf rate 300mbit burst 300kb latency 50ms But the server became rather instable, crashing repeatedly without anything in the logs. Can anybody spot glaring mistakes in the tc command above, or tell me what I should have done

Hi, Shorewall version -4.0.12-2 (EL5 rpm version) OS : Centos 5.2 I have shorewall successfully running on Linux with multi ISP. Trying to make services such as "rsync, ftp" go through my secondary ISP. For which I did the following eth0 : Internal LAN eth4 : DSL (Second ISP) => x.x eth5 : T1 (First ISP) => y.y Created the following entries in