similar to: Grub error 16

I need to get a new computer and am looking at Intel E6600 Core 2 Duo. I'll be running Centos5. I have a couple of VMware Workstation 6 licenses, is there a way to install and run 64 bit inside an VMware virtual machine? I don't care about performance, it's only for testing and debugging purposes. This is not production. Any suggestion? -- Thanks http://www.sqlhacks.com The

Hi. I have cloned a RHEL 5.6 physical server over to a ESXi 5.0 Virtual Machine. Using a live CD on the new Virtual Machine I created 3 partition /boot (/dev/sda1), / (/dev/sda2) and swap (/dev/sda3), I then mounted the / (sda2) partition and created the /boot directory and mount the boot partition partition /dev/sda1 into /boot. I then used rsync to copy the source machine over to the Virtual

Second question: Take a look at the logs Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 named[2224]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone 58.168.192.in-addr.arpa Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 named[2224]: client 192.168.58.10#22874: update '58.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' denied Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 named[2224]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone 58.168.192.in-addr.arpa Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 dhcpd: Unable to add reverse

Yes I think so This is my /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf ddns-updates on; ddns-update-style interim; #ddns-update-style none; update-static-leases on; option domain-name-servers cd1.home.cu; option domain-name "home.cu"; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; include "/etc/bind/rndc.key"; #include "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; # deny

Now it works and updates the zone like you said But now I get this For windows 7 Apr 22 20:25:45 cd1 named[1704]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone home.cu Apr 22 20:25:45 cd1 named[1704]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of signer=WIN28\$\@HOME.CU name=win28.home.cu type=AAAA error=insufficient access rights Apr 22 20:25:45 cd1 named[1704]: client 192.168.58.80#53235/key WIN28\$\@HOME.CU:

After having compiled samba-4.4.0 and installed bind9 and isc-dhcp-server from Debian repos 8 everything works fine except that no reverse zone updates from DHCP to DNS. I tried the example that comes in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Samba_4_Active_Directory_domain_controller&oldid=427930 This is the error that but I have not managed to solve April 12 16:22:45 cd1 named [848]:

I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are my latest results with these chipsets and Centos 5.1 1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does not

Morning All, I upgraded from 9.2-STABLE to 10.0-PRERELEASE #0 r259144 last night and I am now getting this every 2 seconds in /var/log/messages: Dec 10 07:54:31 Shop kernel: ata1: FAILURE - zero length DMA transfer attempted Dec 10 07:54:31 Shop kernel: ata1: setting up DMA failed cat /var/log/messages | grep ata1: cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0 cd0: <TSSTcorp DVD-ROM TS-H352C

I am using the "predict" function on a support vector machine (svm) object, and I don't understand why I can't predict on a dataset with more observations than the training dataset. I think this problem is a generic "predict" problem, but I'm not sure. The original svm was fit on 50 observations.

Comments? People's opinions -- Thanks http://www.sqlhacks.com The SQL knowledge base

Hello, I'm trying to complete a minimal install of Centos 5.1 x86_64 on a Core 2 Duo 2.2Ghz running on an Asus P5K-VM motherboard - yes, this means it's the G33 chipset. (you can stop laughing now) I'm installing to two SATA-disks setup with Software Raid-1. I've installed an Intel NIC that is detected during install and I'm able to complete the install itself - mind you I

Hi Folks, I've facing an intermittent hang with a USB port which seems cam related: Event's that happen are: o USB modem (HUAWEI E220) plugged into PC ugen3.2: <HUA WEI> at usbus3 u3g0: <3G Modem> on usbus3 u3g0: Found 3 ports. umass0: <USB MASS STORAGE> on usbus3 umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 umass0:6:0:-1: Attached to scbus6 umass1: <USB

I have a 45 x 16 data frame consisting of dissimilarities among 10 colors, giving in each column the 45 = 10*9/2 pairwise judgments for one of 16 subjects. The rownames identify each pair of colors, e.g, "AC" = ("A","C"), and the pairs are ordered by columns in the lower triangle of each distance matrix. > helm.raw <-

> Hi > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Anatol Pomozov > <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I keep trying syslinux on my testing machine with BIOS and btrfs on > > root partition. I use syslinux 6.03pre18, kernel 3.15.4. > > > > A number of btrfs related bugs has been fixed in syslinux 6.03 > > recently, but I still

Been running rock solid servers on Centos 3 and 4 for years but equipment is starting to die so it is time. I was thinking along the lines of an Intel Q6600 on an Asus P5K-VM mobo with the new G33 chipset utilizing SATA. Is anyone having success with this board or any of the G33 chipsets where I am not going to run into all kinds of install problems? I see these other threads of install

Michael Rock napsal(a): > all-generic-ide irqpoll > > Without irqpoll it just hangs and without > all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still > need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. > Michael, > I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's kring fine. For sure > im right now uploading full DVD isos. I did not want to :o( due due to >

Hello, I just rsync'd my 1TB partitions formated with jfs filesystem containing ~720GB data. I saw -3G difference between source and destination which made me suspect possible dataloss. Also I had experienced loss of integrity on my previous copies but I did not find the cause until now. As command line I used following: sh-3.2# rsync --verbose --sparse --append-verify --fuzzy --progress

>I probably shouldn''t have been operating machinery yesterday. >The crash is probably because I committed the e820 memory rearranging >stuff into the wrong branch, but something may have broken us from >tip/master as well. >   J Kernel was already broken at 2/28/09 --- On Sat, 2/28/09, Marc - A. Dahlhaus <mad@wol.de> wrote: From: Marc - A. Dahlhaus

Hi Just wondering why there are two diferent version of file comps #ll iso/mnt-cd1/RedHat/RPMS/comps-3.0.0centos-0.20040916.i386.rpm -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6821992 Sep 16 19:11 iso/mnt-cd1/RedHat/RPMS/comps-3.0.0centos-0.20040916.i386.rpm #ll iso/mnt-cd3/RedHat/RPMS/comps-3.0.0centos-0.20040916.i386.rpm -r--r--r-- 2 root root 6809965 Sep 16 18:52