similar to: no default leaf on HTB

Hi! Here''s what I want: root class 0010 premium parent class 1000 premium child classes 1xyz best-effort parent class 2000 best-effort child classes 2xyz default class 3000 Here''s how I do it: eth1: DEFAULT=3000 eth1-0010.root: RATE=100Mbit LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000.premium CEIL=352Kbit RATE=352Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 CEIL=32Kbit RATE=8Kbit

Dear All, I’m working with Fedora Core 3, kernel 2.9.1, MPLS-for-Linux-4.193, and having some problems when create a HTB queue. ALL packets goes to the default queue, they don’t care about any mark or ip field I use to enqueue them. : -/ That’s the deal, all packets that incoming the interface eth2 are classified and have theirs TOS field changed following some qos policy at the PREROUTING

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

Hello List, Can you please point me to the right resources on making multiple sip phones behind a firewall w/ private address work with asterisk w/c is on a public network. I have seen STUN on the grandstream and Xtunnels on X-lite. What is most deployed by members here with similar setups? Thanks. -- Cheers, Paul P. Pongco

Thank you Andy! I did''t find why I could''t use the fw match in ingress. Now it works. Now I ran into another problem: When I try to add a pfifo_fast leaf qdisc dor htb classes it seg.-faults. Is pfifo_fast a special qdisc? I can succesfully add other type of qdiscs. I found that a similar problem was reported in february on a MIPS architecture. root@zefir:/usr/src# tc qdisc

(list admin, please cancel the same post from my other email address -- forgot to change it on first submission) I need to setup QoS on a linux router/firewall I maintain. I spent 10 hours reading everything I could find on QoS/HTB/iproute2 and came up with what I thought made sense for my situation. So I deployed it and BOOM! KERNEL PANIC! Not what I was expecting... now the debugging begins.

Hi I am current trying to set up a guaranteed minimum rate for the leaf (1:1x). Also would I be correct in saying that the quantum is the dividing rule (so if I keep it the same "1532" and keep all the leafs in "1:1x" prio 3 they should all get the same amount of bandwidth shared across them equally?). For example below would the "rate" in the "1:1x" leaf

Hi, I''ve try to use htb to limit outgoing traffic but it seems that it doesn''t work. I guess the probem is the filter. Here is my script. #!/bin/sh echo "Add root qdisc, default traffic go to 1:30" tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10

Hi, this is a followup to "Problem with HTB and ceil", the problem with the ceiling has been resolved, thanks to the memebers on this m/g. Now I have the problem that packets get into the correct classe with the correct marks but the prios are not respected. I have 4 different classes: 1. voip class / prio 0 / mark 100 / voip traffic 2. ACK class / prio 1 / mark 200 / ACK packets to

Hey all. I''m trying to set up QoS using the HTB qdisc in a very basic setup, but it the example shown in the howto doesn''t seem to be working. While the packets show up in the correct classes, they appear to be completely ignoring the rates, meaning nothing gets shaped. My setup is that I''ve got a a bunch of machines behind my firewall/router: 1.2.3.1

Hi, Is it possible to attach another qdisq under a HFSC classfull ? I try it and the configuraton works : $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 30 $TC class add dev $dev parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc rate ${RATE}mbit ul rate ${RATE}mbit $TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:10 hfsc rt umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 200kbit $TC class add dev $dev

Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic on the network doesn''t sink all of the

Hi,All I use HTB to control traffic.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root /usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev nas0 root handle 1:0 htb default 60 /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb ceil 896kbit rate 896kbit prio 0 burst 60k /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb ceil 896kbit rate 537kbit prio 1 burst 60k /usr/sbin/tc class add dev

I have a network with around 40 /24 subnets that shares a common DSL, this cries out for shaping so here I am trying to make it work as my first tc project. I have managed to cargocult some snippets from this list and tried to come up with a config, but there are a few things that I''d really like some input on: 1) Are the NAT''ed addresses available in the PREROUTING table

Hi! I''m using 2.4.17 + htb2_2.4.16.diff now. But I found the tc class show command won''t show the correct infomation like before... I got something like: # tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: class htb 1: parent 1: # tc -s qdisc

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

Yes sure here they are: The first one that i have received 2day and does not work almost at all: #!/bin/bash ETH_IN="eth1" ETH_OUT="eth0" BANDA_TOTALA="2Mbit" # pentru neclasificati ar trebui sa fie banda minima - 1k - aici ar trebui sa ajunga trafic necunoscut, # care nu e organizat in shape-uri BANDA_NECLASIFICATI="8kbit" #Shape generale /sbin/tc

Hello, I have problems with htb. The problem is that when I download any file via shaper with htb, the traffic is very dinamic, it jumps, for example: if i have set ceil = 128kbit the results that it jumps from 112kbps to 144kbps or smth like that maybe its not very bad, but when the traffic drops down to 40kbps or less and then after 1 or 2 seconds jumps to 144kbps, its bad :-( and it is often.

Hi! I have just started with traffic shaping, and after hours of reading websites, man pages asf. I am still stumped at one problem I have. The interface eth0 is attached to the outside world, and I have an openvpn tunnel to another part of the organization using eth0 and port 5001. The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top priority and the rest share