similar to: HTB and IMQ and combining ingress/egress

I am successfully running ingress (IMQ) and egress (HTB) shaping on a bridge. Is there any way to combine and share the bandwidth between ingress and egress? Example: I have set up www service for egress at 128 KB and ingress at 256 KB. The shaping on them works fine separately. However, I want to create a single virtual pipe for www traffic and limit both ingress and egress combined to 256 KB.

I have two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 but i can''t discern the egress traffic than ingress traffic. I need to apply htb qdisc in both directions, and I read that I need the IMQ patch to do this, because in ingress qdisc i can''t apply htb qdisc...but where is the ingress qdisc? affect the traffic that goes from eth0 to eth1 or is for the traffic that goes from eth1 to eth0?

hi all. i really need help. i need a working example on shaping the ingress per user using tcng without IMQon a mechine which has two interfaces, and acts like a firewall, and NAT for intrenet connection sharing: eth0 is the external facing the Internet. eth1 is the internal towards my LAN/office network. Please i dont want other than tcng code. iptables code i read on some pages seems

Todays quick question: Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress, and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be better than using imq? -- Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

Hello people, This the first time i post in list. I read the lartc how-to and decided that IMQ with HTB was the solution to solve my problem. The ingress shaping i want is simple, shape the traffic to my ftp-server, i just want to give 8kbps to each client because they only upload to my ftp-server, and i dont want to any class borrowing, each client only send(upload) at 8kbps, not above this

Hello, Some time ago I''ve read somewhere that local traffic in IMQ could hung up the whole system but it was corrected long time ago. So I was very surprised yesterday when it occurred not true. While testing IMQ I''ve observed for some time that - if you tag some local traffic with iptables both in pre- and postrouting - kernel is hunging up. It is happening quite quick with

>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:

i''m trying to limit my egress bandwidth over 2 interfaces (eth1 and eth2) to 2 Mbit my script is something like this: tc=/sbin/ip ipt=/sbin/iptables $tc class add dev imq0 parent 2: classid 2:4 htb rate 1845Kbit quantum 3000 $tc filter add dev imq0 parent 2: protocol ip handle 4 fw classid 2:4 $tc class add dev imq0 parent 2:4 classid 2:40 htb rate 0.5Mbit quantum 3000 prio 5 $tc qdisc

Hi all, I manage somo interface in output. I know that i can send packet to the single interface using routing tables. I use IMQ to shape ingress traffic but why i would have to use IMQ on postrouting? When IMQ, on egress, give me advantages? and what are this advantages? Thanks Bye Simone -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Clicca qui:

I am attempting to implement IMQ on a 2.4.31 version kernel with iptables 1.3.3. I am following the example at http://www.linuximq.net/usage.html. When I enter the line iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j IMQ --todev1 (eth1 is the external interface), the computer slows to a crawl. OK, the CPU is only an AMD K6 233 which is not the world''s greatest CPU, but egress shaping is

Hi Guys, Here is a question that is probably of concern to many of us. I am under pressure to provide some solution for ingress traffic shaping. What my customer demands is to divide the downstream (ingress) of an ADSL lines to two classes of traffic - important traffic and non important downloads. He has a very reasonable requirement: he wants a guarantee of at least 1000kbps at all times for

When I try to put all incoming traffic to IMQ on PREROUTING I can''t discern traffic to LAN and traffic to server. When I try to put only INPUT traffic to IMQ... I can''t discern traffic from LAN and from internet. Help me plizz to put all incoming traffic to one IMQ device and all outcoming to other IMQ device and (it''s very important) discern traffic to clients and

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

Hello there, Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ? I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple bandwidth limmiting, and it works. I''ve read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but couldn''t make myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for ingress policing ...

I''ve followed this list for quite a long time and have even posted a couple of times. I used the early versions of IMQ from Devik (I think that was his name), and it worked well. I only ever got the chance to implement it in my test environment. I now need to implement it in my production environment. My Linux core router has nine interfaces and has a 27 megabit connection to the

Hello, I have eth0 - internet eth1..4 - local networks on eth0 i do $IPTABLES -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE I want to balance out/in load for eth1..4 and localhost (mainly squid). Nat makes impossible to do it on eth0, so I installed IMQ. I need to get to on imq0 unnnated in/out traffic that I could make priorities for protocols and networks. Do somthing like this: prate=1Mbit

ive got such network: |--------| |-------------| | WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| ------ NATED LAN |--------| |-------------| I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ?? --