similar to: ambiguous nested conditions on find

Dear Wu Gong and Peter Ehlers, thank you very much for your help debugging my script. Now I have a general following up question: Is there a straightforward way to rearrange the following dataset so that all first letters of each column will be combined in one column, all the second letters in a second column, all the third ones in a third column and so on, resulting in 7 columns, i.e. for

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

I've the following error : Doing a node status request to the domain master browser at IP aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd failed First time I configure my smb.conf file on a server with the adress aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd For some raison I have to change this address for another. When I restart samba I the message : nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:get_domain_master_name_node_status_fail(486)

Thanks for the previous tips and suggestions. Here's a more concise example: Input file: <aaaa> <bbbb> <cccc> <dddd> I want everything on one line, i.e., remove all newlines. Like so: <aaaa><bbbb><cccc><dddd> Simple perl code: #!/usr/bin/env perl # Remove newlines from a file in two ways: # (1) Just "chomp" them; # (2) Replace

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

Dear friends, How do I stop partial matching of list names? e.g., x <- list(AAAA="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") is.null(x$A) #returns FALSE even though there is no element A. if(is.null(x$A)) {result <- x$BBBB} else {result <- x$A} result #is aaaa even though there is no x$A element x <- list(CCCC="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") if(is.null(x$A))

hi, I''m creating a custom form_builder and i''m trying to figure out how would helpers like text_field know if the field has an error message so I can highlight it and show the message text thanks linoj --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To

Dear all, I have a lot of problems on R-programming. for example my csv. file is .. Date wrfRH wrfsolar wrfwindspeed wrfrain wrftd wrfta 21/10/2010 92.97 22.11 53.27 0 1546.337861 61.00852664 22/10/2010 87.35 21.99 40.89 0 1300.408288 62.85352227 23/10/2010 88.38 21.71 28.04 0.01 1381.768284 54.80594493 24/10/2010 92.32 15.45 22.38 0.51 1113.90981 39.46573663 25/10/2010 93.42

Hi! I need some help to finish my script. I have two tables that I combine randomly to produce a third table. This I do for hundreds of iterations. In the output file I get all the simulated tables after each other. It looks like this (in this case 3 iterations): output file: [[1]] [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] "GM030005" "WI920024" "CCCC" [2,]

hi, lets say routes.rb has map.resources :foo and I want the show action to have a diffent url, so I add (after the above line) map.foo ''/bar/:id'', :controller => ''foo'', :action => ''show'' this works fine, including foo_path( :id => "1") => /bar/1 and <%= link_to ''Show'', foo %>

Hi, My helper specs were going ok until I added a call to a rails DateHelper method in one of my helpers http://api.rubyonrails.com/classes/ActionView/Helpers/ DateHelper.html#M000574 The helper runs fine from my view templates, just dies in the spec test. I boiled my question down to a simple (not too useful) example. I''m not sure what I''m missing. #

I have already a linux PDC with LDAP-Samba 3.3. Now i want to install BDC which will work if my PDC goes down. Pleases help me out. Thanks kamal

Hi, When I tested xm new command without uuid parameter repeatedly, I saw many same managed domain as follows. # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 941 2 r----- 51.9 # xm new /xen/vm1.conf Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". # xm new /xen/vm1.conf Using config file

fyi, I just posted this http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/Running_rspec_after_you_deploy - linoj

hi, When I run rake spec , it seems to be starting with my default environment (development or production) and connects to that database, before actually connecting to the test one and proceeding with the tests. When I remove the development database, the specs wont run. How do i initiate rspec to be test environment from the start? I dont see this when i run using script/spec linoj

Hi, has anyone here written a capistrano task for rspec to run through my specs on the deployed server? I''d appreciate a snippet or two to get me started. Thx linoj

Hi, I''m trying the specs for restful_authentication I found here http://jonathan.tron.name/articles/2007/01/02/rspec-on-rails-restful- authentication It seems to use custom .should methods: should_eql, should_be_an_instance_of, should_redirect_to, should_be_success, should_not_be_nil, should_be_nil, should_not_be_nil, should_be_empty, should_be_success, should_not_change, and

hi, When running rails spec tests is there a log file generated? i''m looking for generated sql to help me debug like in development.log or is there a way to run the test against a webrick server so i can see logs? (i''m not running with spec_server at the moment, it doesnt seem to work well with autotest) thanks linoj

I am trying to collect enough information about an problem a client is having with its asterisk 11.17.0 x86_64. This issue was observed before in 1.8.20, and we upgraded to 11.15.0 and then to 11.17.0 with no solution. Background: this client is a telemarketing call-center that generates outgoing calls with close to a hundred agents operating simultaneously in peak hours. The system uses

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:26:54PM +0000, Martin wrote: > I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not > route smaller segments than /48 > If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get > network unreachable > However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine > > Is this is a limitation in