similar to: Abysmal Rails and Ruby 1.8.6_p287 performance on x86_64 Linux

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7854 Summary: Abysmal sparse file performance Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: grarpamp at gmail.com

I'm experiencing extremely slow performance when trying to copy files from and to a samba 4 share. I'm using Debian and the Samba 4 SerNet packages and everything is up to date on the client as well as on the server. The connection is made through 100Mbp/s ethernet, but the problem also exists on a local virtual machine that runs on the Debian server. By extremely I mean really abysmal:

I am working on building a facter tag based node classifier similar to https://github.com/jordansissel/puppet-examples/tree/master/nodeless-puppet/. However, I have run into an issue where I cannot use puppet''s require file ability to push the yaml file containing the facts file to the client because it would require two runs of puppet to pickup changes. Consequently, I have written into

Hi all. I'm using Wine ( 1.1.4 ) to test some Flash stuff ( flex ) in IE6. IE6 runs quite well normally, but once Flash is loaded up, it goes VERY slowly indeed. I've done a quick sysprof profile ( http://entropy.homelinux.org/ie6_flash.sysprof ), and from what I can see ( and I'm most certainly no expert ), it looks like most CPU cycles are being burned in fbGetImage and fbCopyArea

I am running Win 98 SE and have a Samba server v2.0.5 on a FreeBSD 3.3 system. Both machines sit on the same 100baseTX subnet. I am seeing expected read performance, but writes from Win98 to the Samba share are terrible; upwards of 30 seconds to copy a 900kb file (yes, that's kb). This happens in both Explorer, the DOS "shell", and in the application that actually created the file

I have a 5.5GB file, mostly sparse. Tar performs far[!] better than rsync. I have no ideas yet, so just an FYI as to current state. FreeBSD 8.1 i386 zfs Yes, I know the blocks used differs but don't know why yet, could be just how zfs does things or related to the large amount of sparseness. There are no media errors, CPU/IO load or anything like that and the source and dest paths are on the

I've been trying to open up multiple instances of WoW under Wine for a while now... I can get two copies open at once without a problem, but I run into issues when I try to open a third. Some background: I'm running each one from a separate install, not trying to open them all from the same folder. I'm using Wine 1.1.2, and the latest binary nVidia drivers (173.14.12). I've

I''m making a web site with charts, I''m using "XML/SWF Charts", the problem that I have is that the charts work perfectly when I''m working locally, but when I load all files to the server and I want to see the charts, the browser shows me the next message: This page requires AC_RunActiveContent.js. Does anyone to know the reason and how can I solve?

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:03:21PM -0700, W Kern wrote: >Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we >threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling. > >Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an >older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file >I got a core2duo when it should have been

I THINK YOUR A VERY SAD BUNCH OF LIFES WAISTERS On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:00 PM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ? ?https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > or, via email, send a message with subject or body

Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling. Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file I got a core2duo when it should have been at least Penryn or something (Xeon E5345) Of course the VMs work fine with

you can set the CPU type and model and features https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html I usually give it during the virt-install as -cpu core2duo,+vmx (the ,+vmx will enable vmx vt extensions on the guest CPU ) ... <cpu match='exact'> <model fallback='allow'>core2duo</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <topology sockets='1'

I have been challenged by someone that opusfile's 48kHz most of the time forced resampling but I didn't have good arguments to counter. I've checked the opus-codec.org pages and Monty's pages without finding good arguments. If you encode files to .opus with opusenc and decode with opusfile's api the sampling rate is constantly 48kHz ignoring output hardware isn't it? Is

I try to assign 8 host cores to Windows 2003 Server Standard guest. Because this OS version has a limit of 4 sockets, I have to change the CPU topology. My guest definition: <vcpu>8</vcpu> <cpu match='minimum'> <model>core2duo</model> <topology sockets='4' cores='1' threads='2'/> </cpu> doesn't

HI, Does the mysql in centos compiled with multi processor support? i have a mysql in centos 5 running in a core2duo processor and it seems that it only uses 1 processor. -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano Blog | http://mark.quitoriano.org VicidialNOW! | http://www.vicidialnow.com APUG! | http://asterisk.org.ph

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington >> <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> Hi all- >>>>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington >> <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> Hi all- >>>>

On 09/19/2014 05:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/19/2014 01:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> However, it sounds to me that at least for KVM, it is very easy just to emulate the RDRAND instruction. The hypervisor would report to the guest that RDRAND is supported in CPUID and the emulate the instruction when guest executes it. KVM already traps guest #UD (which would

On 09/19/2014 05:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/19/2014 01:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> However, it sounds to me that at least for KVM, it is very easy just to emulate the RDRAND instruction. The hypervisor would report to the guest that RDRAND is supported in CPUID and the emulate the instruction when guest executes it. KVM already traps guest #UD (which would

Not as smooth an experience as I had assumed it would be after a test run with a clean install worked perfectly. So figured I would share the experience in case anybody else runs into similar situation since not all information are consolidated in a single place. Physical machine in question is a 4yr W2008R2 server (non-raided!) running custom app from defunct developer which is why I am