similar to: aasm callback order?

So I''m happy to see that ActionMailer supports layouts now (it may have for a while, but I just now realized it). But I don''t see a way to turn them off selectively or by multipart type. For example, if I have a layout that''s really simple in "layouts/ email.html.erb": <div style="border:1px solid gray"> <%= yield %> </div> I

I''m sending plain text and html emails by having multiple files for each email I send. For example, for my registration email I have a registration.text.plain.erb file and a registration.text.html.erb file. I want to use a layout for the html version of my emails. In my mailer I put: class AccountsMailer < ActionMailer::Base layout ''email'' ... end

There''s got to be an easier way... I am building an event manager and as part of it, the user selects the time zone of the event from a drop-down list using the time_zone_select helper. This is stored in the events table as a string. Because of legacy data which is stored in UTC, I want to keep the dates and times in the table as UTC but when I display it, I want to show the abbreviated

Acts_as_soft_deletable is a rails plugin that provides the ability to soft delete or disable models. When models are destroyed, they will be archived so that they can later be restored easily. Its similar to acts_as_paranoid but uses a different approach that should make it a little more foolproof. See the README at the following url for a better description. github url:

Hi all: For example I have: class Color < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :ball end class Ball < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :colors end What I want to do is to write a method that: 1. takes the result of Ball#colors, which is an array of Color objects 2. do something with the array 3. return the result but I want to name my method Ball#colors, i.e. I want to overload the generated

Considering an object with several has_many :through => associations, what is the ''best'' way to handle validations? As an example: class Student < ActiveRecord::Base # some attrbutes like # :name # :grade # relationships has_many :students_assignment, :dependent => :destroy has_many :assignments, :through => :students_assignment has_many

We''re developing a system that''s used for tracking company IPO data and we''re running into a few number storage issues. For large numbers, i.e. numbers greater than 100 million, MySQL insists on storing these as scientific notation. I don''t really have a problem with that but when we want to edit these fields using something like: <% form_for(@company) do

Is there a way to manage the states in AASM by keeping them in a table to normalize the data? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi all, I''m trying to link to the "Next Entry >>" from the current entry page (in show.html.erb). Any one know how I would do it? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send

I started talking this one up yesterday - I''ve gotten as close to a good problem statement as I can. 1) script/about: Ruby version 1.9.1 (powerpc-darwin9.6.0) RubyGems version 1.3.1 Rails version 2.3.0 Active Record version 2.3.0 Action Pack version 2.3.0 Active Resource version 2.3.0 Action Mailer version 2.3.0 Active Support version

Hello there, I''m using AASM to manage states in my User model. I want to change the status through the edit action. To do this I''m using the method User.aasm_states_for_select in my form to populate the select input for states. When I hit the button commit all the changes are saved, including the state name. But the AASM event for that state is not called, it is happening

Hi, I''m announcing Hirb, a mini view framework which enables script/ console to provide custom views. Out of the box your activerecord objects come back as ascii tables. You can also configure your tree-based models to return as ascii trees: Numeric |-- Float |-- Integer | |-- Bignum | `-- Fixnum |-- Date::Infinity `-- Rational I''ve written two tutorials on

Hi After having updated some GEMS I get `load_missing_constant'': uninitialized constant ActiveSupport::Cache (NameError) on starting the server of a freshly generated rails project. Before, I already had Rails 2.3.2 projects succesfully running, now all of them generate this error. These are my GEMS: actionmailer (2.3.2, 2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.1, 2.1.0) actionpack (2.3.2, 2.2.2, 2.1.2,

I am very confused by the config.gem statement in 2.1 If I put config.gem ''pdf-writer'' in my environment.rb I get the following error when I try to instanciate a PDF object in my controller with the statement pdf = PDF::Writer.new uninitialized constant CollectionsController::PDF so I try putting require ''pdf/writer'' in my environment.rb and the application

I have a situation in which I want to validate a number is not zero. Both positive and negative values are acceptable, just not zero. validates_numericality_of has an :equal_to attribute, but I don''t see a :not_equal_to. I have not yet been able to find anyone who has discussed this. I did find information about custom validators, so I am now using a custom validator to check the field

when i run * rake db:create* * * WARNING: ''require ''rake/rdoctask'''' is deprecated. Please use ''require ''rdoc/task'' (in RDoc 2.4.2+)'' instead. at /home/vishnu/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p352-D9TI4Ms3gBgeRYYz77F+sQ@public.gmane.org/gems/rake-0.9.2.2/lib/rake/rdoctask.rb DEPRECATION WARNING: Rake tasks in

Tim, Would you mind giving me a more specific example of the sort of document that you think this should look like? I'd like to write up something that is somewhat final. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Michael Graczyk <mgraczyk at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry > <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > As a general point,

I''m adding some code to a project using restful_authentication and acts_as_statemachine In the create method for a user there is the following code generated by the restful_authentication template @user.regster! if user.valid? And this will save and the user record if it is valid. I understand that the statemachine will then change the state from passive to pending. It will guard

I have a prod site that has: has_many :data, :conditions => {:aasm => ''active'') I do not want to modify it as I do not want to break existing functionality Is there a way to overrride this at runtime? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

I know in the model we can add validations. But how about if I need different validations depending on the controller. For example... 1) if the User is being created from the accounts controller, I want to REQUIRE the username be entered. 2) if the User is being created from the users controller, I want to NOT REQUIRE the username. validates_presence_of :username, :on => :create requires the