similar to: How to force a lock_version increment

Shouldn''t update_all be updating lock_version? As you can see from my console session below, it is upating the record (changed running attribute to true and returned 1 to show 1 recored was updated). But it did not increment lock_version. And optimistic locking is working correctly otherwise. As you can see below, lock version = 562 before and after the update_all call but it is

In part of my application I''m using dynamic tables. I''m aware of the single thread conditions. I''ve tackled some caveats yet - will post a blog about it soon - but there''s one I need help with. Consider 2 models that are associated: Order and OrderLine where Order has many order_lines. Now we set the table names for them:

Hi, Is there a way to tell Rails that the magic field name for optimistic database locking is not lock_version? I have a legacy database where the optimistic locking field is named "version". Thanks, Phil -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Noob Question 31,265,232 if I''m searching on an object, say order, that has many "order_lines" and I want to display order lines by Quantity ( an attribute of the order_lines ) descending how could I do that without having to do a find() with :order, but something like; Order.order_lines.each do |ol| <!-- code to diplay the line --> how can I determine the field

Hi, I''ve added a custom library called lib\AccountSystem like so: "module AccountSystem SINGLE = 1 MULTIPLE = 2 class << self attr_accessor :account_system_type end end" Now I wanna configure AccountSystem.account_system_type=AccountSystem::SINGLE in one app. I used an initializer: config/initializers/account_initialization.rb where I put this line in. I

Hello. The acts_as_versioned plugin works fine ... till the adjunction of optimistic locking via the lock_version table column. Here is the problem description: Without optimistic locking things are fine: # ++++ The table creation migration ++++ % cat db/migrate/001_create_tables.rb class CreateTables < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :softwares,

If I have an exception while trying to save an object, how can I tell Rails that it''s not saved yet? The object has a lock_version (used for optimistic locking). This is what I do: ins = MyClass.new( arguments ) begin transaction do ins.save! bunch_of_other_stuff() end rescue ins.save! # problem here! end The object''s save() sets the internal object state in a saved

Hello People, I have a possibly very lame question. I am fairly new to RoR, and I want to make sure I do it "right". I have a model called Invoice, and one called InvoiceLines. Usual story: the table "invoice" has a 1:n relationship with "invoice_lines", which includes invoice_id. Now... the application will have a "new order" button, which will allow

I have the following validation on and ''Order'' model: validates_presence_of :order_lines, :message => ''missing one or more products.'', :on => :save Ok, great. An order has to have products. Ok. Problem is, there are some old orders that don''t have lines (don''t ask) and in the admin tool we need to be able to work on these orders.

I''m working on an app that makes use of rails'' optimistic locking feature and seeing some possibilities for improvements. It seems a bit tedious to have to add :lock_version to forms wherever the model is used. You also have to "hack" around rails'' UJS feature to add it as a URL parameter when using remote: true, method: [:put, :patch, :post, :delete].

Hi, I''m having great fun developing with Rails but I''ve come to a problem that I can''t quite figure out. I have an Order object that "has_many" order_lines. This works perfectly and I can see all the lines. The OrderLine object has an order_id field as well as product_id and amount. Now ideally I would want to do : order.orderline[0].product.name for

Perhaps this is a Rails issue. However, I need to first determine whether I simply am missing something about updating members of an array. I have an array of 10 ActiveRecord objects. I wish to iterate over the array and update an attribute. When I do this the underlying table row changes but the object in the array frequently does not. For example: count = 0 current_entries.each do

Hi.. Guys new plugin again Foreign Key Associations is a plugin that automatically creates associations based on foreign-keys. The associations are created at runtime-ie. as your ActiveRecord models are loaded-so they will always be up-to-date. For example, given a foreign-key from a customer_id column in an orders table to an id column in a customers table, the plugin creates:

Hey Guys, need a hand again.... Lets say I have an Order... and an Order has Order Lines and Order_Lines have Items... I want to create a New Order, which would have New Order Lines with the same Items... Is there a fast / easy way to do this, w/o having to create a new order, loop through all the order lines, and create them associating them with the Items? Any help would be great, thanks --

Hi all I have a Model like this: class Member < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :username, :email, :first_name, :last_name end I have created a scaffold using script/generate scaffold member members Using the URL localhost:3000/members/edit/1 I can edit all attributes, including created_at, lock_version etc.! But it should only show the attributes I listed in attr_accessible! What

I am currently experiencing concurrency issues after moving from MySQL to SQLite. My original program worked fined using MySQL but is now returning "SQLite3::BusyException" errors. The same result happens whether or not I enable the allow_concurrency flag. If I do manually acquire a lock on the SQLite DB the problem would disapear, but I thought that rails was supposed to handle this

Hi All, I''m having some trouble deciding when and how to implement optimistic locking. Let''s say I have a multiuser Rails app, and let''s say it stores, among other things "vital" customer information. The standard methods created by the Rails generate scaffold script look like this: def edit @customer = Customer.find(params[:id]) end

All, I''ve written a simple job/opportunity tracking database app via RoR. I have about 10 internal users. Sometimes 2 people will want to update the same record at more or less the same time and they collide. In particular user 1 may edit a record, then get distracted, and finally an hour later they click save. During that hour user 2 may have pulled up the record, edited it, and

hi, i have this problem where in i''m able to upload the images using file_column to the server but i''m not able to view the images.i''m not able to see the images but then i''m able to view the image name when i click on my show action. can any one please help?? THIS IS MY LOG as to what happens when i do the image upload. Processing UploadController#create

My first stab at the whole metaprogramming / DSL thing. Fun stuff. Includes unit tests, fixtures, etc, etc. Tested against Oracle and PostgreSQL so far. I''d appreciate it if some MySQL folks could try it out. Hopefully I got the MySQL CREATE TABLE syntax correct. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3402 Assuming this kind of thing is OK, I''d like to make