similar to: https problems

Hi All, I have centos 7. Apache and php are installed. CGI runs fine - php does not seem to run. I have the /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf file php.conf # # Cause the PHP interpreter to handle files with a .php extension. # <FilesMatch \.php$> SetHandler application/x-httpd-php </FilesMatch> # # Allow php to handle Multiviews # AddType text/html .php # # Add index.php to the list of

Morning all, I am finally moving some old (F9 thru F17) servers to C7 (Plus PHP7/Pgsql10) boxes. On the old boxes they all had it set so that .htm and .html files were handled by PHP in addition to the normal .php files. This was done with the simple change to: AddHandler php5-script .php .htm .html AddType text/html .php .htm .html in /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.inc. I did the same on my first

a recent post on bugtraq hilighted an issue with how upstream has configured apache to invoke php, namely using addhandler, which has the behavior of matching the extension anywhere in the file. this means that foo.php.jpg will be run as php. where this becomes an issue is web apps that allow uploads into the webspace for images, pdfs, etc. if the app assumes that anything.jpg is safe,

Basically, the way puppet installs things things with /usr/bin/apt-get -q -y -o DPkg::Options::=--force-confold install <package_name> fails due to authentication WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated But if I do it from an ssh console normally, using apt-get install <package_name> it works fine without issues. Is there a way to change how puppet uses the

Hi All I am just adding some basic e-mail notices to my Rails app using ActionMailer, and have one small issue. I want to provide a confirmation URL to users who sign up for an account. I can obviously just hardcode the URL and append the confirmation code to it, but I''d much rather be able to use something like: url_for(:controller => ''authentication'', :action

Me: not experienced with Rails or Ruby, Problem: Ubuntu 9.04 server in my shop ...couldn''t get Apache2.2 + Passenger + Rails to work for Redmine. (No answer at Redmine list and I don''t think its their problem anyway). Also couldn''t get Apache2.2 and just Rails to work, though some people said it would. Webrick works. Goal: run Redmine on a server that also runs PHP

Hi all, I''ve been spending quite a lot of time trying to install a decent RoR server on my dedicated server (Ubuntu 6.06 LTS), and now, everything works. However, the performances are not really what I had expected... I would like to know what you think about it. Here is my config: 2GHz VIA proc, 1Gb RAM, SATA-II HD. I have apt-got ruby 1.8.4, mysql5 and installed rails 1.1.4 by

Happy Holidays, I am new to RoR and have just run through the install, which well seemed to be vaquely documented as some ''Do this'' type of thing on the http://rubyonrails.org/download page. download gem setup.rb gem install rails rails path/to/your/new/application cd path/to/your/new/application ruby script/server and then ( drumroll ) .... Follow the instructions on

I just moved from apache2/fcgi to apache2.2/mongrel and everything seems to work great except for 2 issues, one being major and one minor. the major issue i am experiencing is that after a period of time where my rails apps are not used, typically overnight, the mongrel processes become unresponsive. I currently have 3 apps running behind an apache2.2 proxy. every morning when i come in to

Hi. I''m using Apache2.2 built from source + mod-proxy + ssl + svn. Everything works fine but I''m sure you I could disable a ton of modules during the build process and in httpd.conf to speed things up and run a tighter memory footprint. Has anyone bothered building Apache2.2 from source disabling all the unneeded modules. I am planning on going through the Apache docs but I

Hi- We just finished our app and I tested for performance with httperf. Our setup is browser -> apache2.2-> mod_poxy balancer-> mongrel cluster -> 3 mongrel servers. I have noticed that the total request per second is is about 7.5. When I increase the no of mongrel to 5, it inches up to 8 req/s. My question is how bad or good this number is? We are on a old dell 2400 machine

Gang- We are getting ready to launch our ROR application; the last item remaining is the deployment platform. For testing, we had used Apache + MOD_FastCGI. I am not that impressed with it; sometimes it has strange effects. For example, when we start the application, for about 5 minutes or so, the app is very unstable and it gets better over time. My questions is .. should I go with (1)

Our group has several web apps developed in ColdFusion, PHP, and Rails. The ColdFusion and PHP apps are on an older server, and the Rails apps on a new server. Ideally, we''d like them all to share the same server. Our current setup for the Rails server is Apache2.2 with mod_proxy_balancer and mongrel_cluster. We''d like to have specific directories be processed and served by

Hi everyone, Recently, I''ve been reading about different deployment environments for rails and mongrel. One configuration I''ve started seeing is apache -> pen -> mongrel cluster. See http://errtheblog.com/post/35 as an example. Can someone explain to me the benefit of using Apache and Pen as opposed to either using apache as a load balancer or pen by itself?

I see that the RubyOnRails.com site has migrated to Mongrel with Apache as a front-end proxy. Is that now the/a recommended setup for Rails apps? We''re still using FCGI but I''m always interested to learn more about other folk''s successful deployment choices. Across all of our sites we''re pumping out about 300k pages per day so anything that saves memory or has

Scenario: Windows Vista - Rails 3.0.3 - Rub(ies)1.9.2-p136 & 1.8.7p330 - MySQL5.5 - Apache2.2 - git/cygwin -everything setup and working, BUT WEBrick is becoming temperamental. I want to run Rails on Apache. Is it possible? What should I do. I made some simple tests like build applications with Ruby 1.9.2 and after with 1.8.7. Rails on WEBrick set the tables and makes the models/ migrations

I am using Apache2.2 + Mongrel on my machine. Now I am accessing it over LAN. When I enter http://mymachinename/myapp it opens fine but when I click on any link in my rails app, it replaces mymachinename with localhost (http://localhost/myapp/controller/action) and thus I am unable to access it from remote location.

Fellow Rail users and developers, Right now the easiest way to run Rails is in combination with Mongrel. However, it may not be a good idea to expose Mongrel directly to the outside world in a high-load production environment. In-addition, Mongrel_cluster + proxy + load balancer have to be used even for a single server deployment making the unified setup more complicated than needs be.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: new_notes Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5801 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060723/34e20e45/new_notes.obj

Hi! I would like to appologize first if this is the wrong place to post this. I have been studying ruby on rails for a couple of days now. And I have this problem on accessing a site. The error on the production.log is ActionController::RoutingError (no route found to match "/" with {:method=>:get}): I have mongrel_rails behind apache2.2. I also have another site which works fine