similar to: rails -1.2.3 to 2.1.1 ? how ?

i have rails-2.1.0 my database.yml development: adapter: oracle database: pe username: or password: or >rake db:create >rake db:version --->Current version: 0 >rake db:migrate rake aborted! ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified (See full trace by running task with --trace) is above idea is possible, then how ? and i thing i should give service

what is Driver & what is Adapter ? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

i create a new model(User) and create a new record (User.create(attributes)) in oracle when i check User.find 1 in console it gives record not found error when i try User.find(:first).id --> 10000 how to change this starting id into 1 .... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

hey all, i need to create a good & attractive Rails-2.1.1 Demo presentation(with the full working flow) what are the main features should be concluded in presentation ? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this

just now i installed ruby 1.9 and rails 2.0.2 on it when i create new rails application username-hO7X3CQjxafZmfiEtUfXeA@public.gmane.org:~/project$ rails app can''t convert Enumerable::Enumerator into Array username-hO7X3CQjxafZmfiEtUfXeA@public.gmane.org:~/project$ how to solve it ? or did i make any mistake in installation process? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

hallo, everyone can anybody help me? i did add my code under ENGINES as a module in a project. before the change , all worked . and the differenz between both is only about application''s environment, before is Ruby version 1.8.6 (i486-linux) RubyGems version 1.1.1 Rails version 2.0.2 Active Record version 2.0.2 Action Pack version 2.0.2

Hi Tobias, could we use information about memory accesses of a SCoP statement and def-use chains to determine statements, which don’t contain matrix multiplication of the following form? for (int i = 0; i < Upper Bound1; i++) for (int j = 0; j < Upper Bound2; j++) for (int k = 0; k < Upper Bound3; j++) C[i][j] += A[i][k] * B[k][j] We could probably check that memory access

On 05/17/2016 01:47 PM, Michael Kruse wrote: > 2016-05-16 19:52 GMT+02:00 Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com>: >> Hi Tobias, >> >> could we use information about memory accesses of a SCoP statement and >> def-use chains to determine statements, which don’t contain matrix >> multiplication of the following form? > > Assuming s/don't/do you want

Hi there, a friend just notified my of the the cover story of "freeX 1'2004": Linux als Telefonanalage (engl.: Linux as PBX) http://www.cul.de/freex.html Cheers, Philipp

Dear all, I would like to submit an issue that we are facing. Indeed, in our environment, we are optimizing the R code to speed up some mathematical calculations as matrix products using the INTEL libraries ( MKL) ( https://software.intel.com/en-us/mkl ) With the last version of the MKL libraries Intel 2018, we are facing to an issue with *all INTERNAL command* that are executing in R.

Hi all, It seems that Polly's code generation can leads to high compile-time overhead, especially for PolyBench applications such as 2mm, 3mm, gemm, syrk, etc. Some basic evaluation and analysis for Polly's code generation can be referred to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16898. Currently, we can choose to run -polly-code-generator=cloog or -polly-code-generator=isl for code

At 2013-08-12 01:18:30,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 08/10/2013 06:59 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have evaluated Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981).  Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. > >Hi Star Tan, > >thanks for the update. >

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:44:45 +0100, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev wrote: <snip> > * How stable/fast/… is Polly today > * We build all of AOSP with rather restrictive compile-time limits > * Bootstrapping time of clang is regressed by 6% (at most) > * Removal of scalar dependences is today very generic and must be > sped up in the future > * Polly still

[add subject] Dear LLVM community, hope all of you had a good start into 2018 and a quiet branching of LLVM 6.0. With the latest LLVM release out of the way and a longer development phase starting, we would like to restart the process of including Polly and isl into core LLVM to bring changes in early on before the next LLVM release. Short summary: * Today Polly is already part of each LLVM

Sorry for not responding earlier. On 05/20/2016 03:05 PM, Roman Gareev wrote: > Thank you very much for the advices! I could probably try to avoid > using of nonhardware prefetching in the project, if Tobias doesn’t > disagree with it. My understanding is that prefetching isn’t used > explicitly in [1] and, according to [2], in some cases 90% of the > turbo boost peak of the

2016-05-19 21:45 GMT+05:00 4lbert C0hen <4lbert.h.c0hen at gmail.com>: > One short note. I would advise against spending time on prefetching for x86. > Recent hardware prefetchers are amazingly good at strided accesses in > single-threaded code. Caution: this is not based on objective/published > data, but on personal experience. > > There are open challenges in

On 08/10/2013 06:59 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > I have evaluated Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981). Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. Hi Star Tan, thanks for the update. > There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples: > clang (run id = 27): clang -O3 > pollyBasic (run id =

At 2013-09-02 17:05:52,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/01/2013 08:02 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> It seems that Polly's code generation can leads to high compile-time overhead, especially for PolyBench applications such as 2mm, 3mm, gemm, syrk, etc. Some basic evaluation and analysis for Polly's code generation

Hello all, i've been haveing problems with oggenc on windows 2k. When i encode WAV files sometimes it started to choke, just oggenc, not the os. It startes freezeing for seconds and then every so often goes up by .10 % or something... the project time remaining is something like 20min at 3% for a 3 min wav. I've been useing it for a while and it only just started, before this it was

Like the subject says, I''ve got a really weird problem. A co-worker added a couple of gems to our rails project. I installed these gems on my machine (a macbook, os x 10.5.6), start the server, and it says it can''t find these gems: ============= Missing these required gems: mini_exiftool = 1.0.1 mini_magick = 1.2.3 You''re running: ruby 1.8.6.114 at