similar to: defining polymorphic type condition

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "defining polymorphic type condition"

2006 Jul 31
3
Polymorphic associations and single table inheritance
Running into an interesting problem that at first glance appears to be a bug in the AR association code. However, it''s explicitly coded this way so I''m not so sure. I have some code like this: class Address < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :addressable, :polymorphic => true end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :addresses, :as => :addressable,
2006 Jan 19
7
bug in has_many count?
I can submit a patch, but wanted to confirm I''m looking at this right... The docs indicate that if you specify a has_many association with :finder_sql, but no :counter_sql, it constructs the appropriate counter sql by substituting the SELECT clause. But has_many_association.rb doesn''t seem to do that -- it just passes Base#count_by_sql the finder_sql, which doesn''t
2008 Nov 03
0
acts_as_rateable in rails 2.2.0
Hi all, I have a problem with acts_as_rateable in rails 2.2.0. [code=]ActionView::TemplateError (uninitialized constant <#object>::Rating) on line #10 of app/views/blah/blah.html.erb: /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.2.0/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:102:in `const_missing'' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.0/lib/active_record/base.rb:2042:in
2006 Feb 23
3
has_many reference
I am trying to do something right from Agile Web Dev with Rails book and it does not work. I must be missing something obvious. I have a one-to-many relationship: class Draft < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :endorsees end class Endorsees < ActiveRecord:: Base belongs_to :draft end >From my reading, methinks I should be able to say: d = Draft.new d.endorsees << Endorsee.new
2007 Apr 03
0
[Sybase Adaptor] find_by_xxx does not work correctly.
Hi Please advice me about the following problem. * Problem find_by_xxx method does not work correctly the following caes with sybase adaptor. * How to reproducible model :users t.column :code, :string <-- :string column t.column :last_name, :string t.column :first_name,:string >> User.find(1) => #<User:0x2abe232a68e8
2008 Feb 20
0
Unicode Support for MS SQL Server
In order to coerce Rails 1.2.x into supporting Unicode values for an attribute in a model, I found I had to do the following: 1) Change the underlying column type from varchar to nvarchar. 2) Prepend any quoted values going into nvarchar columns with a capital-letter-N, e. g. ''unicode'' becomes N''unicode'' In order to accomplish this, I modified
2006 Feb 28
3
[AR] #{id} namespace visibility used in finder_sql
Dears, [Rails 1.0.0] I''m working with a legacy schema, and around my 20+ models i''ve used some AR constructs. They are based on a finder_sql doing some dirty sql and using #{id} from the ''pivot'' model for extracting data in other tables. like : class Division < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "legacy_division" set_primary_key
2008 May 07
1
Assigning to the foreign key on a belongs_to association
I''ve encountered what seems like an odd omission in the behaviour of belongs_to associations: if you assign to the foreign key attribute, it doesn''t update the associated object (or mark a previously loaded one as stale) until you explicitly save or reload it. Let''s say we have a Company model, which belongs_to :city : >> torchbox =
2006 Oct 30
2
It this possible: finder_sql-like behavior for belongs_to?
Guys, I have a need to support as has_many/belongs_to relationship on a legacy(kind of) schema. The reason I say kind of is that the schema does have "id" columns that are used in many associations, but this particular has_many/belongs_to association needs to support different ones. I''ve attached to code at the end of this email. Suffice it to say I need to use the standard
2005 Dec 27
0
How do I combine :finder_sql and :conditions to perform a sub-search on a custom has_many relationship?
I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign keys. What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''. Let''s say the tables are "stores" and
2011 Apr 05
1
Why does AR use base_class for polymorphic relationship "type"
I have a couple models that inherit from a base class that then inherits from AR. When they are used in a polymorphic relationship the "type" is always the base class. Just curious if anyone has a reason why it doesn''t use the *actual* class rather then the base_class. I have patched AR to use the actual class if !base_class.table_exists? but it adds another query each time
2006 Mar 14
4
has_one
I''ve got an order model that stores order data. One piece of data is a credit card type, which is a digit 1,2 or 3. I have a cardType model that has an id, shortName and LongName for the credit card merchant (visa, mastercard, amex). I want to be able to say: order.cardType.shortName, but can''t seem to get has_one working. It works with has_many and a finder_sql statement on
2009 Mar 03
2
Passing an SQL fragment in AR save
I have a basic model class TestTime with no customization. class TestTime < ActiveRecord::Base end I would like to pass the following SQL fragment as part of an AR save call to TestTime objects. How and where would I do this in the model? "set c_time=current_time" (current_time is an SQL method, not a variable). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Jul 01
0
activerecord generating wrong syntax with postgresql
I''m using activerecord outside of rails and find_first generates sql that postgresql doesnt'' like. This is rails 1.1.4, with everything up to date via "gem update". This is the command line: ruby -rrubygems seca -c ../etc/seca.cnf cert --export 1 --format pkcs12 --key root.key >root.pfx This is the error: (PGError: ERROR: argument of WHERE must be type
2010 Jan 25
0
has_many, :finder_sql, setting attributes
Hi all, My question is somewhat complicated, but bear with me. My project has a number of models: User, Program, and Team. Users belong to multiple Programs. Programs have multiple teams, but Teams belong to one program. For each Program a User belongs to, he can belong to multiple Teams. (Think of this in an athletic context where users are athletes, programs are universities). So my
2005 Dec 27
3
Trouble combining :has_many, :finder_sql and :conditions to create a sub-search
I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign keys. What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''. Let''s say the tables are "stores" and
2006 Jan 06
1
has_many with :finder_sql question
hi all, I have a Class, Client, which has_many projects (Project class). the projects depend on a session_id variable, however. So the question is, how can I do the following: has_many :projects, :finder_sql => "SELECT p.* FROM projects p INNER JOIN projects_users pu ON pu.project_id = p.id WHERE pu.user_id = #{session[:user_id]}" The problem is that I need to filter a
2006 Jun 09
1
finder_sql issue with has_many :through
I have an inner join query that Action Record can''t seem to pull off conventionally, so I''m trying to use :finder_sql to utilize an sql query that works beautifully in SQL. The problem is, when I try to call the method, I get the following: private method `gsub'' called for #<Array:0x267de04> Here is my has_many code: has_many :mod_privileges,
2006 Aug 13
1
Is :finder_sql using #{id} broken?
Hi All, It seems that :finder_sql in a HABTM association only interprets a single quoted #{id} the first time through a query. I see examples of this being used in a few places (though with has_many) and I don''t really see how to use :finder_sql without a #{id}. Am I missing something or is this just broken? -- Paul Haddad (paul.haddad@gmail.com paul@pth.com)
2006 Jul 24
1
has_many + finder_sql
from the api I got: <pre> has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql => ''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' + ''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' + ''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' + ''ORDER BY p.first_name'' </pre> I would like to pass in the