similar to: Split access on a single interface

Hey guys, I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an install from source. And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Here's more of that log entry: Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA Keepalived_vrrp[44943]: VRRP Instance = VI_1 Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1053 Bug ID: 1053 Summary: connection tracker integration issue Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: i386 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon Assignee:

Hello, First , thanks to Tom for it''s great job ! Netfilter is really easy and powerfull with shorewall. So, I have configured two firewalls whith shorewall using keepalived for the redundant VRRP stuff. FW-a is MASTER and FW-b is BACKUP. Everything works correctly and FW-b upgrade to MASTER when FW-a is down or disconnected. FW-b downgrade to BACKUP when FW-a comes back. But when I

Hello, I get this error when trying to build Keepalived 1.2.1 on a CentOS-4 box: # gcc -g -O2 (..) -D_WITH_LVS_ -D_WITH_VRRP_ -c smtp.c In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31, from ../include/smtp.h:34, from smtp.c:27: *../include/vrrp_ipaddress.h:32:27: linux/if_addr.h: No such file or directory* In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31,

Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm seeing /etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork --log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224 Registering Kernel netlink reflector Registering Kernel netlink command channel Registering gratuitous ARP shared channel Opening file

I am currently using shorewall on leaf-bering. I have set it up with keepalived to create a high availabilty firewall cluster. I have an odd question in regards to shorewall. Currently in production I have keepalived controlling shorewall starts and stops. If I remove this and leave shorewall running on the backup firewall, will I run into any problems with having the nat tables built out and

Hello folks, my company has experience in setting up single asterisk setup, but recently one of our customers asked us to set up an asterisk cluster, that must be High Availability and Load Balanced. So I wrote here to have some hint or advice about the configuration we thought. First of all I'll explain you the scenario: The asterisk cluster must serve as Call Center

On 27/06/2017 00:49, James A. Peltier wrote: > Bind does not have a method to do multi-master replication. All updates must be done via an intermediary service (database). > > In our case, we've used containers and Consul for providing a highly available DNS service. A container will fire up and race for the master lock. It will dump the contents of the database into its named

Hi!I've a question: I've 2 asterisk, I want pull the ethernet wire and then reconnect it after 5 second, using the VRRP protocol, where must I set the IP for the connection goes on the second asterisk? I want this: I call to asterisk1, then I pull the ethernet wire down, vrrp makes up the other asterisk but not the audio streaming...the callers are always pointed to asterisk1, but for the

Hi! I' ve this problem: I've 2 asterisks box, asterisk11 and asterisk12, and one wi_fi phone. I call from wi_fi to a X-lite phone on a windows xp.I've setuped the X-lite to my vrrp IP (vrid IP) and the call is ok, I call from the wi_fi to X-lite and from the X-lite to wi_fi. In asterisk panell is all ok, and I listen the voice to the xp and in the wi_fi phone. asterisk12 is my master.

I am trying to figure out a way to have the two packages running on the system. Is there a way to tell shorewall NOT to define IP addresses for a specific port so keepalived(vrrp) can create them and not cause a conflict. Or for that matter the other way around would work. Any help would be appreciated.

Bind does not have a method to do multi-master replication. All updates must be done via an intermediary service (database). In our case, we've used containers and Consul for providing a highly available DNS service. A container will fire up and race for the master lock. It will dump the contents of the database into its named configurations and assuming it has the lock will assume the IP

Hi I have one question ... I am trying to modify and make ma own Linux Redhat install with kickstart from a bootable cdrom.... This works very good. But, my question is ... Ho can I prompts the user from question in the install process ? Example name , IP address ... I have trying to modify the syslinux.cfg, ks.cfg and it doesn't works.... Did you have any idea ? Thanks if you answer

Hi!I'm working with 2 linux, with 2 IP;I want make a copy of some files inside one directory to the other linux.I called a file scriptx.sh in the first linux and this is the body: #!/bin/bash rsync -avvz --delete --rsh=ssh --stats /home/copia/ root@192.168.xxx.xx:/home/vrrp/dir/copia/ (xxx.xx are numbers...rights..only for security I crypted them) ok, then I create the crontab file with

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746 Bug ID: 1746 Summary: Connection Tracking - TC_DROP in SK_BUFF Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nf_conntrack Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1747 Bug ID: 1747 Summary: Connection Tracking - TC_DROP in SK_BUFF Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nf_conntrack Assignee:

Hi. Is anyone using conntrack-tools to implement gateway failover on a network with windows clients? I set it up with ucarp and keepalived, and found that gratuitous ARP doesn''t always seem to update the cache on Windows machines. It works the first time, but if a second failover happens, the client continues to send stuff to the wrong MAC address. Linux machines work fine.

I am setting up 2 Vyatta routers that will serve as redundant failover core routers out to the backbone of our ISP. They will be serving for routing between other branches and the ISP and bandwidth management. I am trying to differentiate between the plethora of information about having redundant, automatic failover routers and pretty much decided on VRRP for the IP address failover mechanism. I

Em 29-09-2015 15:03, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: >> And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing. > > "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces. Maybe there is a confusion here. Sounds like Tim thought keepalived would create that eth1, like a tunnel interface, but it won't. You have to

> From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons@us.didata.com> > > Glad to hear you had a workaround. > > I would suggest re-queing your TAC case, perhaps you got a outsourced or > less experienced engineer at Cisco. Their support has varied depending on > which city/group you get. Some have more experience then others. > > While your 2600 from 2001