similar to: Trouble about snmp.html

Hi, I''m fighting seriously with a most simple HTB setup. I''d like to share the incoming 64kbps into 5 and 59 for two different machines under NAT. HTB seems to hold the required limits when ceil is not set (no borrowing), but when borrowing enabled it seems to share equally rather then keeping the specified ratio. My setup is below. A typical output of "tc -s -d qdisc

Hi, I''m trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the lartc.org site: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50mbit ceil 80mbit burst 19k tc class add dev eth0

My hardware is a Linksys AP with MIPS 300MHz and Linux kernel 2.4.20. The traffics are from two LAN switch ports to WAN port. And the traffics are generate at a rate of 80Mbit. So the total traffic to WAN port is 160Mbit. The shaping works well that the traffic to WAN port is about 50/30Mbit according to configuration. But the priority seems strange when the root rate is 50Mbit. When the root

Greetings, Currently, we have several Direct Attached Storage (DAS) units, connected to respective servers through Adaptec SCSI Controller. 1) Most of the time we used 80Mbit/s for external SCSI devices (in this case, the DAS itself). Is it true the maximum speed for external SCSI devices would be up to 80Mbit/s? Tried to change to 320Mbit/s but somehow the kernel crashed. Is there any specific

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8313 Summary: Minix Support - check for netinet/{in_systm,ip}.h and SO_BROADCAST Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

Rick, I extremely dislike Exchange as well. I have a long list of problems: near impossibility to monitor logs for trouble, poor configurable spam checking, no good way to archive and review emails ... I could go on for paragraphs, but the main reason we recently migrated away from SBS/Exchange is that Microsoft no longer sells Small Business Server and its replacement, Server Essentials, does

For some time now I was curious on what the size impact of LTO was. I decided to test this with a large C++ app, clang was a natural choice. With PR8313 fixed with the proposed patch and PR8300 avoided by disabling constructor aliasing I was able to hack clang to bootstrap with LTO enabled using the gold plugin. I did the testing on linux x86-64. Gcc is the 4.4.4 included with Fedora 13. The

Hi ! I have an error in this script as it is not working and I can''t figure out what that is. Anyone can help? Thanks! #!/bin/bash ### unitati de masura pt debit # kbps - kilobytes per second # mbps - megabytes per second # kbit - kilbits per second # mbit - megabits per second EXT_IF="eth0" INT_IF="eth1" TC=/sbin/tc IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables # RATE

> The full patches I used are attached. I hope to get the non-hackish > bits reviewed, starting by the fix to 8313. attached now. Cheers, -- Rafael Ávila de Espíndola -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 25795 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hi All, Is it possible to make a IAX2 connection between asterisk 1.6.1.0 , and asterisk 1.2.14 ? i tried to use a IAX2 connection between version 1.2.14 and 1.6.1.0 but it gave an error - 1.2.14 End - Error Msg WARNING[8313]: chan_iax2.c:7103 socket_read: Call rejected by 147.120.203.71: No authority found 1.2 END , IAX.conf [trunk14] type=friend host=147.120.203.71 secret=test123

More experimentation ... I tried removing userdb and passdb from the dovecot NTLM config. That didn't work. I then tried adding a static userdb as follows: userdb { driver = static # allow_all_users = yes args = gid=100 home=/home/HPRS/%n } (Interestingly, when I uncommented "allow_all_users" I got an "unsupported setting" [or something like that], even though that

As to your suggested links, Samba4 uses Heimdal Kerberos which is part of the Samba4 installation: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Installation, so I don't know if the krb5 configs discussed in your link will apply. I'll revisit this if other things I'm trying don't work out. If that http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm link were on paper I've

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan

If I had time I would be all over this - but IMHO the main problem is that Dovecot != Exchange.? Even in small environments - unless I'm out of date, there's no calendar, tasks or contact lists within Dovecot. Your next best best is to use something like Horde that would allow you to auth via ActiveSync (on Outlook 2013 clients) and manage everything else that the users will want, with

Hello all, ( I apologize if this posts twice ) Here is my situation. I have 3 buildings linked with 100mbit fiber optics (2 runs that come to the corporate office). I have 3 RH9 boxes, one at each location. Each box at the remote locations have 4 NICs, one for the fiber link, one for LAN, one for the VOIP box and one for the internet connection. The corporate office has 4 NICs also, 1

Yes sure here they are: The first one that i have received 2day and does not work almost at all: #!/bin/bash ETH_IN="eth1" ETH_OUT="eth0" BANDA_TOTALA="2Mbit" # pentru neclasificati ar trebui sa fie banda minima - 1k - aici ar trebui sa ajunga trafic necunoscut, # care nu e organizat in shape-uri BANDA_NECLASIFICATI="8kbit" #Shape generale /sbin/tc

Quoting Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: > Rick, > > Samba4 AD/DC and Dovecot work perfectly for everything including access > from > SmartPhones.? I've got roaming domain logins, redirected folders, > calendars and > contacts work just fine with Outlook and WebDav for sharing calendars; > don't > need them in Dovecot.? > ? Do you have that documented

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Rafael Espindola wrote: >> The full patches I used are attached. I hope to get the non-hackish >> bits reviewed, starting by the fix to 8313. > > attached now. Wow, nice results. Please split the patches out according to what they do. Is there any impact on clang compile time by building with LTO? What about build times? :) -Chris