similar to: rescue_from ActionController::MethodNotAllowed

Hello All, I m trying to use a form on my website to send an email. So my form goes like this : <% form_tag("/emailfeeder/create", :method => :post) do %> <tr> <td class="col1">To: </td> <td class="col2"><%= text_field_tag "recepient", @recepient.to_s, :disabled => true %></td>

Hi everyone, I was just trying to catch some exceptions in my app, for "Record Not Found" I used this in my application.rb file rescue_from ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound, :with => :record_not_found rescue_from ActionController::NoMethodError, :with => :show_error private def record_not_found render :text => "404 Not Found", :status =>

I''m noticing that my development.log messages are not showing the usual complete logging per request/response when I am catching exceptions from my controllers using rescue_from. I was wondering if anyone has ever encountered this issue before. I''m using Rails 2.2.2. Processing DomainsController#show to xml (for 127.0.0.1 at 2009-04-03 16:41:38) [GET] Parameters:

Since commit 5e3517ea7b9fbd460f772bffc9212d882011f2bc, rescue_from is now being handled in tests. I''ve been using rescue_from to handle custom exceptions and testing that those exceptions are raised in functional tests with assert_raise. This no longer works now. What''s the proper way to test this now? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this

I''m using shortcuts for login, logout etc. in routes.rb, for example: map.login ''login'', :controller => ''session'', :action => ''new'' When I access http://localhost:3000/login I get following exception: ActionController::MethodNotAllowed Only get, head, post, put, and delete requests are allowed. Does anyone know

I am trying to develop an application that allows users to submit articles and add information about the references they used when citing facts. I have the sources broken down into types, such as books, periodicals, web-sites, etc as single table inheritance on the sources table. Routes are nested so that :articles, :has_many => :sources When trying to edit a source, through the

OK ... so I''m not supposed to use it but ... Why doesn''t rescue_from ActionController::RoutingError work witht he code from http://www.rubyplus.org/episodes/20-Extended-RESTful-Authentication-Rails-2-App.html class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base helper :all # include all helpers, all the time # See ActionController::RequestForgeryProtection for details

The new rescue_from in edge rails seems to conflict with ActionWebService, which I need for various other purposes. When I define, for example (with AWS gem installed): <b>rescue_from ActionController::RoutingError, :with => :page_not_found</b> I get the exception: <b>uninitialized constant ActionWebService::Dispatcher::ActionController::Base</b> OK, so AWS

Having some weird failures of rescue_from in all my specs. They still rescue in actual usage, just not in my specs. Made a pastie of the code: http://pastie.org/257399 This is with latest [as of 1:00 PM Eastern time zone] rspec/rspec-rails/edge. Thanks in advance for any replies on this. RSL -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

rescue_from stores exception class names in a hash table, and associates them with handlers. When an exception is raised there''s a name lookup, and if an entry is found its handler is invoked. In particular rescue_from does not emulate Ruby''s rescue semantics with regard to inheritance. Which is the rationale? Don''t you think taking is_a? and declaration order

I am trying to use the new Rails 2.0 macro : rescue_from class PostsController < ApplicationController rescue_from ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound, :with => :deny_access ... def show @post = Post.find_by_id(params[:id]) raise ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound if @post.nil? #illegal access ..... end def deny_access respond_to do |format| format.html end end but the

Hi, Iam getting the following error ActionController::MethodNotAllowed Only get, put and delete requests are allowed. Actually, Iam trying to have multiple actions for a form to create new record. The actions for the form are cancel, save, publish and preview. here''s the config/routes.rb file code snippet for the relevant controller - Events map.resources :events, :member =>

def dispfriends @myfriend=[] @myfriendlogin = [] i=0 @currentgroup = Group.find_by_id(params[:groupid]) puts @currentgroup.id @currentfriends= GroupFriend.find_all_by_user_id_and_group_id(current_user.id, @currentgroup.id) for n in @currentfriends @myfriend=n.friend_id @myusers = User.find_by_id(@myfriend) @myfriendlogin[i]=@myusers.login puts @myfriendlogin[i] i=i+1 respond_to do

I''m trying to move RestfulAuthentication''s UsersController to an Admin module--Admin::UsersController--as I''m also adding roles and permissions for an app I''m building. I would like this all to be within a single user interface with a standard security level required for all these pieces as defined in Admin::BaseController. So far, I''ve been able to

Hi everyone I want to have two restful controllers for the same resource (Users) One controller (UsersController) is straight in the controllers folder and is used for singup and so on Then i need another controller for users which is inside an admin folder (Admin::UsersController) In my routes.rb i have map.resources :users # Sample resource route within a namespace: map.namespace

SqueezeBox is a simple file system based routing framework for erubis templates. It aims for a couple of niceties as well: Instead of putting your logic inside your template, like you would with PHP, SqueezeBox recognizes a separate logic file to be called before it loads the template. This allows you room to load ActiveRecord models or do calculations. These logic files return to the webserver

I have written the Users controller and Spec tests correctly for the "successful creation" in the User controller however I get the following two errors: 1) UsersController POST ''create'' success should create a user Failure/Error: lambda do count should have been changed by 1, but was changed by 0 #

I saw this on a Gem implementation and don't understand why it needed "::UsersController" at all. My understanding that it is trying to find the relative path of UsersController, but why is it necessary to be there? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

I''m running Rails 2.0.2. My controller is subclassed from RetainController (which is subclassed from ApplicationController). Retain Controller has: rescue_from Retain::LogonFailed, :with => :logon_failed rescue_from Retain::FailedMarkedTrue, :with => :failed_marked_true It works if the exception occurs before I start processing the view. If I get the exception while in

Folks, I am using the restful_authentication plugin. This creates the users controller which is declared as a resource in routes.rb as below map.resources :users Now in the UsersController I have created an action to resetpwd that I am trying to get to from the login page when the user clicks "forgot password". However, when I do that the log file tells me that the call to